Parag G. Patil

dblp:152/0960 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 53% Medical and health informatics · 47%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 41% Deep learning architectures and training · 36% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface
2.332025
Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning · NeurIPS 2025
Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024
Balancing memorization and generalization in RNNs for high performance brain-machine Interfaces · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding
1.732025
Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024
Balancing memorization and generalization in RNNs for high performance brain-machine Interfaces · NeurIPS 2023
Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › continual domain adaptation
continuous domain adaptation
0.912025
Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.912025
Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.912025
Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM
0.712023
Balancing memorization and generalization in RNNs for high performance brain-machine Interfaces · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.712023
Balancing memorization and generalization in RNNs for high performance brain-machine Interfaces · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › manipulator control
robot arm control
0.212024
Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.212023
Balancing memorization and generalization in RNNs for high performance brain-machine Interfaces · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recurrent neural network · 2.8LSTM · 2.8neural network · 1.7linear model · 1.7kalmannet · 1.5kalman filter · 1.5heteroscedastic kalman filter · 1.5convolutional neural network · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics (LINK): An intracortical neural dataset for chronic brain-machine interfaces, neuroscience, and machine learning
abstract
Intracortical brain-machine interfaces (iBMIs) have enabled movement and speech in people living with paralysis by using neural data to decode behaviors in real-time. However, intracortical neural recordings exhibit significant instabilities over time, which poses problems for iBMIs, neuroscience, and machine learning. For iBMIs, neural instabilities require frequent decoder recalibration to maintain high performance, a critical bottleneck for real-world translation. Several approaches have been developed to address this issue, and the field has recognized the need for standardized datasets on which to compare them, but no standard dataset exists for evaluation over year-long timescales. In neuroscience, a growing body of research attempts to elucidate the latent computations performed by populations of neurons. Nonstationarity in neural recordings imposes significant challenges to the design of these studies, so a dataset containing recordings over large time spans would improve methods to account for instabilities. In machine learning, continuous domain adaptation of temporal data is an area of active research, and a dataset containing shift distributions on long time scales would be beneficial to researchers. To address these gaps, we present the LINK Dataset (Long-term Intracortical Neural activity and Kinematics), which contains intracortical spiking activity and kinematic data from 312 sessions of a non-human primate performing a dexterous, 2 degree-of-freedom finger movement task, spanning 1,242 days. We also present longitudinal analyses of the dataset’s neural spiking activity and its relationship to kinematics, as well as overall decoding performance using linear and neural network models. The LINK dataset (https://dandiarchive.org/dandiset/001201) and code (https://github.com/chesteklab/LINK_dataset) are freely available to the public.
Hisham Temmar, Nina Gill, Nicholas Mellon, Luis Cubillos, Rio Parsons, Joseph T. Costello, Matteo Ceradini, Madison Kelberman, Matthew Mender, Aren Hite, Dylan Wallace, Samuel Nason, Parag G. Patil, Matt S. Willsey, Anne Draelos, Cynthia A. Chestek
NeurIPS15
2024 Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces
abstract
People with brain or spinal cord-related paralysis often need to rely on others for basic tasks, limiting their independence. A potential solution is brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which could allow them to voluntarily control external devices (e.g., robotic arm) by decoding brain activity to movement commands. In the past decade, deep-learning decoders have achieved state-of-the-art results in most BMI applications, ranging from speech production to finger control. However, the 'black-box' nature of deep-learning decoders could lead to unexpected behaviors, resulting in major safety concerns in real-world physical control scenarios. In these applications, explainable but lower-performing decoders, such as the Kalman filter (KF), remain the norm. In this study, we designed a BMI decoder based on KalmanNet, an extension of the KF that augments its operation with recurrent neural networks to compute the Kalman gain. This results in a varying “trust” that shifts between inputs and dynamics. We used this algorithm to predict finger movements from the brain activity of two monkeys. We compared KalmanNet results offline (pre-recorded data, $n=13$ days) and online (real-time predictions, $n=5$ days) with a simple KF and two recent deep-learning algorithms: tcFNN (non-ReFIT version) and LSTM. KalmanNet achieved comparable or better results than other deep learning models in offline and online modes, relying on the dynamical model for stopping while depending more on neural inputs for initiating movements. We further validated this mechanism by implementing a heteroscedastic KF that used the same strategy, and it also approached state-of-the-art performance while remaining in the explainable domain of standard KFs. However, we also see two downsides to KalmanNet. KalmanNet shares the limited generalization ability of existing deep-learning decoders, and its usage of the KF as an inductive bias limits its performance in the presence of unseen noise distributions. Despite this trade-off, our analysis successfully integrates traditional controls and modern deep-learning approaches to motivate high-performing yet still explainable BMI designs.
Luis Cubillos, Guy Revach, Matthew Mender, Joseph T. Costello, Hisham Temmar, Aren Hite, Diksha Anoop Kumar Zutshi, Dylan Wallace, Xiaoyong Ni, Madison Kelberman, Matt S. Willsey, Ruud van Sloun, Nir Shlezinger, Parag G. Patil, Anne Draelos, Cynthia A. Chestek
NeurIPS14
2023 Balancing memorization and generalization in RNNs for high performance brain-machine Interfaces
abstract
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) can restore motor function to people with paralysis but are currently limited by the accuracy of real-time decoding algorithms. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) using modern training techniques have shown promise in accurately predicting movements from neural signals but have yet to be rigorously evaluated against other decoding algorithms in a closed-loop setting. Here we compared RNNs to other neural network architectures in real-time, continuous decoding of finger movements using intracortical signals from nonhuman primates. Across one and two finger online tasks, LSTMs (a type of RNN) outperformed convolutional and transformer-based neural networks, averaging 18% higher throughput than the convolution network. On simplified tasks with a reduced movement set, RNN decoders were allowed to memorize movement patterns and matched able-bodied control. Performance gradually dropped as the number of distinct movements increased but did not go below fully continuous decoder performance. Finally, in a two-finger task where one degree-of-freedom had poor input signals, we recovered functional control using RNNs trained to act both like a movement classifier and continuous decoder. Our results suggest that RNNs can enable functional real-time BMI control by learning and generating accurate movement patterns.
Joseph T. Costello, Hisham Temmar, Luis Cubillos, Matthew Mender, Dylan Wallace, Matt S. Willsey, Parag G. Patil, Cynthia A. Chestek
NeurIPS7