Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ibrahim Nafisah

dblp:147/7075 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration analysis
0.212014
Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis
0.212014
Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cross-validation · 0.2akaike information criterion · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Current high-throughput sequencing has greatly transformed genome sequence analysis. In the context of very low-coverage sequencing (<0.1×), performing 'binning' or 'windowing' on mapped short sequences ('reads') is critical to extract genomic information of interest for further evaluation, such as copy-number alteration analysis. If the window size is too small, many windows will exhibit zero counts and almost no pattern can be observed. In contrast, if the window size is too wide, the patterns or genomic features will be 'smoothed out'. Our objective is to identify an optimal window size in between the two extremes. RESULTS: We assume the reads density to be a step function. Given this model, we propose a data-based estimation of optimal window size based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and cross-validation (CV) log-likelihood. By plotting the AIC and CV log-likelihood curve as a function of window size, we are able to estimate the optimal window size that minimizes AIC or maximizes CV log-likelihood. The proposed methods are of general purpose and we illustrate their application using low-coverage next-generation sequence datasets from real tumour samples and simulated datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package to estimate optimal window size is available at http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/∼arief/R/win/.
Arief Gusnanto, Charles C. Taylor, Ibrahim Nafisah, Henry M. Wood, Pamela Rabbitts, Stefano Berri
Bioinform.3