Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Zhang

dblp:154/6209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1071-7975ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.812024
Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair representation learning
fair dimensionality reduction
0.812024
Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair representation learning
0.812024
Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate
0.612022
Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.612022
Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.612022
Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.312018
PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing › job scheduling
datacenter scheduling
0.312018
PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
latency-critical applications
0.312018
PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
performance isolation
0.312018
PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services · USENIX ATC 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

t-SNE · 0.8maximum mean discrepancy · 0.8lagrangian binary search · 0.8autoencoding · 0.8stochastic gradient descent · 0.6momentum · 0.6adam · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fair Representation Learning with Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distance Constraint (Student Abstract)
abstract
Unsupervised learning methods such as principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and autoencoding are regularly used in dimensionality reduction within the statistical learning scene. However, despite a pivot toward fairness and explainability in machine learning over the past few years, there have been few rigorous attempts toward a generalized framework of fair and explainable representation learning. Our paper explores the possibility of such a framework that leverages maximum mean discrepancy to remove information derived from a protected class from generated representations. For the optimization, we introduce a binary search component to optimize the Lagrangian coefficients. We present rigorous mathematical analysis and experimental results of our framework applied to t-SNE.
Alexandru Lopotenco, Ian Tong Pan, Jack Zhang, Guan Xiong Qiao
AAAI3
2022 Understanding Stochastic Optimization Behavior at the Layer Update Level (Student Abstract)
abstract
Popular first-order stochastic optimization methods for deep neural networks (DNNs) are usually either accelerated schemes (e.g. stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with momentum) or adaptive step-size methods (e.g. Adam/AdaMax, AdaBelief). In many contexts, including image classification with DNNs, adaptive methods tend to generalize poorly compared to SGD, i.e. get stuck in non-robust local minima; however, SGD typically converges slower. We analyze possible reasons for this behavior by modeling gradient updates as vectors of random variables and comparing them to probabilistic bounds to identify "meaningful" updates. Through experiments, we observe that only layers close to the output have "definitely non-random" update behavior. In the future, the tools developed here may be useful in rigorously quantifying and analyzing intuitions about why some optimizers and particular DNN architectures perform better than others.
Jack Zhang, Guan Xiong Qiao, Alexandru Lopotenco, Ian Tong Pan
AAAI1
2018 PerfIso: Performance Isolation for Commercial Latency-Sensitive Services
Calin Iorgulescu, Youngjin Kwon, Sameh Elnikety, Manoj Syamala, Vivek R. Narasayya, Herodotos Herodotou, Paulo Tomita, Alex Chen, Jack Zhang
USENIX ATC10