Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Søren Kaae Sønderby
dblp:156/0207
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.8 | 3 | 2016 | Ladder Variational Autoencoders · NIPS 2016 Auxiliary Deep Generative Models · ICML 2016 Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | An introduction to deep learning on biological sequence data: examples and solutions · Bioinform. 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | An introduction to deep learning on biological sequence data: examples and solutions · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein subcellular localization prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | An introduction to deep learning on biological sequence data: examples and solutions · Bioinform. 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
auxiliary variable |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Auxiliary Deep Generative Models · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
hierarchical latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Ladder Variational Autoencoders · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
hierarchical representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Ladder Variational Autoencoders · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Sequential Neural Models with Stochastic Layers · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › similarity measure
learned similarity measure |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Auxiliary Deep Generative Models · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Sequential Neural Models with Stochastic Layers · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
stochastic recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Sequential Neural Models with Stochastic Layers · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Ladder Variational Autoencoders · NIPS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 0.9recurrent neural network · 0.5variational inference · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.3structured variational inference · 0.2skip connections · 0.2ladder network · 0.2batch normalization · 0.2auxiliary variables · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learningabstractMOTIVATION: The prediction of eukaryotic protein subcellular localization is a well-studied topic in bioinformatics due to its relevance in proteomics research. Many machine learning methods have been successfully applied in this task, but in most of them, predictions rely on annotation of homologues from knowledge databases. For novel proteins where no annotated homologues exist, and for predicting the effects of sequence variants, it is desirable to have methods for predicting protein properties from sequence information only. RESULTS: Here, we present a prediction algorithm using deep neural networks to predict protein subcellular localization relying only on sequence information. At its core, the prediction model uses a recurrent neural network that processes the entire protein sequence and an attention mechanism identifying protein regions important for the subcellular localization. The model was trained and tested on a protein dataset extracted from one of the latest UniProt releases, in which experimentally annotated proteins follow more stringent criteria than previously. We demonstrate that our model achieves a good accuracy (78% for 10 categories; 92% for membrane-bound or soluble), outperforming current state-of-the-art algorithms, including those relying on homology information. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method is available as a web server at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/DeepLoc. Example code is available at https://github.com/JJAlmagro/subcellular_localization. The dataset is available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/DeepLoc/data.php. CONTACT: [email protected]. José Juan Almagro Armenteros, Casper Kaae Sønderby, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Henrik Nielsen, Ole Winther |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2017 | DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learningabstractBioinformatics (2017) doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx431 The authors of the above article wish to inform readers that the following change has been made post-publication: Sentence “If the Gorodkin measure is squared, the ‘generalized squared correlation’ (GC2) of Baldi et al. (2000) is obtained” has now been corrected to: “For K = 2, the Gorodkin measure squared is the ‘generalized squared correlation’ (GC2) of Baldi et al. (2000).” José Juan Almagro Armenteros, Casper Kaae Sønderby, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Henrik Nielsen, Ole Winther |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2017 | An introduction to deep learning on biological sequence data: examples and solutionsabstractMOTIVATION: Deep neural network architectures such as convolutional and long short-term memory networks have become increasingly popular as machine learning tools during the recent years. The availability of greater computational resources, more data, new algorithms for training deep models and easy to use libraries for implementation and training of neural networks are the drivers of this development. The use of deep learning has been especially successful in image recognition; and the development of tools, applications and code examples are in most cases centered within this field rather than within biology. RESULTS: Here, we aim to further the development of deep learning methods within biology by providing application examples and ready to apply and adapt code templates. Given such examples, we illustrate how architectures consisting of convolutional and long short-term memory neural networks can relatively easily be designed and trained to state-of-the-art performance on three biological sequence problems: prediction of subcellular localization, protein secondary structure and the binding of peptides to MHC Class II molecules. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All implementations and datasets are available online to the scientific community at https://github.com/vanessajurtz/lasagne4bio. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Vanessa Isabell Jurtz, Alexander Rosenberg Johansen, Morten Nielsen 0001, José Juan Almagro Armenteros, Henrik Nielsen, Casper Kaae Sønderby, Ole Winther, Søren Kaae Sønderby |
Bioinform. | 8 |
| 2016 | Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metricabstractWe present an autoencoder that leverages learned representations to better measure similarities in data space. By combining a variational autoencoder (VAE) with a generative adversarial network (GAN) we can use learned feature representations in the GAN discriminator as basis for the VAE reconstruction objective. Thereby, we replace element-wise errors with feature-wise errors to better capture the data distribution while offering invariance towards e.g. translation. We apply our method to images of faces and show that it outperforms VAEs with element-wise similarity measures in terms of visual fidelity. Moreover, we show that the method learns an embedding in which high-level abstract visual features (e.g. wearing glasses) can be modified using simple arithmetic. Anders Boesen Lindbo Larsen, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Hugo Larochelle, Ole Winther |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Auxiliary Deep Generative ModelsabstractDeep generative models parameterized by neural networks have recently achieved state-of-the-art performance in unsupervised and semi-supervised learning. We extend deep generative models with auxiliary variables which improves the variational approximation. The auxiliary variables leave the generative model unchanged but make the variational distribution more expressive. Inspired by the structure of the auxiliary variable we also propose a model with two stochastic layers and skip connections. Our findings suggest that more expressive and properly specified deep generative models converge faster with better results. We show state-of-the-art performance within semi-supervised learning on MNIST, SVHN and NORB datasets. Lars Maaløe, Casper Kaae Sønderby, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Ole Winther |
ICML | 3 |
| 2016 | Sequential Neural Models with Stochastic LayersabstractHow can we efficiently propagate uncertainty in a latent state representation with recurrent neural networks? This paper introduces stochastic recurrent neural networks which glue a deterministic recurrent neural network and a state space model together to form a stochastic and sequential neural generative model. The clear separation of deterministic and stochastic layers allows a structured variational inference network to track the factorization of the model’s posterior distribution. By retaining both the nonlinear recursive structure of a recurrent neural network and averaging over the uncertainty in a latent path, like a state space model, we improve the state of the art results on the Blizzard and TIMIT speech modeling data sets by a large margin, while achieving comparable performances to competing methods on polyphonic music modeling. Marco Fraccaro, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Ulrich Paquet, Ole Winther |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2016 | Ladder Variational AutoencodersabstractVariational autoencoders are powerful models for unsupervised learning. However deep models with several layers of dependent stochastic variables are difficult to train which limits the improvements obtained using these highly expressive models. We propose a new inference model, the Ladder Variational Autoencoder, that recursively corrects the generative distribution by a data dependent approximate likelihood in a process resembling the recently proposed Ladder Network. We show that this model provides state of the art predictive log-likelihood and tighter log-likelihood lower bound compared to the purely bottom-up inference in layered Variational Autoencoders and other generative models. We provide a detailed analysis of the learned hierarchical latent representation and show that our new inference model is qualitatively different and utilizes a deeper more distributed hierarchy of latent variables. Finally, we observe that batch-normalization and deterministic warm-up (gradually turning on the KL-term) are crucial for training variational models with many stochastic layers. Casper Kaae Sønderby, Tapani Raiko, Lars Maaløe, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Ole Winther |
NIPS | 4 |