Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vinay Praneeth Boda
dblp:153/1758
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-0586-8031ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Coding theory · 88% Approximation and online algorithms · 6% Algorithms and data structures · 6% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › source coding
rate-distortion theory |
1.0 | 3 | 2019 | Reconstructing Gaussian Sources by Spatial Sampling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 Universal Sampling Rate Distortion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 Sampling Rate Distortion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Correlated bandits or: How to minimize mean-squared error online · ICML 2019 |
Coding theory › source coding
gaussian source |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reconstructing Gaussian Sources by Spatial Sampling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Coding theory › source coding
universal coding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reconstructing Gaussian Sources by Spatial Sampling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
best arm identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Correlated bandits or: How to minimize mean-squared error online · ICML 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Correlated bandits or: How to minimize mean-squared error online · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
successive rejects · 0.8minimax theory · 0.8single-letter characterization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Correlated bandits or: How to minimize mean-squared error onlineabstractWhile the objective in traditional multi-armed bandit problems is to find the arm with the highest mean, in many settings, finding an arm that best captures information about other arms is of interest. This objective, however, requires learning the underlying correlation structure and not just the means. Sensors placement for industrial surveillance and cellular network monitoring are a few applications, where the underlying correlation structure plays an important role. Motivated by such applications, we formulate the correlated bandit problem, where the objective is to find the arm with the lowest mean-squared error (MSE) in estimating all the arms. To this end, we derive first an MSE estimator based on sample variances/covariances and show that our estimator exponentially concentrates around the true MSE. Under a best-arm identification framework, we propose a successive rejects type algorithm and provide bounds on the probability of error in identifying the best arm. Using minimax theory, we also derive fundamental performance limits for the correlated bandit problem. Vinay Praneeth Boda, Prashanth L. A. |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Reconstructing Gaussian Sources by Spatial SamplingabstractConsider a Gaussian memoryless multiple source (GMMS) with m components with joint probability distribution known only to lie in a given class of distributions. A subset of k ≤ m components is sampled and compressed with the objective of reconstructing all the m components within a specified level of distortion under a mean-squared error criterion. In Bayesian and nonBayesian settings, the notion of universal sampling rate-distortion function for Gaussian sources is introduced to capture the optimal tradeoffs among sampling, compression rate, and distortion level. Single-letter characterizations are provided for the universal sampling rate-distortion function. Our achievability proofs highlight the following structural property: it is optimal to compress and reconstruct first the sampled components of the GMMS alone, and then form estimates for the unsampled components based on the former. Vinay Praneeth Boda |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2018 | Universal Sampling Rate Distortion
Vinay Praneeth Boda, Prakash Narayan |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2017 | Universal sampling rate distortionabstractWe examine the coordinated and universal rate-efficient sampling of a subset of correlated discrete memoryless sources followed by lossy compression of the sampled sources. The goal is to reconstruct a predesignated subset of sources within a specified level of distortion. The combined sampling mechanism and rate distortion code are universal in that they are devised to perform robustly without exact knowledge of the underlying probability distribution of the sources. Single-letter characterizations are provided for a universal sampling rate distortion function for fixed-set and independent random sampling. Vinay Praneeth Boda, Prakash Narayan |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2017 | Sampling Rate Distortion
Vinay Praneeth Boda, Prakash Narayan |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2016 | Independent and memoryless sampling rate distortionabstractConsider a discrete memoryless multiple source with m component sources. A subset of k ≤ m sources are sampled at each time instant and jointly compressed in order to reconstruct all the m sources under a given distortion criterion. A sampling rate distortion function is studied for two main sampling schemes. First, for independent random sampling performed without knowledge of the source outputs, it is shown that the sampling rate distortion function is the same regardless of whether the decoder is informed or not of the sequence of sampling sets. Next, memoryless random sampling is considered with the sampler depending on the source outputs and with an informed decoder. It is shown that deterministic sampling, characterized by a conditional point-mass, is optimal and suffices to achieve the sampling rate distortion function. For memoryless random sampling with an uninformed decoder, an upper bound for the sampling rate distortion function is seen to possess a similar property of conditional point-mass optimality. It is shown by example that memoryless sampling with an informed decoder can outperform strictly any independent random sampler, and that memoryless sampling can do strictly better with an informed decoder than without. Vinay Praneeth Boda, Prakash Narayan |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2014 | Sampling rate distortionabstractConsider a discrete memoryless multiple source with m components of which k ≤ m possibly different sources are sampled at each time instant and jointly compressed in order to reconstruct all the m sources under a given distortion criterion. A new notion of sampling rate distortion function is introduced, and is characterized first for the case of fixed-set sampling. Next, for independent random sampling performed without knowledge of the source outputs, it is shown that the sampling rate distortion function is the same regardless of whether or not the decoder is informed of the sequence of sampled sets. Furthermore, memoryless random sampling is considered with the sampler depending on the source outputs and with an informed decoder. It is shown that deterministic sampling, characterized by a conditional point-mass, is optimal and suffices to achieve the sampling rate distortion function. For memoryless random sampling with an uninformed decoder, an upper bound for the sampling rate distortion function is seen to possess a similar property of conditional point-mass optimality. It is shown by example that memoryless sampling with an informed decoder can outperform strictly any independent random sampler, and that memoryless sampling can do strictly better with an informed decoder than without. Vinay Praneeth Boda, Prakash Narayan |
ISIT | 1 |