Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pritish Mohapatra
dblp:155/1908
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 45% Optimization for machine learning · 25% Video understanding and tracking · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Efficient Optimization for Rank-Based Loss Functions · CVPR 2018 Efficient Optimization for Average Precision SVM · NIPS 2014 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimizing Average Precision Using Weakly Supervised Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
character recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimizing Average Precision Using Weakly Supervised Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimizing Average Precision Using Weakly Supervised Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
average precision optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Efficient Optimization for Average Precision SVM · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Efficient Optimization for Average Precision SVM · NIPS 2014 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › effectiveness metrics
average precision |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Efficient Optimization for Average Precision SVM · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › metric optimization
non-decomposable performance measure optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Efficient Optimization for Rank-Based Loss Functions · CVPR 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Partial Linearization Based Optimization for Multi-class SVM · ECCV (5) 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured hinge loss · 0.7quicksort-based algorithm · 0.7partial linearization · 0.5support vector machine · 0.4convex optimization · 0.4direct-loss minimization · 0.3direct loss minimization · 0.3weakly supervised learning · 0.2latent SVM · 0.2average precision optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Learning to Round for Discrete Labeling ProblemsabstractDiscrete labeling problems are often solved by formulating them as an integer program, and relaxing the integrality constraint to a continuous domain. While the continuous relaxation is closely related to the original integer program, its optimal solution is often fractional. Thus, the success of a relaxation depends crucially on the availability of an accurate rounding procedure. The problem of identifying an accurate rounding procedure has mainly been tackled in the theoretical computer science community through mathematical analysis of the worst-case. However, this approach is both onerous and ignores the distribution of the data encountered in practice. We present a novel interpretation of rounding procedures as sampling from a latent variable model, which opens the door to the use of powerful machine learning formulations in their design. Inspired by the recent success of deep latent variable models we parameterize rounding procedures as a neural network, which lends itself to efficient optimization via back propagation. By minimizing the expected value of the objective of the discrete labeling problem over training samples, we learn a rounding procedure that is more suited to the task at hand. Using both synthetic and real world data sets, we demonstrate that our approach can outperform the state-of-the-art hand-designed rounding procedures. Pritish Mohapatra, C. V. Jawahar, M. Pawan Kumar |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | Efficient Optimization for Rank-Based Loss FunctionsabstractThe accuracy of information retrieval systems is often measured using complex loss functions such as the average precision (AP) or the normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG). Given a set of positive and negative samples, the parameters of a retrieval system can be estimated by minimizing these loss functions. However, the non-differentiability and non-decomposability of these loss functions does not allow for simple gradient based optimization algorithms. This issue is generally circumvented by either optimizing a structured hinge-loss upper bound to the loss function or by using asymptotic methods like the direct-loss minimization framework. Yet, the high computational complexity of loss-augmented inference, which is necessary for both the frameworks, prohibits its use in large training data sets. To alleviate this deficiency, we present a novel quicksort flavored algorithm for a large class of non-decomposable loss functions. We provide a complete characterization of the loss functions that are amenable to our algorithm, and show that it includes both AP and NDCG based loss functions. Furthermore, we prove that no comparison based algorithm can improve upon the computational complexity of our approach asymptotically. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in the context of optimizing the structured hinge loss upper bound of AP and NDCG loss for learning models for a variety of vision tasks. We show that our approach provides significantly better results than simpler decomposable loss functions, while requiring a comparable training time. Pritish Mohapatra, Michal Rolínek, C. V. Jawahar, Vladimir Kolmogorov, M. Pawan Kumar |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2016 | Partial Linearization Based Optimization for Multi-class SVM
Pritish Mohapatra, Puneet K. Dokania, C. V. Jawahar, M. Pawan Kumar |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2015 | Optimizing Average Precision Using Weakly Supervised DataabstractMany tasks in computer vision, such as action classification and object detection, require us to rank a set of samples according to their relevance to a particular visual category. The performance of such tasks is often measured in terms of the average precision (AP). Yet it is common practice to employ the support vector machine (SVM) classifier, which optimizes a surrogate 0-1 loss. The popularity of SVM can be attributed to its empirical performance. Specifically, in fully supervised settings, SVM tends to provide similar accuracy to AP-SVM, which directly optimizes an AP-based loss. However, we hypothesize that in the significantly more challenging and practically useful setting of weakly supervised learning, it becomes crucial to optimize the right accuracy measure. In order to test this hypothesis, we propose a novel latent AP-SVM that minimizes a carefully designed upper bound on the AP-based loss function over weakly supervised samples. Using publicly available datasets, we demonstrate the advantage of our approach over standard loss-based learning frameworks on three challenging problems: action classification, character recognition and object detection. Aseem Behl, Pritish Mohapatra, C. V. Jawahar, M. Pawan Kumar |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2014 | Efficient Optimization for Average Precision SVM
Pritish Mohapatra, C. V. Jawahar, M. Pawan Kumar |
NIPS | 1 |