VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher Tosh
dblp:153/5451 · also Christopher J. Tosh
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
10as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 10 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 57% Mathematical optimization · 43% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Interactive Structure Learning with Structural Query-by-Committee · NeurIPS 2018 Diameter-Based Active Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
agnostic learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple and near-optimal algorithms for hidden stratification and multi-group learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple and near-optimal algorithms for hidden stratification and multi-group learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › group robustness
multi-group learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple and near-optimal algorithms for hidden stratification and multi-group learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian decision theory |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Contrastive Estimation Reveals Topic Posterior Information to Linear Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
prior misspecification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Mixing Rates for the Alternating Gibbs Sampler over Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Friends · ICML 2016 Lower Bounds for the Gibbs Sampler over Mixtures of Gaussians · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Mixing Rates for the Alternating Gibbs Sampler over Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Friends · ICML 2016 Lower Bounds for the Gibbs Sampler over Mixtures of Gaussians · ICML 2014 |
Computational complexity
average-case complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Relative Complexity of Maximum Likelihood Estimation, MAP Estimation, and Sampling · COLT 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.3 | 2 | 2017 | Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Mixtures of Spherical Gaussians is NP-hard · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Lower Bounds for the Gibbs Sampler over Mixtures of Gaussians · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning › disagreement-based active learning
query by committee |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Interactive Structure Learning with Structural Query-by-Committee · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Mixtures of Spherical Gaussians is NP-hard · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › markov chain
mixing rate |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Mixing Rates for the Alternating Gibbs Sampler over Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Friends · ICML 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Contrastive Estimation Reveals Topic Posterior Information to Linear Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | The Relative Complexity of Maximum Likelihood Estimation, MAP Estimation, and Sampling · COLT 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | The Relative Complexity of Maximum Likelihood Estimation, MAP Estimation, and Sampling · COLT 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Mixing Rates for the Alternating Gibbs Sampler over Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Friends · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › boltzmann machine
restricted boltzmann machine |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Mixing Rates for the Alternating Gibbs Sampler over Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Friends · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
gaussian mixture model |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Lower Bounds for the Gibbs Sampler over Mixtures of Gaussians · ICML 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reduction · 0.8subgroup fairness · 0.6hidden stratification · 0.6topic modeling · 0.5sensitivity analysis · 0.5linear classifier · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5PAC bounds · 0.5convergence rate analysis · 0.3consistency analysis · 0.3maximum likelihood estimation · 0.3complexity reduction · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Simple and near-optimal algorithms for hidden stratification and multi-group learningabstractMulti-group agnostic learning is a formal learning criterion that is concerned with the conditional risks of predictors within subgroups of a population. The criterion addresses recent practical concerns such as subgroup fairness and hidden stratification. This paper studies the structure of solutions to the multi-group learning problem, and provides simple and near-optimal algorithms for the learning problem. Christopher Tosh, Daniel Hsu 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelsabstractSelf-supervised learning is an empirically successful approach to unsupervised learning based on creating artificial supervised learning problems. A popular self-supervised approach to representation learning is contrastive learning, which leverages naturally occurring pairs of similar and dissimilar data points, or multiple views of the same data. This work provides a theoretical analysis of contrastive learning in the multi-view setting, where two views of each datum are available. The main result is that linear functions of the learned representations are nearly optimal on downstream prediction tasks whenever the two views provide redundant information about the label. Christopher Tosh, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Daniel Hsu 0001 |
ALT | 1 |
| 2021 | Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to meta-learningabstractThompson sampling and other Bayesian sequential decision-making algorithms are among the most popular approaches to tackle explore/exploit trade-offs in (contextual) bandits. The choice of prior in these algorithms offers flexibility to encode domain knowledge but can also lead to poor performance when misspecified. In this paper, we demonstrate that performance degrades gracefully with misspecification. We prove that the expected reward accrued by Thompson sampling (TS) with a misspecified prior differs by at most $\tilde{O}(H^2 \epsilon)$ from TS with a well-specified prior, where $\epsilon$ is the total-variation distance between priors and $H$ is the learning horizon. Our bound does not require the prior to have any parametric form. For priors with bounded support, our bound is independent of the cardinality or structure of the action space, and we show that it is tight up to universal constants in the worst case.Building on our sensitivity analysis, we establish generic PAC guarantees for algorithms in the recently studied Bayesian meta-learning setting and derive corollaries for various families of priors. Our results generalize along two axes: (1) they apply to a broader family of Bayesian decision-making algorithms, including a Monte-Carlo implementation of the knowledge gradient algorithm (KG), and (2) they apply to Bayesian POMDPs, the most general Bayesian decision-making setting, encompassing contextual bandits as a special case. Through numerical simulations, we illustrate how prior misspecification and the deployment of one-step look-ahead (as in KG) can impact the convergence of meta-learning in multi-armed and contextual bandits with structured and correlated priors. Max Simchowitz, Christopher Tosh, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Daniel Hsu 0001, Thodoris Lykouris, Miroslav Dudík, Robert E. Schapire |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Contrastive Estimation Reveals Topic Posterior Information to Linear ModelsabstractContrastive learning is an approach to representation learning that utilizes naturally occurring similar and dissimilar pairs of data points to find useful embeddings of data. In the context of document classification under topic modeling assumptions, we prove that contrastive learning is capable of recovering a representation of documents that reveals their underlying topic posterior information to linear models. We apply this procedure in a semi-supervised setup and demonstrate empirically that linear classifiers trained on these representations perform well in document classification tasks with very few training examples. Christopher Tosh, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Daniel Hsu 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Diameter-based Interactive Structure DiscoveryabstractWe introduce interactive structure discovery, a generic framework that encompasses many interactive learning settings, including active learning, top-k item identification, interactive drug discovery, and others. We adapt a recently developed active learning algorithm of Tosh and Dasgupta for interactive structure discovery, and show that the new algorithm can be made noise-tolerant and enjoys favorable query complexity bounds. Christopher Tosh, Daniel Hsu 0001 |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | The Relative Complexity of Maximum Likelihood Estimation, MAP Estimation, and SamplingabstractWe prove that, for a broad range of problems, maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation and approximate sampling of the posterior are at least as computationally difficult as maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation. By way of illustration, we show how hardness results for ML estimation of mixtures of Gaussians and topic models carry over to MAP estimation and approximate sampling under commonly used priors. Christopher Tosh, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
COLT | 1 |
| 2018 | Interactive Structure Learning with Structural Query-by-CommitteeabstractIn this work, we introduce interactive structure learning, a framework that unifies many different interactive learning tasks. We present a generalization of the query-by-committee active learning algorithm for this setting, and we study its consistency and rate of convergence, both theoretically and empirically, with and without noise. Christopher Tosh, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Diameter-Based Active LearningabstractTo date, the tightest upper and lower-bounds for the active learning of general concept classes have been in terms of a parameter of the learning problem called the splitting index. We provide, for the first time, an efficient algorithm that is able to realize this upper bound, and we empirically demonstrate its good performance. Christopher Tosh, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Mixtures of Spherical Gaussians is NP-hard
Christopher Tosh, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | Mixing Rates for the Alternating Gibbs Sampler over Restricted Boltzmann Machines and FriendsabstractAlternating Gibbs sampling is a modification of classical Gibbs sampling where several variables are simultaneously sampled from their joint conditional distribution. In this work, we investigate the mixing rate of alternating Gibbs sampling with a particular emphasis on Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) and variants. Christopher Tosh |
ICML | 1 |
| 2014 | Lower Bounds for the Gibbs Sampler over Mixtures of GaussiansabstractThe mixing time of a Markov chain is the minimum time t necessary for the total variation distance between the distribution of the Markov chain’s current state X_t and its stationary distribution to fall below some ε> 0. In this paper, we present lower bounds for the mixing time of the Gibbs sampler over Gaussian mixture models with Dirichlet priors. Christopher Tosh, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
ICML | 1 |