Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steven Gold
dblp:15/1051
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 52% Mathematical optimization · 48% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.0 | 3 | 1996 | A Graduated Assignment Algorithm for Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 A Convergence Proof for the Softassign Quadratic Assignment Algorithm · NIPS 1996 Softassign versus Softmax: Benchmarks in Combinatorial Optimization · NIPS 1995 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching
graduated assignment |
0.0 | 2 | 1996 | A Graduated Assignment Algorithm for Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 Graph matching by graduated assignment · CVPR 1996 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching |
0.0 | 2 | 1996 | A Graduated Assignment Algorithm for Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 Graph matching by graduated assignment · CVPR 1996 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.0 | 2 | 1994 | Learning with Preknowledge: Clustering with Point and Graph Matching Distance Measures · NIPS 1994 Clustering with a Domain-Specific Distance Measure · NIPS 1993 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
assignment problem |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Graduated Assignment Algorithm for Graph Matching · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching › graph alignment
attributed graph alignment |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Graph matching by graduated assignment · CVPR 1996 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › assignment problem
quadratic assignment problem |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Convergence Proof for the Softassign Quadratic Assignment Algorithm · NIPS 1996 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
subgraph isomorphism |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Graph matching by graduated assignment · CVPR 1996 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching
correspondence problem |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Framework for Non-rigid Matching and Correspondence · NIPS 1995 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › shape matching
non-rigid shape matching |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Framework for Non-rigid Matching and Correspondence · NIPS 1995 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › activation function
softmax |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Softassign versus Softmax: Benchmarks in Combinatorial Optimization · NIPS 1995 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
graph matching |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Learning with Preknowledge: Clustering with Point and Graph Matching Distance Measures · NIPS 1994 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point set registration |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | New Algorithms for 2D and 3D Point Matching: Pose Estimation and Correspondence · NIPS 1994 |
Mathematical optimization › variational inference
mean field approximation |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | New Algorithms for 2D and 3D Point Matching: Pose Estimation and Correspondence · NIPS 1994 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Framework for Non-rigid Matching and Correspondence · NIPS 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deterministic annealing · 0.1softassign · 0.1non-rigid matching · 0.0projective scaling · 0.0EM-like dynamics · 0.0statistical physics · 0.0relaxation labeling · 0.0neural network · 0.0graduated non-convexity · 0.0constraint satisfaction · 0.0mean-field theory · 0.0mean field theory · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | New algorithms for 2D and 3D point matching: pose estimation and correspondenceabstractA fundamental open problem in computer vision—determining pose and correspondence between two sets of points in space—is solved with a novel, fast, robust and easily implementable algorithm. The technique works on noisy 2D or 3D point sets that may be of unequal sizes and may differ by non-rigid transformations. Using a combination of optimization techniques such as deterministic annealing and the softassign, which have recently emerged out of the recurrent neural network/statistical physics framework, analog objective functions describing the problems are minimized. Over thirty thousand experiments, on randomly generated points sets with varying amounts of noise and missing and spurious points, and on hand-written character sets demonstrate the robustness of the algorithm. Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001, Chien-Ping Lu, Suguna Pappu, Eric Mjolsness |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 1996 | Graph matching by graduated assignmentabstractA new algorithm for graph matching, which uses graduated assignment is presented, along with experimental results demonstrating large improvements in speed and accuracy over previous techniques. The softassign, a novel constraint satisfaction technique, is applied to a new graph matching energy function that uses a robust, sparse distance measure between the links of the two graphs. The softassign, which has emerged out of the neural network/statistical physics framework enforces two-way (assignment) constraints without the use of penalty terms. The algorithm's low order computational complexity [0(lm), where l and m are the number of links in the two graphs] compares favorably with most competing approaches. The method, not restricted to any special class of graph, is applied to subgraph isomorphism, weighted graph matching, and attributed relational graph matching. Experiments on graphs generated from images and on randomly generated graphs, including benchmarks against a relation labeling algorithm and an algorithm employing Potts glass dynamics are reported. Over twenty-five thousand experiments were conducted. No comparable results have been reported by any other graph matching algorithm before in the research literature. Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 1996 | A Convergence Proof for the Softassign Quadratic Assignment Algorithm
Anand Rangarajan 0001, Alan L. Yuille, Steven Gold, Eric Mjolsness |
NIPS | 3 |
| 1996 | A Novel Optimizing Network Architecture with ApplicationsabstractWe present a novel optimizing network architecture with applications in vision, learning, pattern recognition, and combinatorial optimization. This architecture is constructed by combining the following techniques: (1) deterministic annealing, (2) self-amplification, (3) algebraic transformations, (4) clocked objectives, and (5) softassign. Deterministic annealing in conjunction with self-amplification avoids poor local minima and ensures that a vertex of the hypercube is reached. Algebraic transformations and clocked objectives help partition the relaxation into distinct phases. The problems considered have doubly stochastic matrix constraints or minor variations thereof. We introduce a new technique, softassign, which is used to satisfy this constraint. Experimental results on different problems are presented and discussed. Anand Rangarajan 0001, Steven Gold, Eric Mjolsness |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 1996 | Learning with Preknowledge: Clustering with Point and Graph Matching Distance MeasuresabstractPrior knowledge constraints are imposed upon a learning problem in the form of distance measures. Prototypical 2D point sets and graphs are learned by clustering with point-matching and graph-matching distance measures. The point-matching distance measure is approximately invariant under affine transformations—translation, rotation, scale, and shear—and permutations. It operates between noisy images with missing and spurious points. The graph-matching distance measure operates on weighted graphs and is invariant under permutations. Learning is formulated as an optimization problem. Large objectives so formulated (∼ million variables) are efficiently minimized using a combination of optimization techniques—softassign, algebraic transformations, clocked objectives, and deterministic annealing. Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001, Eric Mjolsness |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 1996 | A Graduated Assignment Algorithm for Graph MatchingabstractA graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching is presented which is fast and accurate even in the presence of high noise. By combining graduated nonconvexity, two-way (assignment) constraints, and sparsity, large improvements in accuracy and speed are achieved. Its low order computational complexity [O(lm), where l and m are the number of links in the two graphs] and robustness in the presence of noise offer advantages over traditional combinatorial approaches. The algorithm, not restricted to any special class of graph, is applied to subgraph isomorphism, weighted graph matching, and attributed relational graph matching. To illustrate the performance of the algorithm, attributed relational graphs derived from objects are matched. Then, results from twenty-five thousand experiments conducted on 100 mode random graphs of varying types (graphs with only zero-one links, weighted graphs, and graphs with node attributes and multiple link types) are reported. No comparable results have been reported by any other graph matching algorithm before in the research literature. Twenty-five hundred control experiments are conducted using a relaxation labeling algorithm and large improvements in accuracy are demonstrated. Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 1995 | Softassign versus Softmax: Benchmarks in Combinatorial Optimization
Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001 |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1995 | A Framework for Non-rigid Matching and Correspondence
Suguna Pappu, Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001 |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1994 | New Algorithms for 2D and 3D Point Matching: Pose Estimation and CorrespondenceabstractA fundamental open problem in computer vision-determining pose and correspondence between two sets of points in space(cid:173) is solved with a novel, robust and easily implementable algorithm. The technique works on noisy point sets that may be of unequal sizes and may differ by non-rigid transformations. A 2D varia(cid:173) tion calculates the pose between point sets related by an affine transformation-translation, rotation, scale and shear. A 3D to 3D variation calculates translation and rotation. An objective describ(cid:173) ing the problem is derived from Mean field theory. The objective is minimized with clocked (EM-like) dynamics. Experiments with both handwritten and synthetic data provide empirical evidence for the method. Steven Gold, Chien-Ping Lu, Anand Rangarajan 0001, Suguna Pappu, Eric Mjolsness |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1994 | Learning with Preknowledge: Clustering with Point and Graph Matching Distance MeasuresabstractPrior constraints are imposed upon a learning problem in the form of distance measures. Prototypical 2-D point sets and graphs are learned by clustering with point matching and graph matching dis(cid:173) tance measures. The point matching distance measure is approx. invariant under affine transformations - translation, rotation, scale and shear - and permutations. It operates between noisy images with missing and spurious points. The graph matching distance measure operates on weighted graphs and is invariant under per(cid:173) mutations. Learning is formulated as an optimization problem . Large objectives so formulated ('" million variables) are efficiently minimized using a combination of optimization techniques - alge(cid:173) braic transformations, iterative projective scaling, clocked objec(cid:173) tives, and deterministic annealing. Steven Gold, Anand Rangarajan 0001, Eric Mjolsness |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1993 | Clustering with a Domain-Specific Distance Measure
Steven Gold, Eric Mjolsness, Anand Rangarajan 0001 |
NIPS | 1 |