Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dimitris Stamos
dblp:155/1951 · also Dimitrios Stamos
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning theory · 41% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Online-Within-Online Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2019 Learning To Learn Around A Common Mean · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
regularization |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | New Perspectives on k-Support and Cluster Norms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 Spectral k-Support Norm Regularization · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
low-rank regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Leveraging Low-Rank Relations Between Surrogate Tasks in Structured Prediction · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Leveraging Low-Rank Relations Between Surrogate Tasks in Structured Prediction · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online-Within-Online Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
online meta-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online-Within-Online Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › no-regret algorithms
online mirror descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online-Within-Online Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Leveraging Low-Rank Relations Between Surrogate Tasks in Structured Prediction · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function
surrogate loss |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Leveraging Low-Rank Relations Between Surrogate Tasks in Structured Prediction · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning To Learn Around A Common Mean · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
meta-learning theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning To Learn Around A Common Mean · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | New Perspectives on k-Support and Cluster Norms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
dataset bias |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Learning with dataset bias in latent subcategory models · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Learning with dataset bias in latent subcategory models · CVPR 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Spectral k-Support Norm Regularization · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › regularization theory
norm regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Spectral k-Support Norm Regularization · NIPS 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral norm regularization · 0.4trace norm regularization · 0.4online-to-batch conversion · 0.4online mirror descent · 0.4excess risk bounds · 0.4convex relaxation · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.3ridge regression · 0.3least squares · 0.3proximity operator computation · 0.2support vector machine · 0.2latent variable model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Online Parameter-Free Learning of Multiple Low Variance TasksabstractWe propose a method to learn a common bias vector for a growing sequence of low-variance tasks. Unlike state-of-the-art approaches, our method does not require tuning any hyper-parameter. Our approach is presented in the non-statistical setting and can be of two variants. The “aggressive” one updates the bias after each datapoint, the “lazy” one updates the bias only at the end of each task. We derive an across-tasks regret bound for the method. When compared to state-of-the-art approaches, the aggressive variant returns faster rates, the lazy one recovers standard rates, but with no need of tuning hyper-parameters. We then adapt the methods to the statistical setting: the aggressive variant becomes a multi-task learning method, the lazy one a meta-learning method. Experiments confirm the effectiveness of our methods in practice. Giulia Denevi, Massimiliano Pontil, Dimitris Stamos |
UAI | 3 |
| 2019 | Leveraging Low-Rank Relations Between Surrogate Tasks in Structured PredictionabstractWe study the interplay between surrogate methods for structured prediction and techniques from multitask learning designed to leverage relationships between surrogate outputs. We propose an efficient algorithm based on trace norm regularization which, differently from previous methods, does not require explicit knowledge of the coding/decoding functions of the surrogate framework. As a result, our algorithm can be applied to the broad class of problems in which the surrogate space is large or even infinite dimensional. We study excess risk bounds for trace norm regularized structured prediction proving the consistency and learning rates for our estimator. We also identify relevant regimes in which our approach can enjoy better generalization performance than previous methods. Numerical experiments on ranking problems indicate that enforcing low-rank relations among surrogate outputs may indeed provide a significant advantage in practice. Giulia Luise, Dimitris Stamos, Massimiliano Pontil, Carlo Ciliberto |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Online-Within-Online Meta-LearningabstractWe study the problem of learning a series of tasks in a fully online Meta-Learning setting. The goal is to exploit similarities among the tasks to incrementally adapt an inner online algorithm in order to incur a low averaged cumulative error over the tasks. We focus on a family of inner algorithms based on a parametrized variant of online Mirror Descent. The inner algorithm is incrementally adapted by an online Mirror Descent meta-algorithm using the corresponding within-task minimum regularized empirical risk as the meta-loss. In order to keep the process fully online, we approximate the meta-subgradients by the online inner algorithm. An upper bound on the approximation error allows us to derive a cumulative error bound for the proposed method. Our analysis can also be converted to the statistical setting by online-to-batch arguments. We instantiate two examples of the framework in which the meta-parameter is either a common bias vector or feature map. Finally, preliminary numerical experiments confirm our theoretical findings. Giulia Denevi, Dimitris Stamos, Carlo Ciliberto, Massimiliano Pontil |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Learning To Learn Around A Common MeanabstractThe problem of learning-to-learn (LTL) or meta-learning is gaining increasing attention due to recent empirical evidence of its effectiveness in applications. The goal addressed in LTL is to select an algorithm that works well on tasks sampled from a meta-distribution. In this work, we consider the family of algorithms given by a variant of Ridge Regression, in which the regularizer is the square distance to an unknown mean vector. We show that, in this setting, the LTL problem can be reformulated as a Least Squares (LS) problem and we exploit a novel meta- algorithm to efficiently solve it. At each iteration the meta-algorithm processes only one dataset. Specifically, it firstly estimates the stochastic LS objective function, by splitting this dataset into two subsets used to train and test the inner algorithm, respectively. Secondly, it performs a stochastic gradient step with the estimated value. Under specific assumptions, we present a bound for the generalization error of our meta-algorithm, which suggests the right splitting parameter to choose. When the hyper-parameters of the problem are fixed, this bound is consistent as the number of tasks grows, even if the sample size is kept constant. Preliminary experiments confirm our theoretical findings, highlighting the advantage of our approach, with respect to independent task learning. Giulia Denevi, Carlo Ciliberto, Dimitris Stamos, Massimiliano Pontil |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | Incremental Learning-to-Learn with Statistical Guarantees
Giulia Denevi, Carlo Ciliberto, Dimitris Stamos, Massimiliano Pontil |
UAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Fitting Spectral Decay with the k-Support NormabstractThe spectral k-support norm enjoys good estimation properties in low rank matrix learning problems, empirically outperforming the trace norm. Its unit ball is the convex hull of rank k matrices with unit Frobenius norm. In this paper we generalize the norm to the spectral (k,p)-support norm, whose additional parameter p can be used to tailor the norm to the decay of the spectrum of the underlying model. We characterize the unit ball and we explicitly compute the norm. We further provide a conditional gradient method to solve regularization problems with the norm, and we derive an efficient algorithm to compute the Euclidean projection on the unit ball in the case p=∞. In numerical experiments, we show that allowing p to vary significantly improves performance over the spectral k-support norm on various matrix completion benchmarks, and better captures the spectral decay of the underlying model. Andrew M. McDonald, Massimiliano Pontil, Dimitris Stamos |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2016 | New Perspectives on k-Support and Cluster NormsabstractWe study a regularizer which is defined as a parameterized infimum of quadratics, and which we call the box-norm. We show that the $k$-support norm, a regularizer proposed by Argyriou et al. (2012) for sparse vector prediction problems, belongs to this family, and the box-norm can be generated as a perturbation of the former. We derive an improved algorithm to compute the proximity operator of the squared box-norm, and we provide a method to compute the norm. We extend the norms to matrices, introducing the spectral $k$-support norm and spectral box-norm. We note that the spectral box-norm is essentially equivalent to the cluster norm, a multitask learning regularizer introduced by Jacob et al. (2009a), and which in turn can be interpreted as a perturbation of the spectral $k$-support norm. Centering the norm is important for multitask learning and we also provide a method to use centered versions of the norms as regularizers. Numerical experiments indicate that the spectral $k$-support and box-norms and their centered variants provide state of the art performance in matrix completion and multitask learning problems respectively. Andrew M. McDonald, Massimiliano Pontil, Dimitris Stamos |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2015 | Learning with dataset bias in latent subcategory modelsabstractLatent subcategory models (LSMs) offer significant improvements over training linear support vector machines (SVMs). Training LSMs is a challenging task due to the potentially large number of local optima in the objective function and the increased model complexity which requires large training set sizes. Often, larger datasets are available as a collection of heterogeneous datasets. However, previous work has highlighted the possible danger of simply training a model from the combined datasets, due to the presence of bias. In this paper, we present a model which jointly learns an LSM for each dataset as well as a compound LSM. The method provides a means to borrow statistical strength from the datasets while reducing their inherent bias. In experiments we demonstrate that the compound LSM, when tested on PASCAL, LabelMe, Caltech101 and SUN09 in a leave-one-dataset-out fashion, achieves an average improvement of over 6.5% over a previous SVM-based undoing bias approach and an average improvement of over 8.5% over a standard LSM trained on the concatenation of the datasets. Dimitris Stamos, Samuele Martelli, Moin Nabi, Andrew M. McDonald, Vittorio Murino, Massimiliano Pontil |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2014 | Spectral k-Support Norm Regularization
Andrew M. McDonald, Massimiliano Pontil, Dimitris Stamos |
NIPS | 3 |