Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hastagiri P. Vanchinathan

dblp:151/6848 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 88% Approximation and online algorithms · 12%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.212016
Beyond Collaborative Filtering: The List Recommendation Problem · WWW 2016
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering › ranking-based collaborative filtering
listwise collaborative filtering
0.212016
Beyond Collaborative Filtering: The List Recommendation Problem · WWW 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.212015
Discovering Valuable items from Massive Data · KDD 2015
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.212015
Discovering Valuable items from Massive Data · KDD 2015
Mathematical optimization
knapsack problem
0.212015
Discovering Valuable items from Massive Data · KDD 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
partial monitoring
0.212014
Efficient Partial Monitoring with Prior Information · NIPS 2014
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation › off-policy evaluation
inverse propensity scoring
0.112016
Beyond Collaborative Filtering: The List Recommendation Problem · WWW 2016
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation
off-policy evaluation
0.112016
Beyond Collaborative Filtering: The List Recommendation Problem · WWW 2016
Recommender systems
recommendation
0.112015
Discovering Valuable items from Massive Data · KDD 2015
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.112014
Efficient Partial Monitoring with Prior Information · NIPS 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

submodular optimization · 0.7gaussian process · 0.7prior information · 0.4inverse propensity scoring · 0.2collaborative filtering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Beyond Collaborative Filtering: The List Recommendation Problem
abstract
Most Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms are optimized using a dataset of isolated user-item tuples. However, in commercial applications recommended items are usually served as an ordered list of several items and not as isolated items. In this setting, inter-item interactions have an effect on the list's Click-Through Rate (CTR) that is unaccounted for using traditional CF approaches. Most CF approaches also ignore additional important factors like click propensity variation, item fatigue, etc. In this work, we introduce the list recommendation problem. We present useful insights gleaned from user behavior and consumption patterns from a large scale real world recommender system. We then propose a novel two-layered framework that builds upon existing CF algorithms to optimize a list's click probability. Our approach accounts for inter-item interactions as well as additional information such as item fatigue, trendiness patterns, contextual information etc. Finally, we evaluate our approach using a novel adaptation of Inverse Propensity Scoring (IPS) which facilitates off-policy estimation of our method's CTR and showcases its effectiveness in real-world settings.
Oren Sar Shalom, Noam Koenigstein, Ulrich Paquet, Hastagiri P. Vanchinathan
WWW4
2015 Discovering Valuable items from Massive Data
abstract
Suppose there is a large collection of items, each with an associated cost and an inherent utility that is revealed only once we commit to selecting it. Given a budget on the cumulative cost of the selected items, how can we pick a subset of maximal value? This task generalizes several important problems such as multi-arm bandits, active search and the knapsack problem. We present an algorithm, GP-SELECT, which utilizes prior knowledge about similarity between items, expressed as a kernel function. GP-SELECT uses Gaussian process prediction to balance exploration (estimating the unknown value of items) and exploitation (selecting items of high value). We extend GP-SELECT to be able to discover sets that simultaneously have high utility and are diverse. Our preference for diversity can be specified as an arbitrary monotone submodular function that quantifies the diminishing returns obtained when selecting similar items. Furthermore, we exploit the structure of the model updates to achieve an order of magnitude (up to 40X) speedup in our experiments without resorting to approximations. We provide strong guarantees on the performance of GP-SELECT and apply it to three real-world case studies of industrial relevance: (1) Refreshing a repository of prices in a Global Distribution System for the travel industry, (2) Identifying diverse, binding-affine peptides in a vaccine design task and (3) Maximizing clicks in a web-scale recommender system by recommending items to users.
Hastagiri P. Vanchinathan, Andreas Marfurt, Charles-Antoine Robelin, Donald Kossmann, Andreas Krause 0001
KDD1
2014 Efficient Partial Monitoring with Prior Information
Hastagiri P. Vanchinathan, Gábor Bartók, Andreas Krause 0001
NIPS1
2014 Explore-exploit in top-N recommender systems via Gaussian processes
abstract
We address the challenge of ranking recommendation lists based on click feedback by efficiently encoding similarities among users and among items. The key challenges are threefold: (1) combinatorial number of lists; (2) sparse feedback and (3) context dependent recommendations. We propose the CGPRank algorithm, which exploits prior information specified in terms of a Gaussian process kernel function, which allows to share feedback in three ways: Between positions in a list, between items, and between contexts. Under our model, we provide strong performance guarantees and empirically evaluate our algorithm on data from two large scale recommendation tasks: Yahoo! news article recommendation, and Google books. In our experiments, CGPRank significantly outperforms state-of-the-art multi-armed bandit and learning-to-rank methods, with an 18% increase in clicks.
Hastagiri P. Vanchinathan, Isidor Nikolic, Fabio De Bona, Andreas Krause 0001
RecSys1