Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linus Ericsson
dblp:150/5139
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0634-5072ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 46% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | einspace: Searching for Neural Architectures from Fundamental Operations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
search space design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | einspace: Searching for Neural Architectures from Fundamental Operations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised visual representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › transferability estimation
transfer evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
dense prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic context-free grammar · 0.8evolutionary search · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.5linear probing · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PlainMamba: Improving Non-Hierarchical Mamba in Visual Recognition
Chenhongyi Yang, Miguel Espinosa, Linus Ericsson, Elliot Crowley |
BMVC | 4 |
| 2024 | einspace: Searching for Neural Architectures from Fundamental OperationsabstractNeural architecture search (NAS) finds high performing networks for a given task. Yet the results of NAS are fairly prosaic; they did not e.g. create a shift from convolutional structures to transformers. This is not least because the search spaces in NAS often aren’t diverse enough to include such transformations *a priori*. Instead, for NAS to provide greater potential for fundamental design shifts, we need a novel expressive search space design which is built from more fundamental operations. To this end, we introduce `einspace`, a search space based on a parameterised probabilistic context-free grammar. Our space is versatile, supporting architectures of various sizes and complexities, while also containing diverse network operations which allow it to model convolutions, attention components and more. It contains many existing competitive architectures, and provides flexibility for discovering new ones. Using this search space, we perform experiments to find novel architectures as well as improvements on existing ones on the diverse Unseen NAS datasets. We show that competitive architectures can be obtained by searching from scratch, and we consistently find large improvements when initialising the search with strong baselines. We believe that this work is an important advancement towards a transformative NAS paradigm where search space expressivity and strategic search initialisation play key roles. Linus Ericsson, Miguel Espinosa, Chenhongyi Yang, Antreas Antoniou, Amos J. Storkey, Shay B. Cohen, Elliot Crowley |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Label-efficient object detection via region proposal network pre-trainingabstractSelf-supervised pre-training, based on the pretext task of instance discrimination, has fueled the recent advance in label-efficient object detection. However, existing studies focus on pre-training only a feature extractor network to learn transferable representations for downstream detection tasks. This leads to the necessity of training multiple detection-specific modules from scratch in the fine-tuning phase. We argue that the region proposal network (RPN), a common detection-specific module, can additionally be pre-trained towards reducing the localization error of multi-stage detectors. In this work, we propose a simple pretext task that provides an effective pre-training for the RPN, towards efficiently improving downstream object detection performance. We evaluate the efficacy of our approach on benchmark object detection tasks and additional downstream tasks, including instance segmentation and few-shot detection. In comparison with multi-stage detectors without RPN pre-training, our approach is able to consistently improve downstream task performance, with largest gains found in label-scarce settings. Nanqing Dong, Linus Ericsson, Yongxin Yang, Ales Leonardis, Steven McDonagh 0001 |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2022 | Why Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? On the Impact of Invariance on Downstream Tasks
Linus Ericsson, Henry Gouk, Timothy M. Hospedales |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2021 | How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?abstractSelf-supervised visual representation learning has seen huge progress recently, but no large scale evaluation has compared the many models now available. We evaluate the transfer performance of 13 top self-supervised models on 40 downstream tasks, including many-shot and few-shot recognition, object detection, and dense prediction. We compare their performance to a supervised baseline and show that on most tasks the best self-supervised models outperform supervision, confirming the recently observed trend in the literature. We find ImageNet Top-1 accuracy to be highly correlated with transfer to many-shot recognition, but increasingly less so for few-shot, object detection and dense prediction. No single self-supervised method dominates overall, suggesting that universal pre-training is still unsolved. Our analysis of features suggests that top self-supervised learners fail to preserve colour information as well as supervised alternatives, but tend to induce better classifier calibration, and less attentive overfitting than supervised learners. Linus Ericsson, Henry Gouk, Timothy M. Hospedales |
CVPR | 1 |