Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aaron Okano

dblp:153/5241 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
developer behavior
0.212014
Focus-shifting patterns of OSS developers and their congruence with call graphs · SIGSOFT FSE 2014
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.212014
Focus-shifting patterns of OSS developers and their congruence with call graphs · SIGSOFT FSE 2014
Software maintenance and evolution › software dependencies › software dependency management
software dependency analysis
0.112014
Focus-shifting patterns of OSS developers and their congruence with call graphs · SIGSOFT FSE 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network analysis · 0.2information-theoretic measures · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Focus-shifting patterns of OSS developers and their congruence with call graphs
abstract
Developers in complex, self-organized open-source projects often work on many different files, and over time switch focus between them. Shifting focus can have impact on the software quality and productivity, and is thus an important topic of investigation. In this paper, we study focus shifting patterns (FSPs) of developers by comparing trace data from a dozen open source software (OSS) projects of their longitudinal commit activities and file dependencies from the projects call graphs. Using information theoretic measures of network structure, we find that fairly complex focus-shifting patterns emerge, and FSPs in the same project are more similar to each other. We show that developers tend to shift focus along with, rather than away from, software dependency links described by the call graphs. This tendency becomes weaker as either the interval between successive commits, or the organizational distance between committed files (i.e. directory distance), gets larger. Interestingly, this tendency appears stronger with more productive developers. We hope our study will initiate interest in further understanding of FSPs, which can ultimately help to (1) improve current recommender systems to predict the next focus of developers, and (2) provide insight into better call graph design, so as to facilitate developers' work.
Qi Xuan 0001, Aaron Okano, Premkumar T. Devanbu, Vladimir Filkov
SIGSOFT FSE2