Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Willard G. Bouricius

dblp:151/4729 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1973
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Electronic design automation · 43% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 31% Distributed systems · 15%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.021971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Programmed Algorithms to Compute Tests to Detect and Distinguish Between Failures in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.021971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Programmed Algorithms to Compute Tests to Detect and Distinguish Between Failures in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling
0.021973
Reliability Modeling for Fault-Tolerant Computers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction
error-correcting codes
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Memory systems › magnetic memory
magnetic bubble memory
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
memory fault tolerance
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
failure recovery
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation
0.011971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation
diagnostic test generation
0.011967
Programmed Algorithms to Compute Tests to Detect and Distinguish Between Failures in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault detection
0.011967
Programmed Algorithms to Compute Tests to Detect and Distinguish Between Failures in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967
Operating systems › system architecture
hardware-software interface
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Operating systems › fault tolerance
system recovery
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing
0.011971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-checking circuit design · 0.0error-correcting codes · 0.0recovery control unit · 0.0mathematical reliability modeling · 0.0macroblock test generation · 0.0iterative test generation · 0.0d-notation · 0.0d-cube calculus · 0.0audit routines · 0.0DALG-II · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1973 Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability
abstract
This paper reports a study on the design and modeling of a highly reliable bubble-memory system. This system has the capability of correcting a single 16-adjacent bit-group error resulting from failures in a single basic storage module (BSM), and detecting with a probability greater than 0.99 any double errors resulting from failures in BSM's. The encoding/decoding network (memory translator) is designed to be self-checking, i.e., a single circuit failure in the translator wiH not produce an erroneous output that goes undetected. The system is able to perform reliable configuration in the event of uncorrectable BSM failures, memory translator failures, and dual-memory buffer failures; even in the presence of a single failure in the status registers controlling the configuration network. The bubble memory under study permits serial accessing of the store with 64 x 1024 bit blocks at a 100-kHz rate. The objective of this study is to develop good fault-tolerant design and analysis methods adequate for newly emerging technologies and prove the practicality by example. The reliability modeling study justifies the design philosophy adopted of employing memory data encoding and a translator to correct single group errors and detect double group errors to enhance the overall system reliability. By a proper design of the memory translator based on a new checking technique, a uniformly high percentage of multiple b-adjacent bit-group error detection is achieved through the use of a proposed code (detects 99.99695 percent of double b-adjacent bit-group errors and 99.9985 percent of triple or more b-adjacent bit-group errors).
Willard G. Bouricius, William C. Carter, Edward P. Hsieh, Donald C. Jessep Jr., Aspi B. Wadia
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1971 Reliability Modeling for Fault-Tolerant Computers
abstract
Reliability modeling and the mathematical equations involved are discussed for general computer systems organized to be fault tolerant. This paper summarizes the work done over the last four years on mathematical reliability modeling by the authors.
Willard G. Bouricius, William C. Carter, Donald C. Jessep, Peter R. Schneider, Aspi B. Wadia
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1971 Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits
abstract
Programmed algorithms for test generation and test evaluation are described. The D-notation is introduced and a test generator (DALG) for combinational logic is presented. The sequential case is then examined. "Real life" constraints related to LSI testing are discussed. Two heuristic test generators satisfying these constraints are introduced. The iterative test generator (ITG) generates tests by transforming the given sequential circuit into an iterative combinational circuit. The macroblock test generator (MTG) uses the same approach but makes use of complex primitives (latches, triggers, etc.) to represent the circuit to be tested. Both the ITG and the MTG are not always guaranteed to generate good tests for each examined failure, and are used in connection with a test evaluator (simulator). Basic features of this evaluator are discussed.
Willard G. Bouricius, Edward P. Hsieh, Gianfranco R. Putzolu, J. Paul Roth, Peter R. Schneider, Chung-Jen Tan
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1971 Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery
abstract
Recovery in a fault-tolerant computer means the continuation of system operation with data integrity after an error occurs. This paper delineates two parallel concepts embodied in the hardware and software functions required for recovery; detection, diagnosis, and reconfiguration for hardware, data integrity, checkpointing, and restart for the software. The hardware relies on the recovery variable set, checking circuits, and diagnostics, and the software relies on the recovery information set, audit, and reconstruct routines, to characterize the system state and assist in recovery when required. Of particular utility is a handware unit, the recovery control unit, which serves as an interface between error detection and software recovery programs in the supervisor and provides dynamic interactive recovery.
William C. Carter, Donald C. Jessep, Aspi B. Wadia, Peter R. Schneider, Willard G. Bouricius
IEEE Trans. Computers5
1967 Programmed Algorithms to Compute Tests to Detect and Distinguish Between Failures in Logic Circuits
abstract
Two algorithms are presented: one, DALG-II, computes a test to detect a failure in acyclic logic circuits; the other, TEST-DETECT, ascertains all failures detected by a given test. Both are based upon the utilization of a ``calculus of D-cubes'' that provides the means for effectively performing the necessary computations for very large logic circuits. Strategies for combining the two algorithms into an efficient diagnostic test generation procedure are given. APL specifications of the algorithms are given in an Appendix.
J. Paul Roth, Willard G. Bouricius, Peter R. Schneider
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput.2