DNS dynamic updates represent an inherently vulnerable mechanism deliberately granting the potential for any host to dynamically modify DNS zone files. Consequently, this feature exposes domains to various security risks such as domain hijacking, compromise of domain control validation, and man-in-the-middle attacks. Originally devised without the implementation of authentication mechanisms, non-secure DNS updates were widely adopted in DNS software, subsequently leaving domains susceptible to a novel form of attack termed zone poisoning. In order to gauge the extent of this issue, our analysis encompassed over 353 million domain names, revealing the presence of 381,965 domains that openly accepted unsolicited DNS updates. We then undertook a comprehensive three-phase campaign involving the notification of Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs). Following extensive discussions spanning six months, we observed substantial remediation, with nearly 54% of nameservers and 98% of vulnerable domains addressing the issue. This outcome serves as evidence that engaging with CSIRTs can prove to be an effective approach for reporting security vulnerabilities. Moreover, our notifications had a lasting impact, as evidenced by the sustained low prevalence of vulnerable domains.

Ingress filtering, commonly referred to as Source Address Validation (SAV), is a practice aimed at discarding packets with spoofed source IP addresses at the network periphery. Outbound SAV, i.e., dropping traffic with spoofed source IP addresses as it leaves its source network, has received widespread attention in operational and research communities. It is one of the most effective ways to prevent Reflection-based Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks. Contrariwise, inbound SAV, i.e., dropping incoming spoofed traffic at the destination network edge, has received less attention, even though it provides protection for the deploying network. In this paper, we present the results of the Closed Resolver Project, our initiative aimed at finding networks without inbound SAV and raising awareness of the issue. We perform the first Internet-wide active measurement study to enumerate networks that enforce (or not) inbound SAV. We reach open and closed Domain Name System (DNS) resolvers in tested networks and determine whether they resolve requests with spoofed source IP addresses. Our method provides unprecedented insight into inbound SAV deployment by network operators, revealing 49% IPv4 and 26% IPv6 Autonomous Systems (AS) that suffer from a consistent or partial absence of inbound filtering. By identifying dual-stack DNS resolvers and ASes, we further show that inbound filtering is generally deployed consistently across IPv4 and IPv6. Finally, the lack of inbound SAV exposes 2.5M IPv4 and 100K IPv6 purportedly closed DNS resolvers to many types of external attacks, including NXNSAttack, zone poisoning, or zero-day vulnerabilities in DNS software.

IP spoofing, sending IP packets with a false source IP address, continues to be a primary attack vector for large-scale Denial of Service attacks. To combat spoofing, various interventions have been tried to increase the adoption of source address validation (SAV) among network operators. How can SAV deployment be increased? In this work, we conduct the first randomized control trial to measure the effectiveness of various notification mechanisms on SAV deployment. We include new treatments using nudges and channels, previously untested in notification experiments. Our design reveals a painful reality that contrasts with earlier observational studies: none of the notification treatments significantly improved SAV deployment compared to the control group. We explore the reasons for these findings and report on a survey among operators to identify ways forward. A portion of the operators indicate that they do plan to deploy SAV and ask for better notification mechanisms, training, and support materials for SAV implementation.

In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of WiSH-WalT, a framework for controllable and reproducible LoRa testbeds. The implementation of the WiSHFUL unified interface provides the means for controlling and adapting the LoRa parameters to given conditions and low energy consumption by configuring transmission power, spreading factor, bandwidth, and error coding rate. WalT provides support for running reproducible experiments based on the deployment of docker images on a distributed set of nodes. Put together, the functionalities of WiSHFUL and WalT open new possibilities for deploying reproducible LoRa testbeds. We have used WiSH-WalT to experiment with adaptive configuration of the LoRa parameters and evaluated the communication performance of LoRa motes in a setup with several gateways.

IP address counts are typically used as a surrogate metric for the number of hosts in a network, as in the case of ISP rankings based on botnet infected addresses. However, due to effects of dynamic IP address allocation, such counts tend to overestimate the number of hosts, sometimes by an order of magnitude. In the literature, the rate at which hosts change IP addresses is referred to as DHCP churn. Churn rates vary significantly within and among ISP networks, and such variation poses a challenge to any research that relies upon IP addresses as a metric. We present the first attempt towards estimating ISP and Internet-wide DHCP churn rates, in order to better understand the relation between IP addresses and hosts, as well as allow us to correct data relying on IP addresses as a surrogate metric. We propose an scalable active measurement methodology and then validate it using ground truth data from a medium-sized ISP. Next, we build a statistical model to estimate DHCP churn rates and validate against the ground truth data of the same ISP, estimating correctly 72.3% of DHCP churn rates. Finally, we apply our measurement methodology to four major ISPs, triangulate the results to another Internet census, and discuss the next steps to more precisely estimate DHCP churn rates.