Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

T. J. Pack

dblp:154/0232 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 89% Robot manipulation · 11%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot calibration
0.021988
Calibration procedure for an industrial robot · ICRA 1988
Determination and specification of robot repeatability · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot metrology
0.011986
Determination and specification of robot repeatability · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Robot manipulation
manipulator accuracy
0.011988
Calibration procedure for an industrial robot · ICRA 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

design modification · 0.0active calibration fixture · 0.0statistical analysis · 0.0data acquisition · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Calibration procedure for an industrial robot
abstract
A calibration procedure for a manipulator in a typical industrial environment is investigated. The calibration problem is posed, and the constraints are listed for the particular task to be addressed. The robot geometry is investigated to locate the primary sources of inaccuracy. A calibration procedure is proposed that combines design modifications in the robot with active calibration fixtures in the workspace. Results of several tests are tabulated to demonstrate the success of the calibration procedure.>
Benjamin W. Mooring, T. J. Pack
ICRA2
1986 Determination and specification of robot repeatability
abstract
One of the most important specifications associated with a robot manipulator is repeatability. Unfortunately, there are no standard procedures for determining or specifying the repeatability of a robot. This situation has resulted in a good deal of confusion when attempting to use a published repeatability specification to determine if a robot will meet the requirements of an application. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to propose a systematic procedure for the determination and specification of robot repeatability. To accomplish this, three aspects of repeatability analysis are examined. First, a method of collecting data to study repeatability is discussed. A data acquisition system is described as well as an associated test procedure. Next, a procedure for utilizing the acquired data to develop a repeatability specification for a robot is proposed. This procedure results in a specification of the robot's ability to orient objects as well as the classical specification for positioning repeatability. A methodical approach to determining where in the workspace the repeatability test should be made is also addressed. Finally, an approach is presented whereby the data collected during the repeatability test may be used to determine which joints contribute most to the variations in robot repeatability.
Benjamin W. Mooring, T. J. Pack
ICRA2