Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mihály Geréb-Graus

dblp:15/1751 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 55% Algorithms and data structures · 45%
Network and information security
3 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 66% Privacy and data protection · 34%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.021995
Private Computations over the Integers · SIAM J. Comput. 1995
Private Computations Over the Integers (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Computational complexity
communication complexity
0.011995
Private Computations over the Integers · SIAM J. Comput. 1995
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
0.011992
The Average Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · SIAM J. Comput. 1992
Algorithms and data structures
parallel algorithms
0.011992
The Average Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · SIAM J. Comput. 1992
Algorithms and data structures › parallel algorithms
parallel merging
0.011992
The Average Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · SIAM J. Comput. 1992
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure distributed computation
0.011990
Private Computations Over the Integers (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.011987
The Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · FOCS 1987
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
parallel merging
0.011987
The Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · FOCS 1987
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.011987
The Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · FOCS 1987
Algorithms and data structures
sorting and merging
0.011987
The Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging · FOCS 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

privacy analysis · 0.0communication complexity bounds · 0.0parallel computation tree model · 0.0lower bound proof · 0.0worst-case lower bound · 0.0privacy protocols · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Private Computations over the Integers
abstract
The subject of this work is the possibility of private distributed computations of n-argument functions defined over the integers. A function f is t-private if there exists a protocol for computing f, so that no coalition of at most t participants can infer any additional information from the execution of the protocol. It is known that over finite domains every function can be computed $\lfloor (n - 1)/2 \rfloor $-privately. Some functions, like addition, are even n-private. We prove that this result cannot be extended to infinite domains. The possibility of privately computing f is shown to be closely related to the communication complexity of f. By using this relation, we show, for example, that n-argument addition is $\lfloor (n - 1)/2 \rfloor $-private over the nonnegative integers, but not even 1-private over all the integers. Finally, a complete characterization of t-private Boolean functions over countable domains is given. A Boolean function is 1-private if and only if its communication complexity is bounded. This characterization enables us to prove that every Boolean function falls into one of the following three categories: It is either n-private, $\lfloor (n - 1)/2 \rfloor $-private but not $\lceil n/2 \rceil$-private, or not 1-private.
Benny Chor, Mihály Geréb-Graus, Eyal Kushilevitz
SIAM J. Comput.2
1994 Three One-Way Heads Cannot Do String Matching
Mihály Geréb-Graus, Ming Li 0001
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1994 On the Structure of the Privacy Hierarchy
Benny Chor, Mihály Geréb-Graus, Eyal Kushilevitz
J. Cryptol.2
1992 Efficient Optical Communication in Parallel Computers
abstract
We study the problem of interprocessor communication in a parallel computer model suggested by recent Their algorithm is complicated as opposed to ours that we believe to be practical.Optimal interprocessor communication algorithms in realistic models of parallel computers are not only interesting in their own sake, they are one of the main components in optimally simulating PRAMs as well aa implementing Valiant's bulk-synchronous parallel model [13, 19, 18].
Mihály Geréb-Graus, Thanasis Tsantilas
SPAA1
1992 The Average Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging
abstract
An optimal lower bound on the average time required by any algorithm that merges two sorted lists on Valiant’s parallel computation tree model is proven.
Mihály Geréb-Graus, Danny Krizanc
SIAM J. Comput.1
1990 Private Computations Over the Integers (Extended Abstract)
abstract
The possibility of private distributed computations of n-argument functions defined over the integers is considered. A function f is t-private if there exists a protocol for computing f so that no coalition of>
Benny Chor, Mihály Geréb-Graus, Eyal Kushilevitz
FOCS2
1989 There are no p-Complete Families of Symmetric Boolean Functions
Mihály Geréb-Graus, Ramamohan Paturi, Endre Szemerédi
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1988 On the Influence of Single Participant in Coin Flipping Schemes
abstract
This paper proves that in a one-round fair coin flipping scheme with n participants, either the average influence of all participants is at least $3/n - o( 1/n )$, or there is at least one participant whose influence is $\Omega ( n^{ - 5 /6} )$.
Benny Chor, Mihály Geréb-Graus
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
1987 The Complexity of Parallel Comparison Merging
abstract
We prove a worst case lower bound of Ω(log log n) for randomized algorithms merging two sorted lists of length n in parallel using n processors on Valiant's parallel computation tree model. We show how to strengthen this result to a lower bound for the expected time taken by any algorithm on the uniform distribution. Finally, bounds are given for the average time required for the problem when the number of processors is less than and greater than n.
Mihály Geréb-Graus, Danny Krizanc
FOCS1