Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) technology can assist clinicians in evaluating liver lesions and intervening with treatment in time. Although CAD technology has advanced in recent years, the application scope of existing datasets remains relatively limited, typically supporting only single tasks, which has somewhat constrained the development of CAD technology. To address the above limitation, in this paper, we construct a multi-task liver dataset (LiMT) used for liver and tumor segmentation, multi-label lesion classification, and lesion detection based on arterial phase-enhanced computed tomography (CT), potentially providing an exploratory solution that is able to explore the correlation between tasks and does not need to worry about the heterogeneity between task-specific datasets during training. The dataset includes CT volumes from 150 different cases, comprising four types of liver diseases as well as normal cases. Each volume has been carefully annotated and calibrated by experienced clinicians. This public multi-task dataset may become a valuable resource for the medical imaging research community in the future. In addition, this paper not only provides relevant baseline experimental results but also reviews existing datasets and methods related to liver-related tasks.

The significant of Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is self-evident in contemporary Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) which aims to recommend suitable questions for students based on their knowledge state. In recent years, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods have been increasingly applied to CAT. While these approaches have achieved empirical success, they still face limitations, such as inadequate handling of concept relevance when multiple concepts are involved and incomplete evaluation metrics. To address these issues, we propose a Knowledge Graph Reasoning-Based Model for CAT (KGCAT), which leverages the reasoning power of knowledge graphs (KGs) to capture the semantic and relational information between concepts and questions while focusing on reducing the noise caused by concepts with low relevance by utilizing mutual information. Additionally, a multi-objective reinforcement learning framework is employed to incorporate multiple evaluation objectives, further refining question selection and improving the overall effectiveness of CAT. Empirical evaluations conducted on three authentic educational datasets demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms existing methods in both accuracy and interpretability.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been used in congestion control algorithms (CCAs) for its ability to adapt to different network environments. However, its effectiveness is often hindered by the limited availability of training data and constrained training scales. While it has been proved that combining rule-based (expert) CCAs as a guide for DRL (namely hybrid CCAs) can address this limitation, we show through experimental measurements that rule-based CCAs potentially restrict action exploration of DRL models and may cause the DRL models to overly rely on them for higher reward gains. To address this gap, this paper proposes Marten, a framework that improves the effectiveness of rule-based CCAs for DRL. Marten’s key innovations include an entropy-based dynamic exploration scheme that expands the exploration of DRL, and a reward adjustment scheme to prevent the DRL models’ over-reliance on experts in hybrid CCAs. We have implemented Marten in both simulation platform OpenAI Gym and deployment platform QUIC. Experimental results in both emulated and production networks demonstrate Marten can improve throughput by 0.31% and reduce latency by 12.69% on average compared to the state-of-the-art hybrid CCAs. Compared to BBR, Marten achieves a 2.79% increase in throughput and an 11.73% reduction in latency on average.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been proved to be an effective method to improve the congestion control algorithms (CCAs). However, the lack of training data and training scale affect the effectiveness of DRL model. Combining rule-based CCAs (such as BBR) as a guide for DRL is an effective way to improve learning-based CCAs. By experiment measurement, we find that the rule-based CCAs limit the action exploration and even cause DRL’s excessive dependence to gain higher DRL’s reward gain. To overcome the constraints, we propose Marten, a framework which improves the effectiveness of rule-based CCAs for DRL. Marten uses entropy as the degree of exploration and uses it to expand the exploration of DRL. Furthermore, Marten introduces the shielding mechanism to avoid wrong DRL actions. We have implemented Marten in both simulation platform OpenAI Gym and deployment platform QUIC. The experimental results in production network demonstrate Marten can improve throughput by 0.36% and reduce latency by 14.89% on average compared with Eagle, and improve throughput by 2.79% and reduce latency by 11.73% on average compared with BBR.

Most congestion control algorithms (CCAs) are designed for specific network environments. As such, there is no known algorithm that achieves uniformly good performance in all scenarios for all flows. Rather than devising a one-size-fits-all algorithm (which is a likely impossible task), we propose a system to dynamically switch between the most suitable CCAs for specific flows in specific environments. This raises a number of challenges, which we address through the design and implementation of Antelope, a system that can dynamically reconfigure the stack to use the most suitable CCA for individual flows. We build a machine learning model to learn which algorithm works best for individual conditions and implement kernel-level support for dynamically switching between CCAs. The framework also takes application requirements of performance into consideration to fine-tune the selection based on application-layer needs. Moreover, to reduce the overhead introduced by machine learning on individual front-end servers, we (optionally) implement the CCA selection process in the cloud, which allows the share of models and the selection among front-end servers. We have implemented Antelope in Linux, and evaluated it in both emulated and production networks. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of Antelope via dynamic adjusting the CCAs for individual flows. Specifically, Antelope achieves an average 16% improvement in throughput compared with BBR, and an average 19% improvement in throughput and 10% reduction in delay compared with CUBIC.

Most congestion control mechanisms are designed for specific network environments. Hence, there is no known algorithm that achieves uniformly good performance in all scenarios for all flows. Rather than devising such a one-size-fits-all algorithm, we propose a system to dynamically switch between the most suitable congestion control mechanisms for specific flows in specific environments. This raises a number of challenges, which we address through the design and implementation of Antelope, a system that can dynamically reconfigure to use the most suitable congestion control mechanism for an individual flow. We build a machine learning approach to learn which algorithm works best for individual conditions and implement kernel-level support for dynamically adjusting congestion control algorithms. We have implemented Antelope in Linux, and evaluated it in both emulated and production networks. We show that in WAN, DCN, and cellular networks, Antelope achieves an average 16% improvement in throughput compared with BBR; compared with Cubic, Antelope achieves an average 19% improvement in throughput and 10% reduction in delay.