Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neil C. Rabinowitz
dblp:156/0289
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-4030-1567ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 47% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 Making Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration Problems · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | Explainability Via Causal Self-Talk · NeurIPS 2022 On the importance of single directions for generalization · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Relational Forward Models for Multi-Agent Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2019 The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planning · ICML 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structure · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainability Via Causal Self-Talk · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › goal-conditioned reinforcement learning
language-conditioned reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structure · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal representation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
novelty-based exploration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › natural language explanation
self-explanation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Explainability Via Causal Self-Talk · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › exploration in markov decision processes
hard exploration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Making Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration Problems · ICLR 2020 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Making Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration Problems · ICLR 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Relational Forward Models for Multi-Agent Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Machine Theory of Mind · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Machine Theory of Mind · ICML 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Machine Theory of Mind · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
pre-trained representations |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | On the importance of single directions for generalization · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep reinforcement learning · 1.1vision-language pretraining · 0.6on-policy RL · 0.6off-policy RL · 0.6language prediction · 0.6explanation training · 0.6causal models · 0.6demonstration-based learning · 0.4relational model · 0.4graph neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structureabstractInferring the abstract relational and causal structure of the world is a major challenge for reinforcement-learning (RL) agents. For humans, language{—}particularly in the form of explanations{—}plays a considerable role in overcoming this challenge. Here, we show that language can play a similar role for deep RL agents in complex environments. While agents typically struggle to acquire relational and causal knowledge, augmenting their experience by training them to predict language descriptions and explanations can overcome these limitations. We show that language can help agents learn challenging relational tasks, and examine which aspects of language contribute to its benefits. We then show that explanations can help agents to infer not only relational but also causal structure. Language can shape the way that agents to generalize out-of-distribution from ambiguous, causally-confounded training, and explanations even allow agents to learn to perform experimental interventions to identify causal relationships. Our results suggest that language description and explanation may be powerful tools for improving agent learning and generalization. Andrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Ishita Dasgupta 0001, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, Allison C. Tam, James L. McClelland, Adam Santoro, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Jane X. Wang, Felix Hill |
ICML | 9 |
| 2022 | Explainability Via Causal Self-TalkabstractExplaining the behavior of AI systems is an important problem that, in practice, is generally avoided. While the XAI community has been developing an abundance of techniques, most incur a set of costs that the wider deep learning community has been unwilling to pay in most situations. We take a pragmatic view of the issue, and define a set of desiderata that capture both the ambitions of XAI and the practical constraints of deep learning. We describe an effective way to satisfy all the desiderata: train the AI system to build a causal model of itself. We develop an instance of this solution for Deep RL agents: Causal Self-Talk. CST operates by training the agent to communicate with itself across time. We implement this method in a simulated 3D environment, and show how it enables agents to generate faithful and semantically-meaningful explanations of their own behavior. Beyond explanations, we also demonstrate that these learned models provide new ways of building semantic control interfaces to AI systems. Nicholas A. Roy, Junkyung Kim, Neil C. Rabinowitz |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained RepresentationsabstractEffective exploration is a challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). Novelty-based exploration methods can suffer in high-dimensional state spaces, such as continuous partially-observable 3D environments. We address this challenge by defining novelty using semantically meaningful state abstractions, which can be found in learned representations shaped by natural language. In particular, we evaluate vision-language representations, pretrained on natural image captioning datasets. We show that these pretrained representations drive meaningful, task-relevant exploration and improve performance on 3D simulated environments. We also characterize why and how language provides useful abstractions for exploration by considering the impacts of using representations from a pretrained model, a language oracle, and several ablations. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach with on- and off-policy RL algorithms and in two very different task domains---one that stresses the identification and manipulation of everyday objects, and one that requires navigational exploration in an expansive world. Our results suggest that using language-shaped representations could improve exploration for various algorithms and agents in challenging environments. Allison C. Tam, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Andrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, DJ Strouse, Jane X. Wang, Andrea Banino, Felix Hill |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Making Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration Problems
Caglar Gulcehre, Tom Le Paine, Bobak Shahriari, Misha Denil, Matt Hoffman 0001, Hubert Soyer, Richard Tanburn, Steven Kapturowski, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Duncan Williams, Gabriel Barth-Maron, Ziyu Wang 0001, Nando de Freitas |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2019 | Relational Forward Models for Multi-Agent Learning
Andrea Tacchetti, H. Francis Song, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Vinícius Flores Zambaldi, János Kramár, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Thore Graepel, Matt M. Botvinick, Peter W. Battaglia |
ICLR (Poster) | 6 |
| 2018 | On the importance of single directions for generalization
Ari S. Morcos, David G. T. Barrett, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Matt M. Botvinick |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2018 | Machine Theory of MindabstractTheory of mind (ToM) broadly refers to humans’ ability to represent the mental states of others, including their desires, beliefs, and intentions. We design a Theory of Mind neural network {–} a ToMnet {–} which uses meta-learning to build such models of the agents it encounters. The ToMnet learns a strong prior model for agents’ future behaviour, and, using only a small number of behavioural observations, can bootstrap to richer predictions about agents’ characteristics and mental states. We apply the ToMnet to agents behaving in simple gridworld environments, showing that it learns to model random, algorithmic, and deep RL agents from varied populations, and that it passes classic ToM tasks such as the "Sally-Anne" test of recognising that others can hold false beliefs about the world. Neil C. Rabinowitz, Frank Perbet, H. Francis Song, Chiyuan Zhang, S. M. Ali Eslami, Matt M. Botvinick |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and PlanningabstractOne of the key challenges of artificial intelligence is to learn models that are effective in the context of planning. In this document we introduce the predictron architecture. The predictron consists of a fully abstract model, represented by a Markov reward process, that can be rolled forward multiple “imagined” planning steps. Each forward pass of the predictron accumulates internal rewards and values over multiple planning depths. The predictron is trained end-to-end so as to make these accumulated values accurately approximate the true value function. We applied the predictron to procedurally generated random mazes and a simulator for the game of pool. The predictron yielded significantly more accurate predictions than conventional deep neural network architectures. David Silver 0001, Hado van Hasselt, Matteo Hessel, Tom Schaul, Arthur Guez, Tim Harley, Gabriel Dulac-Arnold, David P. Reichert, Neil C. Rabinowitz, André Barreto 0001, Thomas Degris |
ICML | 9 |