Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shari Kuroyama

dblp:155/6340 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
graph-based ranking
0.212014
Scaling Manifold Ranking Based Image Retrieval · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.212014
Scaling Manifold Ranking Based Image Retrieval · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Information retrieval › ranking › graph-based ranking
manifold ranking
0.212014
Scaling Manifold Ranking Based Image Retrieval · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Information retrieval
ranking
0.212014
Scaling Manifold Ranking Based Image Retrieval · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper bound estimation · 0.2sparse matrix computation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Scaling Manifold Ranking Based Image Retrieval
abstract
Manifold Ranking is a graph-based ranking algorithm being successfully applied to retrieve images from multimedia databases. Given a query image, Manifold Ranking computes the ranking scores of images in the database by exploiting the relationships among them expressed in the form of a graph. Since Manifold Ranking effectively utilizes the global structure of the graph, it is significantly better at finding intuitive results compared with current approaches. Fundamentally, Manifold Ranking requires an inverse matrix to compute ranking scores and so needs O ( n 3 ) time, where n is the number of images. Manifold Ranking, unfortunately, does not scale to support databases with large numbers of images. Our solution, Mogul , is based on two ideas: (1) It efficiently computes ranking scores by sparse matrices, and (2) It skips unnecessary score computations by estimating upper bounding scores. These two ideas reduce the time complexity of Mogul to O ( n ) from O ( n 3 ) of the inverse matrix approach. Experiments show that Mogul is much faster and gives significantly better retrieval quality than a state-of-the-art approximation approach.
Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Go Irie, Shari Kuroyama, Makoto Onizuka
Proc. VLDB Endow.3