Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code generation, offering developers groundbreaking automated programming support. However, LLMs often generate code that is syntactically correct and even semantically plausible, but may not execute as expected or fulfill specified requirements. This phenomenon of hallucinations in the code domain has not been systematically explored. To advance the community's understanding and research on this issue, we introduce the concept of code hallucinations and propose a classification method for code hallucination based on execution verification. We categorize code hallucinations into four main types: mapping, naming, resource, and logic hallucinations, with each category further divided into different subcategories to understand and address the unique challenges faced by LLMs in code generation with finer granularity. Additionally, we present a dynamic detection algorithm called CodeHalu designed to detect and quantify code hallucinations. We also introduce the CodeHaluEval benchmark, which includes 8,883 samples from 699 tasks, to systematically and quantitatively evaluate code hallucinations. By evaluating 17 popular LLMs using this benchmark, we reveal significant differences in their accuracy and reliability in code generation, offering detailed insights for further improving the code generation capabilities of LLMs.

Despite tremendous advancements, current state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are still far from perfect.They tend to hallucinate and may generate biased responses.In such circumstances, having a way to assess the reliability of a given response generated by a VLM is quite useful.Existing methods, such as estimating uncertainty using answer likelihoods or prompt-based confidence generation, often suffer from overconfidence.Other methods use self-consistency comparison but are affected by confirmation biases.To alleviate these, we propose Decompose and Compare Consistency (DeCC) for reliability measurement.By comparing the consistency between the direct answer generated using the VLM's internal reasoning process, and the indirect answers obtained by decomposing the question into sub-questions and reasoning over the sub-answers produced by the VLM, DeCC measures the reliability of VLM's direct answer.Experiments across six vision-language tasks with three VLMs show DeCC's reliability estimation achieves better correlation with task accuracy compared to the existing methods.The code is publicly available at https: //github.com/MyLittleChange/DeCC.

Multi-modal multi-hop question answering involves answering a question by reasoning over multiple input sources from different modalities. Existing methods often retrieve evidences separately and then use a language model to generate an answer based on the retrieved evidences, and thus do not adequately connect candidates and are unable to model the interdependent relations during retrieval. Moreover, the pipelined approaches of retrieval and generation might result in poor generation performance when retrieval performance is low. To address these issues, we propose a Structured Knowledge and Unified Retrieval-Generation (SKURG) approach. SKURG employs an Entity-centered Fusion Encoder to align sources from different modalities using shared entities. It then uses a unified Retrieval-Generation Decoder to integrate intermediate retrieval results for answer generation and also adaptively determine the number of retrieval steps. Extensive experiments on two representative multi-modal multi-hop QA datasets MultimodalQA and WebQA demonstrate that SKURG outperforms the state-of-the-art models in both source retrieval and answer generation performance with fewer parameters1.

Deep convolutional neuralnetworks have achieved fairly high accuracy for single online handwritten Chinese character recognition (SOLHCCR). However, in real application scenarios, users always write multiple characters to form a complete sentence, and previous contextual information holds significant potential for improving the accuracy, robustness and efficiency of recognition. In this work, we first propose a simple and straightforward model named the vanilla compositional network (VCN) by coupling convolutional neural network with a sequence modeling architecture (i.e., a recurrent neural network or Transformer), which exploits the handwritten character’s previous contextual information. Although VCN performs much better than the previous state-of-the-art SOLHCCR models, it is a two-stage architecture in nature. It suffers from high fragility when confronting with poorly written characters such as sloppy writing, and missing or broken strokes, due to relying heavily on contextual information. To improve the robustness of the OLHCCR model, we further propose a novel deep spatial & contextual information fusion network (DSCIFN). It utilizes an autoregresssive framework pre-trained on a large-scale sentence corpora as the backbone component, and highly integrates the spatial features of handwritten characters and their previous contextual information in a multi-layer fusion module. To verify the effectiveness of models, we reorganize a new form of online Chinese handwritten character with its previous context dataset, named OHCCC. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that DSCIFN achieves state-of-the-art performance and has increased strong robustness compared to VCN and previous SOLHCCR models. The in-depth empirical analysis and case study indicate that DSCIFN can significantly improve the efficiency of handwriting input because it does not need complete strokes to recognize a handwritten Chinese character precisely.

Visual Entailment with natural language explanations aims to infer the relationship between a text-image pair and generate a sentence to explain the decision-making process. Previous methods rely mainly on a pre-trained vision-language model to perform the relation inference and a language model to generate the corresponding explanation. However, the pre-trained vision-language models mainly build token-level alignment between text and image yet ignore the high-level semantic alignment between the phrases (chunks) and visual contents, which is critical for vision-language reasoning. Moreover, the explanation generator based only on the encoded joint representation does not explicitly consider the critical decision-making points of relation inference. Thus the generated explanations are less faithful to visual-language reasoning. To mitigate these problems, we propose a unified Chunk-aware Alignment and Lexical Constraint based method, dubbed as CALeC. It contains a Chunk-aware Semantic Interactor (arr. CSI), a relation inferrer, and a Lexical Constraint-aware Generator (arr. LeCG). Specifically, CSI exploits the sentence structure inherent in language and various image regions to build chunk-aware semantic alignment. Relation inferrer uses an attention-based reasoning network to incorporate the token-level and chunk-level vision-language representations. LeCG utilizes lexical constraints to expressly incorporate the words or chunks focused by the relation inferrer into explanation generation, improving the faithfulness and informativeness of the explanations. We conduct extensive experiments on three datasets, and experimental results indicate that CALeC significantly outperforms other competitor models on inference accuracy and quality of generated explanations.