Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Filipe Manco

dblp:149/9267 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%
Computer networks
2 papers
Software-defined and programmable networks · 39% Internet of things and sensor networks · 39% Internet architecture and protocols · 12%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
virtualization
0.522017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Towards the super fluid cloud · SIGCOMM 2014
Operating systems › virtualization
containers
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Operating systems › system security › operating system security › protection mechanism › isolation
container isolation
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › virtualization security
virtual machine isolation
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
in-network processing
0.212015
In-Net: in-network processing for the masses · EuroSys 2015
Software-defined and programmable networks
network function virtualization
0.212015
In-Net: in-network processing for the masses · EuroSys 2015
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › lightweight virtualization
lightweight virtual machines
0.212014
Towards the super fluid cloud · SIGCOMM 2014
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › virtual machine migration
live migration
0.212014
Towards the super fluid cloud · SIGCOMM 2014
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization
lightweight virtualization
0.112017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Internet architecture and protocols
middlebox
0.112015
In-Net: in-network processing for the masses · EuroSys 2015
Transport protocols and congestion control › multipath transport
multipath TCP
0.112014
Towards the super fluid cloud · SIGCOMM 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

isolation analysis · 0.6VM toolstack optimization · 0.6virtualization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container
abstract
Containers are in great demand because they are lightweight when compared to virtual machines. On the downside, containers offer weaker isolation than VMs, to the point where people run containers in virtual machines to achieve proper isolation. In this paper, we examine whether there is indeed a strict tradeoff between isolation (VMs) and efficiency (containers). We find that VMs can be as nimble as containers, as long as they are small and the toolstack is fast enough.
Filipe Manco, Costin Lupu, Florian Schmidt 0002, Jose Mendes, Simon Kuenzer, Sumit Sati, Kenichi Yasukata, Costin Raiciu, Felipe Huici
SOSP1
2017 Unikernels Everywhere: The Case for Elastic CDNs
abstract
Video streaming dominates the Internet's overall traffic mix, with reports stating that it will constitute 90% of all consumer traffic by 2019. Most of this video is delivered by Content Delivery Networks (CDNs), and, while they optimize QoE metrics such as buffering ratio and start-up time, no single CDN provides optimal performance. In this paper we make the case for elastic CDNs, the ability to build virtual CDNs on-the-fly on top of shared, third-party infrastructure at a scale. To bring this idea closer to reality we begin by large-scale simulations to quantify the effects that elastic CDNs would have if deployed, and build and evaluate MiniCache, a specialized, minimalistic virtualized content cache that runs on the Xen hypervisor. MiniCache is able to serve content at rates of up to 32 Gb/s and handle up to 600K reqs/sec on a single CPU core, as well as boot in about 90 milliseconds on x86 and around 370 milliseconds on ARM32.
Simon Kuenzer, Anton Ivanov, Filipe Manco, Jose Mendes, Yuri Volchkov, Florian Schmidt 0002, Kenichi Yasukata, Michio Honda, Felipe Huici
VEE3
2015 In-Net: in-network processing for the masses
abstract
Network Function Virtualization is pushing network operators to deploy commodity hardware that will be used to run middlebox functionality and processing on behalf of third parties: in effect, network operators are slowly but surely becoming in-network cloud providers. The market for innetwork clouds is large, ranging from content providers, mobile applications and even end-users.
Radu Stoenescu, Vladimir Andrei Olteanu, Matei Popovici, Mohamed Ahmed 0001, Roberto Bifulco, Filipe Manco, Felipe Huici, Georgios Smaragdakis, Mark Handley, Costin Raiciu
EuroSys7
2015 Enhancing the BRAS through virtualization
abstract
Broadband Remote Access Servers (BRASes) are crucial middleboxes in DSL access networks, providing the first IP point in the network for subscribers and enforcing operator policies. The number of functions provided by BRASes, combined with the key role they play in the network, means that these devices are expensive, difficult to change, and constitute a single point of failure. In order to overcome these limitations, we propose to virtualize the BRAS and to enhance it with a control interface that can be exploited by management systems in order to introduce live session migration and higher reliability. Our proof-of-concept implementation shows that our virtual software BRAS is able to handle thousands of sessions while forwarding and shaping traffic at rates of millions of packets per second on commodity hardware, and that the live session migration feature enables the implementation of high-reliability scenarios.
Thomas Dietz, Roberto Bifulco, Filipe Manco, Hans-Jörg Kolbe, Felipe Huici
NetSoft3
2014 Towards the super fluid cloud
abstract
Traditionally, the number of VMs running on a server and how quickly these can be migrated has been less than optimal mostly because of the memory and CPU requirements imposed on the system by the full-fledged OSes that the VMs run. More recently, work towards VMs based on minimalistic or specialized OSes has started pushing the envelope of how reactive or fluid the cloud can be. In this demo we will demonstrate how to concurrently execute thousands of Xen-based VMs on a single inexpensive server. We will also show instantiation and migraion of such VMs in tens of milliseconds, and transparent, wide area migration of virtualized middleboxes by combining such VMs with the multi-path TCP (MPTCP) protocol.
Filipe Manco, Felipe Huici
SIGCOMM1