Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel W. Watson

dblp:15/3368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Coding theory · 33%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel optimization
parallel metaheuristic
0.011998
Parallel Genetic Simulated Annealing: A Massively Parallel SIMD Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1998
Parallel and multicore computing › data parallelism
SIMD vectorization
0.011998
Parallel Genetic Simulated Annealing: A Massively Parallel SIMD Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1998
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.011998
Parallel Genetic Simulated Annealing: A Massively Parallel SIMD Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1998
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › code construction
error-correcting code construction
0.011998
Parallel Genetic Simulated Annealing: A Massively Parallel SIMD Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1998
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem
0.011998
Parallel Genetic Simulated Annealing: A Massively Parallel SIMD Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.0genetic algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A comparative study of the parallel wavelet-based clustering algorithm on three-dimensional dataset
Ahmet Artu Yildirim, Daniel W. Watson
J. Supercomput.2
1999 Aspects of computational mode and data distribution for parallel range image segmentation
Nicholas Giolmas, Daniel W. Watson, David M. Chelberg, Peter V. Henstock, June-Ho Yi, Howard Jay Siegel
Parallel Comput.2
1998 Generational Scheduling for Dynamic Task Management in Heterogenous Computing Systems
Brent R. Carter, Daniel W. Watson, Richard F. Freund, Elaine G. Keith, Francesca Mirabile, Howard Jay Siegel
Inf. Sci.2
1998 Parallel Genetic Simulated Annealing: A Massively Parallel SIMD Algorithm
abstract
Many significant engineering and scientific problems involve optimization of some criteria over a combinatorial configuration space. The two methods most often used to solve these problems effectively-simulated annealing (SA) and genetic algorithms (GA)-do not easily lend themselves to massive parallel implementations. Simulated annealing is a naturally serial algorithm, while GA involves a selection process that requires global coordination. This paper introduces a new hybrid algorithm that inherits those aspects of GA that lend themselves to parallelization, and avoids serial bottle-necks of GA approaches by incorporating elements of SA to provide a completely parallel, easily scalable hybrid GA/SA method. This new method, called Genetic Simulated Annealing, does not require parallelization of any problem specific portions of a serial implementation-existing serial implementations can be incorporated as is. Results of a study on two difficult combinatorial optimization problems, a 100 city traveling salesperson problem and a 24 word, 12 bit error correcting code design problem, performed on a 16 K PE MasPar MP-1, indicate advantages over previous parallel GA and SA approaches. One of the key results is that the performance of the algorithm scales up linearly with the increase of processing elements, a feature not demonstrated by any previous parallel GA or SA approaches, which enables the new algorithm to utilize massive parallel architecture with maximum effectiveness. Additionally, the algorithm does not require careful choice of control parameters, a significant advantage over SA and GA.
Nicholas S. Flann, Daniel W. Watson
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3
1997 Determining the Execution Time Distribution for a Data Parallel Program in a Heterogeneous Computing Environment
Yan Alexander Li, John K. Antonio, Howard Jay Siegel, Min Tan 0002, Daniel W. Watson
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.5
1994 A Block-Based Mode Selection Model for SIMD/SPMD Parallel Environments
Daniel W. Watson, Howard Jay Siegel, John K. Antonio, Mark A. Nichols, Mikhail J. Atallah
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.1
1991 Aspects of mapping tasks onto parallel processing systems
abstract
A discussion of how three algorithms can map onto parallel processing systems is presented. Issues addressed are single instruction multiple data (SIMD)/multiple instruction multiple data (MIMD) tradeoffs, mixed-mode parallelism, the impact of partitioning the system for subtask parallelism, the effect on execution time of increasing the number of processors used, and the advantages of a flexible interprocessor communications network.>
Howard Jay Siegel, James B. Armstrong, Daniel W. Watson, Wayne G. Nation, Mark Allemang
COMPSAC3