Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fuxing Hong

dblp:149/1384 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Recommender systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 57% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 43%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.422016
Capturing Semantic Correlation for Item Recommendation in Tagging Systems · AAAI 2016
Context-Aware Collaborative Topic Regression with Social Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2014
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization
0.422016
Capturing Semantic Correlation for Item Recommendation in Tagging Systems · AAAI 2016
Context-Aware Collaborative Topic Regression with Social Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2014
Recommender systems › factorization models
factorization machines
0.412019
Interaction-Aware Factorization Machines for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2019
Recommender systems › click-through rate prediction
feature interaction
0.412019
Interaction-Aware Factorization Machines for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2019
Recommender systems › side information integration
tag-based recommendation
0.212016
Capturing Semantic Correlation for Item Recommendation in Tagging Systems · AAAI 2016
Recommender systems › social recommendation
social matrix factorization
0.212014
Context-Aware Collaborative Topic Regression with Social Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2014
Recommender systems
social recommendation
0.212014
Context-Aware Collaborative Topic Regression with Social Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.112016
Capturing Semantic Correlation for Item Recommendation in Tagging Systems · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
hierarchical bayesian model
0.112014
Context-Aware Collaborative Topic Regression with Social Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic modeling · 0.9matrix factorization · 0.5sampling scheme · 0.4neural network · 0.4attention network · 0.4spectral clustering · 0.4social matrix factorization · 0.4hierarchical bayesian model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Interaction-Aware Factorization Machines for Recommender Systems
abstract
Factorization Machine (FM) is a widely used supervised learning approach by effectively modeling of feature interactions. Despite the successful application of FM and its many deep learning variants, treating every feature interaction fairly may degrade the performance. For example, the interactions of a useless feature may introduce noises; the importance of a feature may also differ when interacting with different features. In this work, we propose a novel model named Interaction-aware Factorization Machine (IFM) by introducing Interaction-Aware Mechanism (IAM), which comprises the feature aspect and the field aspect, to learn flexible interactions on two levels. The feature aspect learns feature interaction importance via an attention network while the field aspect learns the feature interaction effect as a parametric similarity of the feature interaction vector and the corresponding field interaction prototype. IFM introduces more structured control and learns feature interaction importance in a stratified manner, which allows for more leverage in tweaking the interactions on both feature-wise and field-wise levels. Besides, we give a more generalized architecture and propose Interaction-aware Neural Network (INN) and DeepIFM to capture higher-order interactions. To further improve both the performance and efficiency of IFM, a sampling scheme is developed to select interactions based on the field aspect importance. The experimental results from two well-known datasets show the superiority of the proposed models over the state-of-the-art methods.
Fuxing Hong, Dongbo Huang
AAAI1
2016 Capturing Semantic Correlation for Item Recommendation in Tagging Systems
abstract
The popularity of tagging systems provides a great opportunity to improve the performance of item recommendation. Although existing approaches use topic modeling to mine the semantic information of items by grouping the tags labelled for items, they overlook an important property that tags link users and items as a bridge. Thus these methods cannot deal with the data sparsity without commonly rated items (DS-WO-CRI) problem, limiting their recommendation performance. Towards solving this challenging problem, we propose a novel tag and rating based collaborative filtering (CF) model for item recommendation, which first uses topic modeling to mine the semantic information of tags for each user and for each item respectively, and then incorporates the semantic information into matrix factorization to factorize rating information and to capture the bridging feature of tags and ratings between users and items.As a result, our model captures the semantic correlation between users and items, and is able to greatly improve recommendation performance, especially in DS-WO-CRI situations.Experiments conducted on two popular real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed model significantly outperforms the conventional CF approach, the state-of-the-art social relation based CF approach, and the state-of-the-art topic modeling based CF approaches in terms of both precision and recall, and it is an effective approach to the DS-WO-CRI problem.
Chaochao Chen 0001, Yan Wang 0002, Fuxing Hong, Deren Chen
AAAI4
2016 Latent space regularization for recommender systems
Fuxing Hong, Chaochao Chen 0001
Inf. Sci.1
2014 Context-Aware Collaborative Topic Regression with Social Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems
abstract
Online social networking sites have become popular platforms on which users can link with each other and share information, not only basic rating information but also information such as contexts, social relationships, and item contents. However, as far as we know, no existing works systematically combine diverse types of information to build more accurate recommender systems. In this paper, we propose a novel context-aware hierarchical Bayesian method. First, we propose the use of spectral clustering for user-item subgrouping, so that users and items in similar contexts are grouped. We then propose a novel hierarchical Bayesian model that can make predictions for each user-item subgroup, our model incorporate not only topic modeling to mine item content but also social matrix factorization to handle ratings and social relationships. Experiments on an Epinions dataset show that our method significantly improves recommendation performance compared with six categories of state-of-the-art recommendation methods in terms of both prediction accuracy and recall. We have also conducted experiments to study the extent to which ratings, contexts, social relationships, and item contents contribute to recommendation performance in terms of prediction accuracy and recall.
Chaochao Chen 0001, Yan Wang 0002, Fuxing Hong
AAAI4