Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sam Regenbogen

dblp:151/3226 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-8588-4911ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 58% Knowledge graphs · 42%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-protein interaction prediction
0.212015
Predicting Future Scientific Discoveries Based on a Networked Analysis of the Past Literature · KDD 2015
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph reasoning
0.212015
Predicting Future Scientific Discoveries Based on a Networked Analysis of the Past Literature · KDD 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
literature-based discovery
0.212014
Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature · KDD 2014
Data mining › text mining › information extraction
entity extraction
0.212014
Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature · KDD 2014
Data mining
text mining
0.212014
Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature · KDD 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document analysis › scholarly text analysis
scientific information extraction
0.112015
Predicting Future Scientific Discoveries Based on a Networked Analysis of the Past Literature · KDD 2015
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.112014
Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature · KDD 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network analysis · 0.7matrix factorization · 0.7graph diffusion · 0.7neighbor-text feature analysis · 0.4graph-based diffusion · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Predicting Future Scientific Discoveries Based on a Networked Analysis of the Past Literature
abstract
We present KnIT, the Knowledge Integration Toolkit, a system for accelerating scientific discovery and predicting previously unknown protein-protein interactions. Such predictions enrich biological research and are pertinent to drug discovery and the understanding of disease. Unlike a prior study, KnIT is now fully automated and demonstrably scalable. It extracts information from the scientific literature, automatically identifying direct and indirect references to protein interactions, which is knowledge that can be represented in network form. It then reasons over this network with techniques such as matrix factorization and graph diffusion to predict new, previously unknown interactions. The accuracy and scope of KnIT's knowledge extractions are validated using comparisons to structured, manually curated data sources as well as by performing retrospective studies that predict subsequent literature discoveries using literature available prior to a given date. The KnIT methodology is a step towards automated hypothesis generation from text, with potential application to other scientific domains.
Meena Nagarajan, Angela D. Wilkins, Benjamin J. Bachman, Ilya B. Novikov, Shenghua Bao, Peter J. Haas, María E. Terrón-Díaz, Sumit Bhatia, Anbu K. Adikesavan, Jacques J. Labrie, Sam Regenbogen, Christie M. Buchovecky, Curtis R. Pickering, Linda Kato, Andreas Martin Lisewski, Ana Lelescu, Houyin Zhang, Stephen Boyer, Griff Weber, Ying Chen 0001, Lawrence A. Donehower, W. Scott Spangler, Olivier Lichtarge
KDD11
2014 Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature
abstract
Keeping up with the ever-expanding flow of data and publications is untenable and poses a fundamental bottleneck to scientific progress. Current search technologies typically find many relevant documents, but they do not extract and organize the information content of these documents or suggest new scientific hypotheses based on this organized content. We present an initial case study on KnIT, a prototype system that mines the information contained in the scientific literature, represents it explicitly in a queriable network, and then further reasons upon these data to generate novel and experimentally testable hypotheses. KnIT combines entity detection with neighbor-text feature analysis and with graph-based diffusion of information to identify potential new properties of entities that are strongly implied by existing relationships. We discuss a successful application of our approach that mines the published literature to identify new protein kinases that phosphorylate the protein tumor suppressor p53. Retrospective analysis demonstrates the accuracy of this approach and ongoing laboratory experiments suggest that kinases identified by our system may indeed phosphorylate p53. These results establish proof of principle for automated hypothesis generation and discovery based on text mining of the scientific literature.
W. Scott Spangler, Angela D. Wilkins, Benjamin J. Bachman, Meena Nagarajan, Tajhal Dayaram, Peter J. Haas, Sam Regenbogen, Curtis R. Pickering, Austin Comer, Jeffrey N. Myers, Ioana Stanoi, Linda Kato, Ana Lelescu, Jacques J. Labrie, Neha Parikh, Andreas Martin Lisewski, Lawrence A. Donehower, Ying Chen 0001, Olivier Lichtarge
KDD7