Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Hübler

dblp:15/3296 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.112008
Metropolis Algorithms for Representative Subgraph Sampling · ICDM 2008
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph sampling
0.112008
Metropolis Algorithms for Representative Subgraph Sampling · ICDM 2008
Mathematical optimization
metropolis algorithm
0.112008
Metropolis Algorithms for Representative Subgraph Sampling · ICDM 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov chain monte carlo · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Metropolis Algorithms for Representative Subgraph Sampling
abstract
While data mining in chemoinformatics studied graph data with dozens of nodes, systems biology and the Internet are now generating graph data with thousands and millions of nodes. Hence data mining faces the algorithmic challenge of coping with this significant increase in graph size: Classic algorithms for data analysis are often too expensive and too slow on large graphs. While one strategy to overcome this problem is to design novel efficient algorithms, the other is to 'reduce' the size of the large graph by sampling. This is the scope of this paper: We will present novel Metropolis algorithms for sampling a 'representative' small subgraph from the original large graph, with 'representative' describing the requirement that the sample shall preserve crucial graph properties of the original graph. In our experiments, we improve over the pioneering work of Leskovec and Faloutsos (KDD 2006), by producing representative subgraph samples that are both smaller and of higher quality than those produced by other methods from the literature.
Christian Hübler, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Karsten M. Borgwardt, Zoubin Ghahramani
ICDM1