Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabio Magnino

dblp:15/2447 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › synchronization
deadlock analysis
0.012000
A Petri Net Approach to Deadlock Analysis for Classes of Kanban Systems · ICRA 2000
Embedded and real-time systems
manufacturing systems
0.012000
A Petri Net Approach to Deadlock Analysis for Classes of Kanban Systems · ICRA 2000
Automata and formal languages
petri nets
0.012000
A Petri Net Approach to Deadlock Analysis for Classes of Kanban Systems · ICRA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

siphon analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 A Petri Net Approach to Deadlock Analysis for Classes of Kanban Systems
abstract
Considers the use of Petri nets for the study of the deadlock problem for two classes of kanban manufacturing systems: kanban flow lines and reentrant kanban flow lines. In the Petri net framework deadlock can be easily characterized by means of the siphon concept. The first result of the paper is the formal proof that kanban flow lines are deadlock free, regardless of the initial marking of the underlying Petri net. Vice versa, for the class of reentrant kanban flow lines, where resource sharing occurs, by means of simple examples we show that deadlock can actually occur. Formal results for the latter class are given, characterizing some fundamental properties of "critical" siphons i.e., siphons that may become empty leading to deadlock.
Fabio Magnino, Paolo Valigi
ICRA1