Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wajahat F. Khan

dblp:15/4140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Wireless networking · 91% Physical-layer communications · 9%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › medium access control
backoff algorithm
0.222010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · INFOCOM 2008
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.222010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · INFOCOM 2008
Wireless networking › medium access control
multi-packet reception
0.222010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · INFOCOM 2008
Physical-layer communications
MIMO
0.122010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · INFOCOM 2008
Wireless networking › wireless transmission
UWB
0.012010
MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2markovian analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes
abstract
The physical layer of future wireless networks will be based on novel radio technologies such as UWB and MIMO. One of the important capabilities of such technologies is the ability to capture a few packets simultaneously. This capability has the potential to improve the performance of the MAC layer. However, we show that in networks with spatially distributed nodes, reusing backoff mechanisms originally designed for narrow-band systems (e.g., CSMA/CA) is inefficient. It is well known that when networks with spatially distributed nodes operate with such MAC protocols, the channel may be captured by nodes that are near the destination, leading to unfairness. We show that when the physical layer enables multipacket reception, the negative implications of reusing the legacy protocols include not only such unfairness, but also a significant throughput reduction. We present alternative backoff mechanisms and evaluate their performance via Markovian analysis, approximations, and simulation. We show that our alternative backoff mechanisms can improve both overall throughput and fairness.
Güner D. Çelik, Gil Zussman, Wajahat F. Khan, Eytan H. Modiano
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.3
2008 MAC for Networks with Multipacket Reception Capability and Spatially Distributed Nodes
abstract
The physical layer of future wireless networks will be based on novel radio technologies such as UWB and MIMO. One of the important capabilities of such technologies is the ability to capture a few packets simultaneously. This capability has the potential to improve the performance of the MAC layer. However, we show that in networks with spatially distributed nodes, reusing backoff mechanisms originally designed for narrow-band systems (e.g. CSMA/CA) is inefficient. It is well known that when networks with spatially distributed nodes operate with such MAC protocols, the channel may be captured by nodes that are near the destination, leading to unfairness. We show that when the physical layer enables multipacket reception, the negative implications of reusing the legacy protocols include not only such unfairness but also a significant throughput reduction. We present alternative backoff mechanisms and evaluate their performance via Markovian analysis and simulation. We show that our alternative backoff mechanisms can improve both overall throughput and fairness.
Güner D. Çelik, Gil Zussman, Wajahat F. Khan, Eytan H. Modiano
INFOCOM3