Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Bushnell

dblp:151/5677 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8140-0131ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics
1.222026
Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection · Bioinform. 2026
Omega: an Overlap-graph de novo Assembler for Metagenomics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › microbiology
virus-host interaction
1.012026
Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.212014
Omega: an Overlap-graph de novo Assembler for Metagenomics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly › de novo assembly
overlap-graph assembly
0.212014
Omega: an Overlap-graph de novo Assembler for Metagenomics · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence alignment · 1.0benchmarking · 1.0minimum cost flow analysis · 0.2mate-pair scaffolding · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection
abstract
MOTIVATION: CRISPR spacer-protospacer matching is widely used to infer host-virus interactions in microbial and viromics studies, but the choice of sequence search or alignment tool and its reporting behavior is often under-evaluated for this specific task. RESULTS: Using synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real datasets, we benchmarked commonly used tools and observed substantial differences in recall, runtime, and resource usage across distance metrics and thresholds. Our analyses support practical defaults for large-scale spacer-target matching and clarify trade-offs between exhaustive and heuristic approaches. AVAILABILITY: Source code and benchmark workflows are available at https://github.com/UriNeri/spacer_matching_bench. Data and run artifacts are archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15171878).
Uri Neri, Antonio Pedro Camargo, Brian Bushnell, Rick Beeloo, Simon Roux
Bioinform.3
2014 Omega: an Overlap-graph de novo Assembler for Metagenomics
abstract
MOTIVATION: Metagenomic sequencing allows reconstruction of microbial genomes directly from environmental samples. Omega (overlap-graph metagenome assembler) was developed for assembling and scaffolding Illumina sequencing data of microbial communities. RESULTS: Omega found overlaps between reads using a prefix/suffix hash table. The overlap graph of reads was simplified by removing transitive edges and trimming short branches. Unitigs were generated based on minimum cost flow analysis of the overlap graph and then merged to contigs and scaffolds using mate-pair information. In comparison with three de Bruijn graph assemblers (SOAPdenovo, IDBA-UD and MetaVelvet), Omega provided comparable overall performance on a HiSeq 100-bp dataset and superior performance on a MiSeq 300-bp dataset. In comparison with Celera on the MiSeq dataset, Omega provided more continuous assemblies overall using a fraction of the computing time of existing overlap-layout-consensus assemblers. This indicates Omega can more efficiently assemble longer Illumina reads, and at deeper coverage, for metagenomic datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implemented in C++ with source code and binaries freely available at http://omega.omicsbio.org.
Bahlul Haider, Tae-Hyuk Ahn, Brian Bushnell, Juanjuan Chai, Alex Copeland, Chongle Pan
Bioinform.3
2013 Automatic Outlier Detection for Genome Assembly Quality Assessment
abstract
In this work we describe a method to automatically detect errors in de novo assembled genomes. The method extends a Bayesian assembly quality evaluation framework, ALE, which computes the likelihood of an assembly given a set of unassembled data. Starting from ALE output, this method applies outlier detection algorithms to identify the precise locations of assembly errors. We show results from a microbial genome with manually curated assembly errors. Our method detects all deletions, 82.3% of insertions, and 88.8% of single base substitutions. It was also able to detect an inversion error that spans more than 400 bases.
Taghrid Samak, Rob Egan, Brian Bushnell, Dan Gunter, Alex Copeland, Zhong Wang 0003
e-Science3