Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sara Wade
dblp:147/3939
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6547-5555ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | Covariate-dependent Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 Improving prediction from dirichlet process mixtures via enrichment · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model › dirichlet process
dependent dirichlet process |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Covariate-dependent Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
hierarchical dirichlet process |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Covariate-dependent Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mixtures of Gaussian Process Experts with SMC^2 · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mixtures of Gaussian Process Experts with SMC^2 · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mixtures of Gaussian Process Experts with SMC^2 · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Covariate-dependent Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell RNA sequencing |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Covariate-dependent Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process mixture model |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Improving prediction from dirichlet process mixtures via enrichment · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain monte carlo · 2.0data augmentation · 2.0nested sequential monte carlo samplers · 0.9importance sampling · 0.9enrichment · 0.2dirichlet process mixture · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Covariate-dependent Hierarchical Dirichlet ProcessesabstractBayesian hierarchical modeling is a natural framework to effectively integrate data and borrow information across groups. In this paper, we address problems related to density estimation and identifying clusters across related groups, by proposing a hierarchical Bayesian approach that incorporates additional covariate information. To achieve flexibility, our approach builds on ideas from Bayesian nonparametrics, combining the hierarchical Dirichlet process with dependent Dirichlet processes. The proposed model is widely applicable, accommodating multiple and mixed covariate types through appropriate kernel functions as well as different output types through suitable component-specific likelihoods. This extends our ability to discern the relationship between covariates and clusters, while also effectively borrowing information and quantifying differences across groups. By employing a data augmentation trick, we are able to tackle the intractable normalized weights and construct a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for posterior inference. The proposed method is illustrated on simulated data and two real data sets on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and calcium imaging. For scRNA-seq data, we show that the incorporation of cell dynamics facilitates the discovery of additional cell subgroups. On calcium imaging data, our method identifies interpretable clusters of time frames with similar neural activity, aligning with the observed behavior of the animal. Huizi Zhang, Sara Wade, Natalia Bochkina |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2025 | Understanding the Trade-Offs in Accuracy and Uncertainty Quantification: Architecture and Inference Choices in Bayesian Neural Networks
Alisa Sheinkman, Sara Wade |
ECML/PKDD (7) | 2 |
| 2025 | Mixtures of Gaussian Process Experts with SMC^2abstractGaussian processes are a key component of many flexible statistical and machine learning models. However, they exhibit cubic computational complexity and high memory constraints due to the need of inverting and storing a full covariance matrix. To circumvent this, mixtures of Gaussian process experts have been considered where data points are assigned to independent experts, reducing the complexity by allowing inference based on smaller, local covariance matrices. Moreover, mixtures of Gaussian process experts substantially enrich the model's flexibility, allowing for behaviors such as non-stationarity, heteroscedasticity, and discontinuities. In this work, we construct a novel inference approach based on nested sequential Monte Carlo samplers to simultaneously infer both the gating network and Gaussian process expert parameters. This greatly improves inference compared to importance sampling, particularly in settings when a stationary Gaussian process is inappropriate, while still being thoroughly parallelizable. Teemu Härkönen, Sara Wade, Kody J. H. Law, Lassi Roininen |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2024 | Fast deep mixtures of Gaussian process expertsabstractAbstract Mixtures of experts have become an indispensable tool for flexible modelling in a supervised learning context, allowing not only the mean function but the entire density of the output to change with the inputs. Sparse Gaussian processes (GP) have shown promise as a leading candidate for the experts in such models, and in this article, we propose to design the gating network for selecting the experts from such mixtures of sparse GPs using a deep neural network (DNN). Furthermore, a fast one pass algorithm called Cluster–Classify–Regress (CCR) is leveraged to approximate the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator extremely quickly. This powerful combination of model and algorithm together delivers a novel method which is flexible, robust, and extremely efficient. In particular, the method is able to outperform competing methods in terms of accuracy and uncertainty quantification. The cost is competitive on low-dimensional and small data sets, but is significantly lower for higher-dimensional and big data sets . Iteratively maximizing the distribution of experts given allocations and allocations given experts does not provide significant improvement, which indicates that the algorithm achieves a good approximation to the local MAP estimator very fast. This insight can be useful also in the context of other mixture of experts models. Clement Etienam, Kody J. H. Law, Sara Wade, Vitaly Zankin |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2023 | Leveraging Variational Autoencoders for Multiple Data Imputation
Breeshey Roskams-Hieter, Jude Wells, Sara Wade |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 3 |
| 2021 | Pseudo-marginal Bayesian inference for Gaussian process latent variable models
Charles W. L. Gadd, Sara Wade, Akeel A. Shah |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2020 | Enriched mixtures of generalised Gaussian process expertsabstractMixtures of experts probabilistically divide the input space into regions, where the assumptions of each expert, or conditional model, need only hold locally. Combined with Gaussian process (GP) experts, this results in a powerful and highly flexible model. We focus on alternative mixtures of GP experts, which model the joint distribution of the inputs and targets explicitly. We highlight issues of this approach in multi-dimensional input spaces, namely, poor scalability and the need for an unnecessarily large number of experts, degrading the predictive performance and increasing uncertainty. We construct a novel model to address these issues through a nested partitioning scheme that automatically infers the number of components at both levels. Multiple response types are accommodated through a generalised GP framework, while multiple input types are included through a factorised exponential family structure. We show the effectiveness of our approach in estimating a parsimonious probabilistic description of both synthetic data of increasing dimension and an Alzheimer’s challenge dataset. Charles W. L. Gadd, Sara Wade, Alexis Boukouvalas |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2014 | Improving prediction from dirichlet process mixtures via enrichment
Sara Wade, David B. Dunson, Sonia Petrone, Lorenzo Trippa |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |