VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Runjing Liu
dblp:154/0910
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 70% Optimization for machine learning · 30% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › amortized inference
amortized variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Variational Inference for Deblending Crowded Starfields · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Variational Inference for Deblending Crowded Starfields · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
rao-blackwellization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Rao-Blackwellized Stochastic Gradients for Discrete Distributions · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient estimation
stochastic gradient estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Rao-Blackwellized Stochastic Gradients for Discrete Distributions · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Rao-Blackwellized Stochastic Gradients for Discrete Distributions · ICML 2019 |
Computational science and engineering
astronomy |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Variational Inference for Deblending Crowded Starfields · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
discrete distribution |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Rao-Blackwellized Stochastic Gradients for Discrete Distributions · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.3forward KL divergence · 1.3MCMC · 1.3unbiased estimator · 0.4rao-blackwellization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Variational Inference for Deblending Crowded StarfieldsabstractIn images collected by astronomical surveys, stars and galaxies often overlap visually. Deblending is the task of distinguishing and characterizing individual light sources in survey images. We propose StarNet, a Bayesian method to deblend sources in astronomical images of crowded star fields. StarNet leverages recent advances in variational inference, including amortized variational distributions and an optimization objective targeting an expectation of the forward KL divergence. In our experiments with SDSS images of the M2 globular cluster, StarNet is substantially more accurate than two competing methods: Probabilistic Cataloging (PCAT), a method that uses MCMC for inference, and DAOPHOT, a software pipeline employed by SDSS for deblending. In addition, the amortized approach to inference gives StarNet the scaling characteristics necessary to perform Bayesian inference on modern astronomical surveys. Runjing Liu, Jon D. McAuliffe, Jeffrey Regier |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2019 | A Swiss Army Infinitesimal JackknifeabstractThe error or variability of machine learning algorithms is often assessed by repeatedly refitting a model with different weighted versions of the observed data. The ubiquitous tools of cross-validation (CV) and the bootstrap are examples of this technique. These methods are powerful in large part due to their model agnosticism but can be slow to run on modern, large data sets due to the need to repeatedly re-fit the model. In this work, we use a linear approximation to the dependence of the fitting procedure on the weights, producing results that can be faster than repeated re-fitting by an order of magnitude. This linear approximation is sometimes known as the "infinitesimal jackknife" in the statistics literature, where it is mostly used as a theoretical tool to prove asymptotic results. We provide explicit finite-sample error bounds for the infinitesimal jackknife in terms of a small number of simple, verifiable assumptions. Our results apply whether the weights and data are stochastic or deterministic, and so can be used as a tool for proving the accuracy of the infinitesimal jackknife on a wide variety of problems. As a corollary, we state mild regularity conditions under which our approximation consistently estimates true leave k-out cross-validation for any fixed k. These theoretical results, together with modern automatic differentiation software, support the application of the infinitesimal jackknife to a wide variety of practical problems in machine learning, providing a "Swiss Army infinitesimal jackknife." We demonstrate the accuracy of our methods on a range of simulated and real datasets. Ryan Giordano, William T. Stephenson, Runjing Liu, Michael I. Jordan, Tamara Broderick |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2019 | Rao-Blackwellized Stochastic Gradients for Discrete DistributionsabstractWe wish to compute the gradient of an expectation over a finite or countably infinite sample space having K $\leq$ $\infty$ categories. When K is indeed infinite, or finite but very large, the relevant summation is intractable. Accordingly, various stochastic gradient estimators have been proposed. In this paper, we describe a technique that can be applied to reduce the variance of any such estimator, without changing its bias{—}in particular, unbiasedness is retained. We show that our technique is an instance of Rao-Blackwellization, and we demonstrate the improvement it yields on a semi-supervised classification problem and a pixel attention task. Runjing Liu, Jeffrey Regier, Nilesh Tripuraneni, Michael I. Jordan, Jon D. McAuliffe |
ICML | 1 |