Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ibrahim Nafisah
dblp:147/7075
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cross-validation · 0.2akaike information criterion · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence dataabstractMOTIVATION: Current high-throughput sequencing has greatly transformed genome sequence analysis. In the context of very low-coverage sequencing (<0.1×), performing 'binning' or 'windowing' on mapped short sequences ('reads') is critical to extract genomic information of interest for further evaluation, such as copy-number alteration analysis. If the window size is too small, many windows will exhibit zero counts and almost no pattern can be observed. In contrast, if the window size is too wide, the patterns or genomic features will be 'smoothed out'. Our objective is to identify an optimal window size in between the two extremes. RESULTS: We assume the reads density to be a step function. Given this model, we propose a data-based estimation of optimal window size based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and cross-validation (CV) log-likelihood. By plotting the AIC and CV log-likelihood curve as a function of window size, we are able to estimate the optimal window size that minimizes AIC or maximizes CV log-likelihood. The proposed methods are of general purpose and we illustrate their application using low-coverage next-generation sequence datasets from real tumour samples and simulated datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package to estimate optimal window size is available at http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/∼arief/R/win/. Arief Gusnanto, Charles C. Taylor, Ibrahim Nafisah, Henry M. Wood, Pamela Rabbitts, Stefano Berri |
Bioinform. | 3 |