Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhichao Han 0003
dblp:151/6624-3
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0003-6790-4864ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 78% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Adversarial Attack on Community Detection by Hiding Individuals · WWW 2020 Predicting Path Failure In Time-Evolving Graphs · KDD 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Attack on Community Detection by Hiding Individuals · WWW 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
graph adversarial attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Attack on Community Detection by Hiding Individuals · WWW 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Attack on Community Detection by Hiding Individuals · WWW 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
dynamic graph learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Predicting Path Failure In Time-Evolving Graphs · KDD 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › heterogeneous graph neural network
relational graph convolutional network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Predicting Path Failure In Time-Evolving Graphs · KDD 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deeper Insights Into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deeper Insights Into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
semi-supervised node classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deeper Insights Into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Community Detection based on Distance Dynamics · KDD 2015 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Community Detection based on Distance Dynamics · KDD 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate model · 0.9iterative learning · 0.9constrained graph generator · 0.9black-box attack · 0.9dynamical system modeling · 0.4self-attention · 0.4relational GCN · 0.4LSTM · 0.4self-training · 0.3laplacian smoothing · 0.3co-training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Adversarial Attack on Community Detection by Hiding IndividualsabstractIt has been demonstrated that adversarial graphs, i.e., graphs with imperceptible perturbations added, can cause deep graph models to fail on node/graph classification tasks. In this paper, we extend adversarial graphs to the problem of community detection which is much more difficult. We focus on black-box attack and aim to hide targeted individuals from the detection of deep graph community detection models, which has many applications in real-world scenarios, for example, protecting personal privacy in social networks and understanding camouflage patterns in transaction networks. We propose an iterative learning framework that takes turns to update two modules: one working as the constrained graph generator and the other as the surrogate community detection model. We also find that the adversarial graphs generated by our method can be transferred to other learning based community detection models. Jia Li 0009, Zhichao Han 0003, Yu Rong 0001, Hong Cheng 0001, Junzhou Huang |
WWW | 3 |
| 2019 | Predicting Path Failure In Time-Evolving GraphsabstractIn this paper we use a time-evolving graph which consists of a sequence of graph snapshots over time to model many real-world networks. We study the path classification problem in a time-evolving graph, which has many applications in real-world scenarios, for example, predicting path failure in a telecommunication network and predicting path congestion in a traffic network in the near future. In order to capture the temporal dependency and graph structure dynamics, we design a novel deep neural network named Long Short-Term Memory R-GCN (LRGCN). LRGCN considers temporal dependency between time-adjacent graph snapshots as a special relation with memory, and uses relational GCN to jointly process both intra-time and inter-time relations. We also propose a new path representation method named self-attentive path embedding (SAPE), to embed paths of arbitrary length into fixed-length vectors. Through experiments on a real-world telecommunication network and a traffic network in California, we demonstrate the superiority of LRGCN to other competing methods in path failure prediction, and prove the effectiveness of SAPE on path representation. Jia Li 0009, Zhichao Han 0003, Hong Cheng 0001, Jiao Su, Pengyun Wang, Lujia Pan |
KDD | 2 |
| 2018 | Deeper Insights Into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised LearningabstractMany interesting problems in machine learning are being revisited with new deep learning tools. For graph-based semi-supervised learning, a recent important development is graph convolutional networks (GCNs), which nicely integrate local vertex features and graph topology in the convolutional layers. Although the GCN model compares favorably with other state-of-the-art methods, its mechanisms are not clear and it still requires considerable amount of labeled data for validation and model selection. In this paper, we develop deeper insights into the GCN model and address its fundamental limits. First, we show that the graph convolution of the GCN model is actually a special form of Laplacian smoothing, which is the key reason why GCNs work, but it also brings potential concerns of over-smoothing with many convolutional layers. Second, to overcome the limits of the GCN model with shallow architectures, we propose both co-training and self-training approaches to train GCNs. Our approaches significantly improve GCNs in learning with very few labels, and exempt them from requiring additional labels for validation. Extensive experiments on benchmarks have verified our theory and proposals. Qimai Li, Zhichao Han 0003, Xiao-Ming Wu 0003 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2015 | Community Detection based on Distance DynamicsabstractIn this paper, we introduce a new community detection algorithm, called Attractor, which automatically spots communities in a network by examining the changes of "distances" among nodes (i.e. distance dynamics). The fundamental idea is to envision the target network as an adaptive dynamical system, where each node interacts with its neighbors. The interaction will change the distances among nodes, while the distances will affect the interactions. Such interplay eventually leads to a steady distribution of distances, where the nodes sharing the same community move together and the nodes in different communities keep far away from each other. Building upon the distance dynamics, Attractor has several remarkable advantages: (a) It provides an intuitive way to analyze the community structure of a network, and more importantly, faithfully captures the natural communities (with high quality). (b) Attractor allows detecting communities on large-scale networks due to its low time complexity (O(|E|)). (c) Attractor is capable of discovering communities of arbitrary size, and thus small-size communities or anomalies, usually existing in real-world networks, can be well pinpointed. Extensive experiments show that our algorithm allows the effective and efficient community detection and has good performance compared to state-of-the-art algorithms. Junming Shao, Zhichao Han 0003, Qinli Yang, Tao Zhou 0001 |
KDD | 2 |