VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aurko Roy
dblp:147/4950
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 19% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 43% Algorithms and data structures · 25% Approximation and online algorithms · 20% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · NIPS 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · NIPS 2016 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › clustering approximation
hierarchical clustering approximation |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · NIPS 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · NIPS 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation › rounding
LP rounding |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding and Improving Interpolation in Autoencoders via an Adversarial Regularizer · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding and Improving Interpolation in Autoencoders via an Adversarial Regularizer · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space › latent space manipulation
latent space interpolation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding and Improving Interpolation in Autoencoders via an Adversarial Regularizer · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
paraphrase generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Paraphrasing without Translation · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › paraphrase generation
unsupervised paraphrase generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Paraphrasing without Translation · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Paraphrasing without Translation · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
vector-quantized variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Paraphrasing without Translation · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Thermometer Encoding: One Hot Way To Resist Adversarial Examples · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Thermometer Encoding: One Hot Way To Resist Adversarial Examples · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
discrete latent variable |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fast Decoding in Sequence Models Using Discrete Latent Variables · ICML 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
parallel decoding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fast Decoding in Sequence Models Using Discrete Latent Variables · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fast Decoding in Sequence Models Using Discrete Latent Variables · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
memory-augmented neural networks |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning to Remember Rare Events · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reinforcement Learning under Model Mismatch · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reinforcement Learning under Model Mismatch · NIPS 2017 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading Metrics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
extended formulations |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016 |
Computational complexity
proof complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Fast Decoding in Sequence Models Using Discrete Latent Variables · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Learning to Remember Rare Events · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sphere growing · 0.5semidefinite programming · 0.5residual vector-quantized variational autoencoder · 0.4machine translation · 0.4adversarial training · 0.4one-hot encoding · 0.3discrete latent variable · 0.3autoregressive modeling · 0.3autoencoding · 0.3stochastic gradient descent · 0.3spreading metrics · 0.3robust MDPs · 0.3function approximation · 0.3lasserre relaxation · 0.2integer linear programming · 0.2LP relaxation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question AnsweringabstractThe task of long-form question answering (LFQA) involves retrieving documents relevant to a given question and using them to generate a paragraph-length answer.While many models have recently been proposed for LFQA, we show in this paper that the task formulation raises fundamental challenges regarding evaluation and dataset creation that currently preclude meaningful modeling progress.To demonstrate these challenges, we first design a new system that relies on sparse attention and contrastive retriever learning to achieve state-of-the-art performance on the ELI5 LFQA dataset.While our system tops the public leaderboard, a detailed analysis reveals several troubling trends: (1) our system's generated answers are not actually grounded in the documents that it retrieves; (2) ELI5 contains significant train / validation overlap, as at least 81% of ELI5 validation questions occur in paraphrased form in the training set; (3) ROUGE-L is not an informative metric of generated answer quality and can be easily gamed; and (4) human evaluations used for other text generation tasks are unreliable for LFQA.We offer suggestions to mitigate each of these issues, which we hope will lead to more rigorous LFQA research and meaningful progress in the future. 1 * Work done during an internship at Google Research. 1 Resources accompanying our paper can be found in https://github.com/martiansideofthemoon/ hurdles-longform-qa Val Q: Can you protect electronics from EMPs/solar flares?If so, how?Generation using random retrievals, 24.8 ROUGE-L Yes, you absolutely can, in fact you can build a Faraday cage around your electronics, and protect them from solar flares...This is what is done with the Faraday cage around your electronics, which is the problem.The reason it is expensive is because it requires a huge amount of power and is expensive to replace... designed to shield your electronics from solar flares, you will have to pay for the protection.This is because you have to buy a piece of equipment that is designed to shield your electronics from solar flares, and that is expensive.... This is also expensive, but not as expensive as the protection you need to shield your electronics from solar flares... designed to be as cheap as possible... Generation using predicted retrievals, 19.0 ROUGE-L Yes, you can shield them.But it's a slow process... Also, the equipment that's powered by them is a lot more expensive than you'd think, so it's hard to make sure that you're not just shielding them from your remote control.Train Q1: How does an EMP ruin electronics?What does it do?How would they be fixed?Can It be protected against?How?Train Q2: If Earth were hit with a massive EMP, would all of our currently technology be completely unusable permanently?Train Q3: Whenever a electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is released what does it do to electronics to disable them?Train Q4: If earth was hit with an EMP, could we ever restore electricity?If not, why?Train Q5: What are solar flares and why does it impact our electronics?Train Q6.When an EMP goes off, can the electronics affected be replaced?Gold Answer, 18.6 ROUGE-L I'll start with the grounding question, because that's the easiest to answer: Doesn't help a bit.All that matters is that the metal container is conductive and doesn't have gaps...completely seal your Faraday cage.Consider soldering the lid on to that paint can... look at little baggie it comes in.Sealed mylar.That protected that chip from air travel at 35,000 feet, land travel through rural, urban, and suburban areas, and all the electromagnetic radiation that the trip entails...No lead shielding.No safes.... Random Train Ans, 19.4 ROUGE-LThe fast lane/slow lane is a bit of a misnomer.It gives the impression that new, faster lanes are being built.In reality, normal speed will be... Kalpesh Krishna, Aurko Roy, Mohit Iyyer |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2021 | Efficient Content-Based Sparse Attention with Routing TransformersabstractSelf-attention has recently been adopted for a wide range of sequence modeling problems. Despite its effectiveness, self-attention suffers from quadratic computation and memory requirements with respect to sequence length. Successful approaches to reduce this complexity focused on attending to local sliding windows or a small set of locations independent of content. Our work proposes to learn dynamic sparse attention patterns that avoid allocating computation and memory to attend to content unrelated to the query of interest. This work builds upon two lines of research: It combines the modeling flexibility of prior work on content-based sparse attention with the efficiency gains from approaches based on local, temporal sparse attention. Our model, the Routing Transformer, endows self-attention with a sparse routing module based on online k-means while reducing the overall complexity of attention to O( n 1.5 d) from O( n 2 d) for sequence length n and hidden dimension d. We show that our model outperforms comparable sparse attention models on language modeling on Wikitext-103 (15.8 vs 18.3 perplexity), as well as on image generation on ImageNet-64 (3.43 vs 3.44 bits/dim) while using fewer self-attention layers. Additionally, we set a new state-of-the-art on the newly released PG-19 data-set, obtaining a test perplexity of 33.2 with a 22 layer Routing Transformer model trained on sequences of length 8192. We open-source the code for Routing Transformer in Tensorflow. 1 Aurko Roy, Mohammad Saffar, Ashish Vaswani, David Grangier |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2019 | Unsupervised Paraphrasing without TranslationabstractParaphrasing exemplifies the ability to abstract semantic content from surface forms.Recent work on automatic paraphrasing is dominated by methods leveraging Machine Translation (MT) as an intermediate step.This contrasts with humans, who can paraphrase without being bilingual.This work proposes to learn paraphrasing models from an unlabeled monolingual corpus only.To that end, we propose a residual variant of vector-quantized variational auto-encoder.We compare with MT-based approaches on paraphrase identification, generation, and training augmentation.Monolingual paraphrasing outperforms unsupervised translation in all settings.Comparisons with supervised translation are more mixed: monolingual paraphrasing is interesting for identification and augmentation; supervised translation is superior for generation. Aurko Roy, David Grangier |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Understanding and Improving Interpolation in Autoencoders via an Adversarial Regularizer
David Berthelot, Colin Raffel, Aurko Roy, Ian J. Goodfellow |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2018 | Thermometer Encoding: One Hot Way To Resist Adversarial Examples
Jacob Buckman, Aurko Roy, Colin Raffel, Ian J. Goodfellow |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Fast Decoding in Sequence Models Using Discrete Latent VariablesabstractAutoregressive sequence models based on deep neural networks, such as RNNs, Wavenet and Transformer are the state-of-the-art on many tasks. However, they lack parallelism and are thus slow for long sequences. RNNs lack parallelism both during training and decoding, while architectures like WaveNet and Transformer are much more parallel during training, but still lack parallelism during decoding. We present a method to extend sequence models using discrete latent variables that makes decoding much more parallel. The main idea behind this approach is to first autoencode the target sequence into a shorter discrete latent sequence, which is generated autoregressively, and finally decode the full sequence from this shorter latent sequence in a parallel manner. To this end, we introduce a new method for constructing discrete latent variables and compare it with previously introduced methods. Finally, we verify that our model works on the task of neural machine translation, where our models are an order of magnitude faster than comparable autoregressive models and, while lower in BLEU than purely autoregressive models, better than previously proposed non-autogregressive translation. Lukasz Kaiser, Samy Bengio, Aurko Roy, Ashish Vaswani, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Noam Shazeer |
ICML | 3 |
| 2017 | Learning to Remember Rare Events
Lukasz Kaiser, Ofir Nachum, Aurko Roy, Samy Bengio |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2017 | Reinforcement Learning under Model MismatchabstractWe study reinforcement learning under model misspecification, where we do not have access to the true environment but only to a reasonably close approximation to it. We address this problem by extending the framework of robust MDPs to the model-free Reinforcement Learning setting, where we do not have access to the model parameters, but can only sample states from it. We define robust versions of Q-learning, Sarsa, and TD-learning and prove convergence to an approximately optimal robust policy and approximate value function respectively. We scale up the robust algorithms to large MDPs via function approximation and prove convergence under two different settings. We prove convergence of robust approximate policy iteration and robust approximate value iteration for linear architectures (under mild assumptions). We also define a robust loss function, the mean squared robust projected Bellman error and give stochastic gradient descent algorithms that are guaranteed to converge to a local minimum. Aurko Roy, Sebastian Pokutta |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading MetricsabstractWe study the cost function for hierarchical clusterings introduced by (Dasgupta, 2016) where hierarchies are treated as first-class objects rather than deriving their cost from projections into flat clusters. It was also shown in (Dasgupta, 2016) that a top-down algorithm based on the uniform Sparsest Cut problem returns a hierarchical clustering of cost at most $O\left(\alpha_n \log n\right)$ times the cost of the optimal hierarchical clustering, where $\alpha_n$ is the approximation ratio of the Sparsest Cut subroutine used. Thus using the best known approximation algorithm for Sparsest Cut due to Arora-Rao- Vazirani, the top-down algorithm returns a hierarchical clustering of cost at most $O\left(\log^{3/2} n\right)$ times the cost of the optimal solution. We improve this by giving an $O(\log{n})$-approximation algorithm for this problem. Our main technical ingredients are a combinatorial characterization of ultrametrics induced by this cost function, deriving an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation for this family of ultrametrics, and showing how to iteratively round an LP relaxation of this formulation by using the idea of sphere growing which has been extensively used in the context of graph partitioning. We also prove that our algorithm returns an $O(\log{n})$- approximate hierarchical clustering for a generalization of this cost function also studied in (Dasgupta, 2016). Experiments show that the hierarchies found by using the ILP formulation as well as our rounding algorithm often have better projections into flat clusters than the standard linkage based algorithms. We conclude with constant factor inapproximability results for this problem: 1) no polynomial size LP or SDP can achieve a constant factor approximation for this problem and 2) no polynomial time algorithm can achieve a constant factor approximation under the Small Set Expansion hypothesis. Aurko Roy, Sebastian Pokutta |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | Strong Reductions for Extended Formulations
Gábor Braun, Sebastian Pokutta, Aurko Roy |
IPCO | 3 |
| 2016 | Hierarchical Clustering via Spreading MetricsabstractWe study the cost function for hierarchical clusterings introduced by [Dasgupta, 2015] where hierarchies are treated as first-class objects rather than deriving their cost from projections into flat clusters. It was also shown in [Dasgupta, 2015] that a top-down algorithm returns a hierarchical clustering of cost at most (O\left(\alphan \log n\right)) times the cost of the optimal hierarchical clustering, where (\alphan) is the approximation ratio of the Sparsest Cut subroutine used. Thus using the best known approximation algorithm for Sparsest Cut due to Arora-Rao-Vazirani, the top down algorithm returns a hierarchical clustering of cost at most (O\left(\log^{3/2} n\right)) times the cost of the optimal solution. We improve this by giving an (O(\log{n}))-approximation algorithm for this problem. Our main technical ingredients are a combinatorial characterization of ultrametrics induced by this cost function, deriving an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation for this family of ultrametrics, and showing how to iteratively round an LP relaxation of this formulation by using the idea of \emph{sphere growing} which has been extensively used in the context of graph partitioning. We also prove that our algorithm returns an (O(\log{n}))-approximate hierarchical clustering for a generalization of this cost function also studied in [Dasgupta, 2015]. Experiments show that the hierarchies found by using the ILP formulation as well as our rounding algorithm often have better projections into flat clusters than the standard linkage based algorithms. We conclude with an inapproximability result for this problem, namely that no polynomial sized LP or SDP can be used to obtain a constant factor approximation for this problem. Aurko Roy, Sebastian Pokutta |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | The matching problem has no small symmetric SDPabstractYannakakis [27, 26] showed that the matching problem does not have a small symmetric linear program. Rothvoß [23] recently proved that any, not necessarily symmetric, linear program also has exponential size. It is natural to ask whether the matching problem can be expressed compactly in a framework such as semidefinite programming (SDP) that is more powerful than linear programming but still allows efficient optimization. We answer this question negatively for symmetric SDPs: any symmetric SDP for the matching problem has exponential size. We also show that an O(k)-round Lasserre SDP relaxation for the asymmetric metric traveling salesperson problem yields at least as good an approximation as any symmetric SDP relaxation of size nk. The key technical ingredient underlying both these results is an upper bound on the degree needed to derive polynomial identities that hold over the space of matchings or traveling salesperson tours. Gábor Braun, Jonah Brown-Cohen, Arefin Huq, Sebastian Pokutta, Prasad Raghavendra, Aurko Roy, Benjamin Weitz, Daniel Zink |
SODA | 6 |