Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brigitte Leeners

dblp:156/3556 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-4027-6151ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 75% Computational science and engineering · 25%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
model checking
0.512021
Complete populations of virtual patients for in silico clinical trials · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
parameter estimation
0.512021
Complete populations of virtual patients for in silico clinical trials · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
physiological modeling
0.512021
Complete populations of virtual patients for in silico clinical trials · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical model checking · 0.5global search · 0.5ODE modeling · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Complete populations of virtual patients for in silico clinical trials
abstract
MOTIVATION: Model-based approaches to safety and efficacy assessment of pharmacological drugs, treatment strategies or medical devices (In Silico Clinical Trial, ISCT) aim to decrease time and cost for the needed experimentations, reduce animal and human testing, and enable precision medicine. Unfortunately, in presence of non-identifiable models (e.g. reaction networks), parameter estimation is not enough to generate complete populations of Virtual Patients (VPs), i.e. populations guaranteed to show the entire spectrum of model behaviours (phenotypes), thus ensuring representativeness of the trial. RESULTS: We present methods and software based on global search driven by statistical model checking that, starting from a (non-identifiable) quantitative model of the human physiology (plus drugs PK/PD) and suitable biological and medical knowledge elicited from experts, compute a population of VPs whose behaviours are representative of the whole spectrum of phenotypes entailed by the model (completeness) and pairwise distinguishable according to user-provided criteria. This enables full granularity control on the size of the population to employ in an ISCT, guaranteeing representativeness while avoiding over-representation of behaviours. We proved the effectiveness of our algorithm on a non-identifiable ODE-based model of the female Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal axis, by generating a population of 4 830 264 VPs stratified into 7 levels (at different granularity of behaviours), and assessed its representativeness against 86 retrospective health records from Pfizer, Hannover Medical School and University Hospital of Lausanne. The datasets are respectively covered by our VPs within Average Normalized Mean Absolute Error of 15%, 20% and 35% (90% of the latter dataset is covered within 20% error). Availability and implementation. Our open-source software is available at https://bitbucket.org/mclab/vipgenerator. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Stefano Sinisi, Vadim Alimguzhin, Toni Mancini, Enrico Tronci, Brigitte Leeners
Bioinform.5
2020 Optimal Personalised Treatment Computation through In Silico Clinical Trials on Patient Digital Twins
abstract
In Silico Clinical Trials (ISCT), i.e. clinical experimental campaigns carried out by means of computer simulations, hold the promise to decrease time and cost for the safety and efficacy assessment of pharmacological treatments, reduce the need for animal and human testing, and enable precision medicine. In this paper we present methods and an algorithm that, by means of extensive computer simulation-based experimental campaigns (ISCT) guided by intelligent search, optimise a pharmacological treatment for an individual patient (precision medicine). We show the effectiveness of our approach on a case study involving a real pharmacological treatment, namely the downregulation phase of a complex clinical protocol for assisted reproduction in humans.
Stefano Sinisi, Vadim Alimguzhin, Toni Mancini, Enrico Tronci, Federico Mari, Brigitte Leeners
Fundam. Informaticae6
2014 Patient-specific models from inter-patient biological models and clinical records
abstract
One of the main goals of systems biology models in a health-care context is to individualise models in order to compute patient-specific predictions for the time evolution of species (e.g., hormones) concentrations. In this paper we present a statistical model checking based approach that, given an inter-patient model and a few clinical measurements, computes a value for the model parameter vector (model individualisation) that, with high confidence, is a global minimum for the function evaluating the mismatch between the model predictions and the available measurements. We evaluate effectiveness of the proposed approach by presenting experimental results on using the GynCycle model (describing the feedback mechanisms regulating a number of reproductive hormones) to compute patient-specific predictions for the time evolution of blood concentrations of E2 (Estradiol), P4 (Progesterone), FSH (Follicle-Stimulating Hormone) and LH (Luteinizing Hormone) after a certain number of clinical measurements.
Enrico Tronci, Toni Mancini, Ivano Salvo, Stefano Sinisi, Federico Mari, Igor Melatti, Annalisa Massini, Francesco Davì, Thomas Dierkes, Rainald Ehrig, Susanna Röblitz, Brigitte Leeners, Tillmann H. C. Kruger, Marcel Egli, Fabian Ille
FMCAD12