Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linus Ericsson

dblp:150/5139 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0634-5072ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 46% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.812024
einspace: Searching for Neural Architectures from Fundamental Operations · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
search space design
0.812024
einspace: Searching for Neural Architectures from Fundamental Operations · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised visual representation learning
0.512021
How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › transferability estimation
transfer evaluation
0.512021
How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
dense prediction
0.112021
How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic context-free grammar · 0.8evolutionary search · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.5linear probing · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 PlainMamba: Improving Non-Hierarchical Mamba in Visual Recognition
Chenhongyi Yang, Miguel Espinosa, Linus Ericsson, Elliot Crowley
BMVC4
2024 einspace: Searching for Neural Architectures from Fundamental Operations
abstract
Neural architecture search (NAS) finds high performing networks for a given task. Yet the results of NAS are fairly prosaic; they did not e.g. create a shift from convolutional structures to transformers. This is not least because the search spaces in NAS often aren’t diverse enough to include such transformations *a priori*. Instead, for NAS to provide greater potential for fundamental design shifts, we need a novel expressive search space design which is built from more fundamental operations. To this end, we introduce `einspace`, a search space based on a parameterised probabilistic context-free grammar. Our space is versatile, supporting architectures of various sizes and complexities, while also containing diverse network operations which allow it to model convolutions, attention components and more. It contains many existing competitive architectures, and provides flexibility for discovering new ones. Using this search space, we perform experiments to find novel architectures as well as improvements on existing ones on the diverse Unseen NAS datasets. We show that competitive architectures can be obtained by searching from scratch, and we consistently find large improvements when initialising the search with strong baselines. We believe that this work is an important advancement towards a transformative NAS paradigm where search space expressivity and strategic search initialisation play key roles.
Linus Ericsson, Miguel Espinosa, Chenhongyi Yang, Antreas Antoniou, Amos J. Storkey, Shay B. Cohen, Elliot Crowley
NeurIPS1
2024 Label-efficient object detection via region proposal network pre-training
abstract
Self-supervised pre-training, based on the pretext task of instance discrimination, has fueled the recent advance in label-efficient object detection. However, existing studies focus on pre-training only a feature extractor network to learn transferable representations for downstream detection tasks. This leads to the necessity of training multiple detection-specific modules from scratch in the fine-tuning phase. We argue that the region proposal network (RPN), a common detection-specific module, can additionally be pre-trained towards reducing the localization error of multi-stage detectors. In this work, we propose a simple pretext task that provides an effective pre-training for the RPN, towards efficiently improving downstream object detection performance. We evaluate the efficacy of our approach on benchmark object detection tasks and additional downstream tasks, including instance segmentation and few-shot detection. In comparison with multi-stage detectors without RPN pre-training, our approach is able to consistently improve downstream task performance, with largest gains found in label-scarce settings.
Nanqing Dong, Linus Ericsson, Yongxin Yang, Ales Leonardis, Steven McDonagh 0001
Neurocomputing2
2022 Why Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? On the Impact of Invariance on Downstream Tasks
Linus Ericsson, Henry Gouk, Timothy M. Hospedales
BMVC1
2021 How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?
abstract
Self-supervised visual representation learning has seen huge progress recently, but no large scale evaluation has compared the many models now available. We evaluate the transfer performance of 13 top self-supervised models on 40 downstream tasks, including many-shot and few-shot recognition, object detection, and dense prediction. We compare their performance to a supervised baseline and show that on most tasks the best self-supervised models outperform supervision, confirming the recently observed trend in the literature. We find ImageNet Top-1 accuracy to be highly correlated with transfer to many-shot recognition, but increasingly less so for few-shot, object detection and dense prediction. No single self-supervised method dominates overall, suggesting that universal pre-training is still unsolved. Our analysis of features suggests that top self-supervised learners fail to preserve colour information as well as supervised alternatives, but tend to induce better classifier calibration, and less attentive overfitting than supervised learners.
Linus Ericsson, Henry Gouk, Timothy M. Hospedales
CVPR1