Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Anusha Balakrishnan

dblp:148/4470 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 64% Language models and text generation · 26% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.822019
Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialogue · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
constrained decoding
0.412019
Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialogue · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue system training
0.412019
Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.412019
Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialogue · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
negotiation dialogue system
0.312018
Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialogues · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
collaborative dialogue
0.312017
Learning Symmetric Collaborative Dialogue Agents with Dynamic Knowledge Graph Embeddings · ACL (1) 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph embedding
0.312017
Learning Symmetric Collaborative Dialogue Agents with Dynamic Knowledge Graph Embeddings · ACL (1) 2017
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation
0.112019
Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
strategy learning
0.112018
Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialogues · EMNLP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.1self-supervised learning · 0.8tree-structured semantic representation · 0.4sequence-to-sequence model · 0.4supervised learning · 0.3retrieval-based generation · 0.3coarse dialogue acts · 0.3neural dialogue modeling · 0.3dynamic knowledge graph embedding · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialogue
abstract
Generating fluent natural language responses from structured semantic representations is a critical step in task-oriented conversational systems.Avenues like the E2E NLG Challenge have encouraged the development of neural approaches, particularly sequence-tosequence (Seq2Seq) models for this problem.The semantic representations used, however, are often underspecified, which places a higher burden on the generation model for sentence planning, and also limits the extent to which generated responses can be controlled in a live system.In this paper, we (1) propose using tree-structured semantic representations, like those used in traditional rule-based NLG systems, for better discourse-level structuring and sentence-level planning; (2) introduce a challenging dataset using this representation for the weather domain; (3) introduce a constrained decoding approach for Seq2Seq models that leverages this representation to improve semantic correctness; and (4) demonstrate promising results on our dataset and the E2E dataset.
Anusha Balakrishnan, Jinfeng Rao, Kartikeya Upasani, Michael White 0001, Rajen Subba
ACL (1)1
2019 Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue
abstract
Dongyeop Kang, Anusha Balakrishnan, Pararth Shah, Paul Crook, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Dongyeop Kang, Anusha Balakrishnan, Pararth Shah, Paul A. Crook, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)2
2019 A Tree-to-Sequence Model for Neural NLG in Task-Oriented Dialog
abstract
Generating fluent natural language responses from structured semantic representations is a critical step in task-oriented conversational systems.Sequence-to-sequence models on flat meaning representations (MR) have been dominant in this task, for example in the E2E NLG Challenge.Previous work has shown that a tree-structured MR can improve the model for better discourse-level structuring and sentence-level planning.In this work, we propose a tree-to-sequence model that uses a tree-LSTM encoder to leverage the tree structures in the input MR, and further enhance the decoding by a structure-enhanced attention mechanism.In addition, we explore combining these enhancements with constrained decoding to improve semantic correctness.Our method not only shows significant improvements over standard seq2seq baselines, but also is more data-efficient and generalizes better to hard scenarios.
Jinfeng Rao, Kartikeya Upasani, Anusha Balakrishnan, Michael White 0001, Rajen Subba
INLG3
2018 Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialogues
abstract
We consider negotiation settings in which two agents use natural language to bargain on goods.Agents need to decide on both high-level strategy (e.g., proposing $50) and the execution of that strategy (e.g., generating "The bike is brand new.Selling for just $50!").Recent work on negotiation trains neural models, but their end-to-end nature makes it hard to control their strategy, and reinforcement learning tends to lead to degenerate solutions.In this paper, we propose a modular approach based on coarse dialogue acts (e.g., propose(price=50)) that decouples strategy and generation.We show that we can flexibly set the strategy using supervised learning, reinforcement learning, or domain-specific knowledge without degeneracy, while our retrieval-based generation can maintain context-awareness and produce diverse utterances.We test our approach on the recently proposed DEALORNODEAL game, and we also collect a richer dataset based on real items on Craigslist.Human evaluation shows that our systems achieve higher task success rate and more human-like negotiation behavior than previous approaches.
He He 0001, Derek Chen, Anusha Balakrishnan, Percy Liang
EMNLP3
2017 Learning Symmetric Collaborative Dialogue Agents with Dynamic Knowledge Graph Embeddings
abstract
We study a symmetric collaborative dialogue setting in which two agents, each with private knowledge, must strategically communicate to achieve a common goal.The open-ended dialogue state in this setting poses new challenges for existing dialogue systems.We collected a dataset of 11K human-human dialogues, which exhibits interesting lexical, semantic, and strategic elements.To model both structured knowledge and unstructured language, we propose a neural model with dynamic knowledge graph embeddings that evolve as the dialogue progresses.Automatic and human evaluations show that our model is both more effective at achieving the goal and more human-like than baseline neural and rule-based models.
He He 0001, Anusha Balakrishnan, Mihail Eric, Percy Liang
ACL (1)2