Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qunlin Chen

dblp:152/0554 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Language models and text generation · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › capability evaluation
creativity evaluation
1.012026
CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to Product · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to Product · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal instruction tuning
1.012026
CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to Product · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
1.012026
CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to Product · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

instruction tuning · 1.0human feedback · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CreBench: Human-Aligned Creativity Evaluation from Idea to Process to Product
abstract
Human-defined creativity is highly abstract, posing a challenge for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to comprehend and assess creativity that aligns with human judgments. The absence of an existing benchmark further exacerbates this dilemma. To this end, we propose CreBench, which consists of two key components: 1) an evaluation benchmark covering the multiple dimensions from creative idea to process to products; 2) CreMIT (Creativity Multimodal Instruction Tuning dataset), a multimodal creativity evaluation dataset, consisting of 2.2K diverse-sourced multimodal data, 79.2K human feedbacks and 4.7M multityped instructions. Specifically, to ensure MLLMs can handle diverse creativity-related queries, we prompt GPT to refine the human feedback to activate stronger creativity assessment capabilities. CreBench serves as a foundation for building MLLMs that understand human-aligned creativity. Based on the CreBench, we fine-tune open-source general MLLMs, resulting in CreExpert, a multimodal creativity evaluation expert model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed CreExpert models achieve significantly better alignment with human creativity evaluation compared to state-ofthe-art MLLMs, including the most advanced GPT-4V and Gemini-Pro-Vision.
Kaiwen Xue 0001, Zhonghong Ou, Kaoyan Lu, Shuai Lyu, Yifan Zhu 0001, Ping Zong, Junpeng Ding, Qunlin Chen, Weiwei Qin, Yiran Shen 0007, Jiayi Cen
AAAI11
2023 A Neural Predictive Model of Negative Emotions for COVID-19
abstract
The long-lasting global pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has changed our daily life in many ways and put heavy burden on our mental health. Having a predictive model of negative emotions during COVID-19 is of great importance for identifying potential risky population. To establish a neural predictive model achieving both good interpretability and predictivity, we have utilized a large-scale (n = 542) longitudinal dataset, alongside two independent samples for external validation. We built a predictive model based on psychologically meaningful resting state neural activities. The whole-brain resting-state neural activity and social-psychological profile of the subjects were obtained from Sept. to Dec. 2019 (Time 1). Their negative emotions were tracked and re-assessed twice, on Feb 22 (Time 2) and Apr 24 (Time 3), 2020, respectively. We first applied canonical correlation analysis on both the neural profiles and psychological profiles collected on Time 1, this step selects only the psychological meaningful neural patterns for later model construction. We then trained the neural predictive model using those identified features on data obtained on Time 2. It achieved a good prediction performance (r = 0.44, p = 8.13 × 10-27). The two most important neural predictors are associated with self-control and social interaction. This study established an effective neural prediction model of negative emotions, achieving good interpretability and predictivity. It will be useful for identifying potential risky population of emotional disorders related to COVID-19.
Yu Mao 0002, Dongtao Wei, Qunlin Chen, Jiangzhou Sun, Yaxu Yu, Kaixiang Zhuang, Tingyong Feng, Qinghua He, Shaozheng Qin, Yunzhe Liu 0004, Jiang Qiu
IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput.4