Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mayu Sakurada
dblp:151/8903
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Deep Fisher Kernels - End to End Learning of the Fisher Kernel GMM Parameters · CVPR 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel function
fisher kernel |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Deep Fisher Kernels - End to End Learning of the Fisher Kernel GMM Parameters · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Deep Fisher Kernels - End to End Learning of the Fisher Kernel GMM Parameters · CVPR 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.2gradient descent · 0.2gaussian mixture model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Deep Fisher Kernels - End to End Learning of the Fisher Kernel GMM ParametersabstractFisher Kernels and Deep Learning were two developments with significant impact on large-scale object categorization in the last years. Both approaches were shown to achieve state-of-the-art results on large-scale object categorization datasets, such as ImageNet. Conceptually, however, they are perceived as very different and it is not uncommon for heated debates to spring up when advocates of both paradigms meet at conferences or workshops. In this work, we emphasize the similarities between both architectures rather than their differences and we argue that such a unified view allows us to transfer ideas from one domain to the other. As a concrete example we introduce a method for learning a support vector machine classifier with Fisher kernel at the same time as a task-specific data representation. We reinterpret the setting as a multi-layer feed forward network. Its final layer is the classifier, parameterized by a weight vector, and the two previous layers compute Fisher vectors, parameterized by the coefficients of a Gaussian mixture model. We introduce a gradient descent based learning algorithm that, in contrast to other feature learning techniques, is not just derived from intuition or biological analogy, but has a theoretical justification in the framework of statistical learning theory. Our experiments show that the new training procedure leads to significant improvements in classification accuracy while preserving the modularity and geometric interpretability of a support vector machine setup. Vladyslav Sydorov, Mayu Sakurada, Christoph H. Lampert |
CVPR | 2 |