Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick T. Cable II

dblp:154/0894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 77% Network security · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
forensic analysis
0.312017
Transparent Web Service Auditing via Network Provenance Functions · WWW 2017
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.112017
Transparent Web Service Auditing via Network Provenance Functions · WWW 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protocol mediation · 0.6network provenance functions · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Transparent Web Service Auditing via Network Provenance Functions
abstract
Detecting and explaining the nature of attacks in distributed web services is often difficult -- determining the nature of suspicious activity requires following the trail of an attacker through a chain of heterogeneous software components including load balancers, proxies, worker nodes, and storage services. Unfortunately, existing forensic solutions cannot provide the necessary context to link events across complex workflows, particularly in instances where application layer semantics (e.g., SQL queries, RPCs) are needed to understand the attack. In this work, we present a transparent provenance-based approach for auditing web services through the introduction of Network Provenance Functions (NPFs). NPFs are a distributed architecture for capturing detailed data provenance for web service components, leveraging the key insight that mediation of an application's protocols can be used to infer its activities without requiring invasive instrumentation or developer cooperation. We design and implement NPF with consideration for the complexity of modern cloud-based web services, and evaluate our architecture against a variety of applications including DVDStore, RUBiS, and WikiBench to show that our system imposes as little as 9.3% average end-to-end overhead on connections for realistic workloads. Finally, we consider several scenarios in which our system can be used to concisely explain attacks. NPF thus enables the hassle-free deployment of semantically rich provenance-based auditing for complex applications workflows in the Cloud.
Adam Bates 0001, Wajih Ul Hassan, Kevin R. B. Butler, Alin Dobra, Bradley Reaves, Patrick T. Cable II, Thomas Moyer, Nabil Schear
WWW6
2016 Bootstrapping and maintaining trust in the cloud
Nabil Schear, Patrick T. Cable II, Thomas Moyer, Bryan Richard, Robert Rudd
ACSAC2
2015 Spyglass: Demand-Provisioned Linux Containers for Private Network Access
Patrick T. Cable II, Nabil Schear
LISA1
2014 Demand-Provisioned Linux Containers for Private Network Access
Patrick T. Cable II
LISA1