Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Ramon Janssen

dblp:150/7926 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › model learning
automata learning
0.212016
Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze TCP Implementations · CAV (2) 2016
Software testing
model learning
0.212016
Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze TCP Implementations · CAV (2) 2016
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.212016
Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze TCP Implementations · CAV (2) 2016
Transport protocols and congestion control
TCP
0.112016
Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze TCP Implementations · CAV (2) 2016
Transport protocols and congestion control
transport protocols
0.112016
Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze TCP Implementations · CAV (2) 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model learning · 0.8model checking · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Combining Partial Specifications using Alternating Interface Automata
Ramon Janssen
FASE1
2019 Relating Alternating Relations for Conformance and Refinement
Ramon Janssen, Frits W. Vaandrager, Jan Tretmans
IFM1
2019 n-Complete test suites for IOCO
abstract
An n -complete test suite for automata guarantees to detect all faulty implementations with a bounded number of states. We propose a construction of such a test suite for ioco conformance on labeled transition systems, which we derive from construction methods for deterministic FSMs. Our resulting test suite poses no further restrictions on the implementations other than their number of states and fairness in test execution. This elevates restrictions made in existing methods. In particular, we address the problem of compatible states : specification states which can be implemented by a single state. Such states are forbidden by existing methods for ioco, as they complicate test suite construction.
Petra van den Bos, Ramon Janssen, Joshua Moerman
Softw. Qual. J.2
2017 n-Complete Test Suites for IOCO
Petra van den Bos, Ramon Janssen, Joshua Moerman
ICTSS2
2016 Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze TCP Implementations
Paul Fiterau-Brostean, Ramon Janssen, Frits W. Vaandrager
CAV (2)2
2014 Learning Fragments of the TCP Network Protocol
Paul Fiterau-Brostean, Ramon Janssen, Frits W. Vaandrager
FMICS2