Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean Wu

dblp:153/9509 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 75% Efficient and distributed learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.212014
Combining Distant and Partial Supervision for Relation Extraction · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision
0.212014
Combining Distant and Partial Supervision for Relation Extraction · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.212014
Combining Distant and Partial Supervision for Relation Extraction · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.212013
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
sentiment composition
0.212013
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank · EMNLP 2013
Machine learning and data management
weak supervision
0.112014
Combining Distant and Partial Supervision for Relation Extraction · EMNLP 2014
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › compositional representation
compositional representation learning
0.012013
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial supervision · 0.4distant supervision · 0.4active learning · 0.4recursive neural network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 VTR 8: High-performance CAD and Customizable FPGA Architecture Modelling
abstract
Developing Field-programmable Gate Array (FPGA) architectures is challenging due to the competing requirements of various application domains and changing manufacturing process technology. This is compounded by the difficulty of fairly evaluating FPGA architectural choices, which requires sophisticated high-quality Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools to target each potential architecture. This article describes version 8.0 of the open source Verilog to Routing (VTR) project, which provides such a design flow. VTR 8 expands the scope of FPGA architectures that can be modelled, allowing VTR to target and model many details of both commercial and proposed FPGA architectures. The VTR design flow also serves as a baseline for evaluating new CAD algorithms. It is therefore important, for both CAD algorithm comparisons and the validity of architectural conclusions, that VTR produce high-quality circuit implementations. VTR 8 significantly improves optimization quality (reductions of 15% minimum routable channel width, 41% wirelength, and 12% critical path delay), run-time (5.3× faster) and memory footprint (3.3× lower). Finally, we demonstrate VTR is run-time and memory footprint efficient, while producing circuit implementations of reasonable quality compared to highly-tuned architecture-specific industrial tools—showing that architecture generality, good implementation quality, and run-time efficiency are not mutually exclusive goals.
Kevin E. Murray, Oleg Petelin, Jia Min Wang, Mohamed Eldafrawy, Jean-Philippe Legault, Eugene Sha, Aaron Graham, Jean Wu, Matthew J. P. Walker, Hanqing Zeng, Panagiotis Patros, Jason Luu, Kenneth B. Kent, Vaughn Betz
ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst.9
2014 Combining Distant and Partial Supervision for Relation Extraction
abstract
Broad-coverage relation extraction either requires expensive supervised training data, or suffers from drawbacks inherent to distant supervision.We present an approach for providing partial supervision to a distantly supervised relation extractor using a small number of carefully selected examples.We compare against established active learning criteria and propose a novel criterion to sample examples which are both uncertain and representative.In this way, we combine the benefits of fine-grained supervision for difficult examples with the coverage of a large distantly supervised corpus.Our approach gives a substantial increase of 3.9% endto-end F 1 on the 2013 KBP Slot Filling evaluation, yielding a net F 1 of 37.7%.
Gabor Angeli, Julie Tibshirani, Jean Wu, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP3
2013 Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
abstract
Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Ng, Christopher Potts. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2013.
Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Y. Ng, Christopher Potts
EMNLP3