Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jack Zhang
dblp:154/6209
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1071-7975ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair representation learning
fair dimensionality reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › job scheduling
datacenter scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
latency-critical applications |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
performance isolation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
t-SNE · 0.8maximum mean discrepancy · 0.8lagrangian binary search · 0.8autoencoding · 0.8stochastic gradient descent · 0.6momentum · 0.6adam · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract)abstractUnsupervised learning methods such as principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and autoencoding are regularly used in dimensionality reduction within the statistical learning scene. However, despite a pivot toward fairness and explainability in machine learning over the past few years, there have been few rigorous attempts toward a generalized framework of fair and explainable representation learning. Our paper explores the possibility of such a framework that leverages maximum mean discrepancy to remove information derived from a protected class from generated representations. For the optimization, we introduce a binary search component to optimize the Lagrangian coefficients. We present rigorous mathematical analysis and experimental results of our framework applied to t-SNE. Alexandru Lopotenco, Ian Tong Pan, Jack Zhang, Guan Xiong Qiao |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2022 | Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract)abstractPopular first-order stochastic optimization methods for deep neural networks (DNNs) are usually either accelerated schemes (e.g. stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with momentum) or adaptive step-size methods (e.g. Adam/AdaMax, AdaBelief). In many contexts, including image classification with DNNs, adaptive methods tend to generalize poorly compared to SGD, i.e. get stuck in non-robust local minima; however, SGD typically converges slower. We analyze possible reasons for this behavior by modeling gradient updates as vectors of random variables and comparing them to probabilistic bounds to identify "meaningful" updates. Through experiments, we observe that only layers close to the output have "definitely non-random" update behavior. In the future, the tools developed here may be useful in rigorously quantifying and analyzing intuitions about why some optimizers and particular DNN architectures perform better than others. Jack Zhang, Guan Xiong Qiao, Alexandru Lopotenco, Ian Tong Pan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services
Calin Iorgulescu, Youngjin Kwon, Sameh Elnikety, Manoj Syamala, Vivek R. Narasayya, Herodotos Herodotou, Paulo Tomita, Alex Chen, Jack Zhang |
USENIX ATC | 10 |