Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Genzel
dblp:157/3631
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2133-2579ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Learning theory · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Information theory · 78% Mathematical optimization · 22% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network expressivity |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Memorization With Neural Nets: Going Beyond the Worst Case · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
interpolation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Memorization With Neural Nets: Going Beyond the Worst Case · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › network capacity
memorization capacity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Memorization With Neural Nets: Going Beyond the Worst Case · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Recovering Structured Data From Superimposed Non-Linear Measurements · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 High-Dimensional Estimation of Structured Signals From Non-Linear Observations With General Convex Loss Functions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
additive models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › self-interpretable models
generalized additive model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video processing
image reconstruction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › inverse problem
deep learning for inverse problems |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
linear separability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
random neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › volumetric reconstruction
tomographic reconstruction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
high-dimensional estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | High-Dimensional Estimation of Structured Signals From Non-Linear Observations With General Convex Loss Functions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
structured signal recovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | High-Dimensional Estimation of Structured Signals From Non-Linear Observations With General Convex Loss Functions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › x-ray imaging
computed tomography |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
geometric analysis · 1.3total variation minimization · 1.3deep neural network · 1.3adversarial attack · 1.3iterative end-to-end network · 1.1compressed sensing · 1.1randomized algorithms · 0.8regularization · 0.7differentiable additive models · 0.7gaussian mean width · 0.6lasso · 0.4group lasso · 0.4bilinear inverse problem · 0.4restricted strong convexity · 0.3generalized lasso · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Memorization With Neural Nets: Going Beyond the Worst CaseabstractIn practice, deep neural networks are often able to easily interpolate their training data. To understand this phenomenon, many works have aimed to quantify the memorization capacity of a neural network architecture: the largest number of points such that the architecture can interpolate any placement of these points with any assignment of labels. For real-world data, however, one intuitively expects the presence of a benign structure so that interpolation already occurs at a smaller network size than suggested by memorization capacity. In this paper, we investigate interpolation by adopting an instance-specific viewpoint. We introduce a simple randomized algorithm that, given a fixed finite data set with two classes, with high probability constructs an interpolating three-layer neural network in polynomial time. The required number of parameters is linked to geometric properties of the two classes and their mutual arrangement. As a result, we obtain guarantees that are independent of the number of samples and hence move beyond worst-case memorization capacity bounds. We verify our theoretical result with numerical experiments and additionally investigate the effectiveness of the algorithm on MNIST and CIFAR-10. Sjoerd Dirksen, Patrick Finke, Martin Genzel |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2023 | Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive ModelsabstractGeneralized Additive Models (GAMs) have recently experienced a resurgence in popularity due to their interpretability, which arises from expressing the target value as a sum of non-linear transformations of the features. Despite the current enthusiasm for GAMs, their susceptibility to concurvity — i.e., (possibly non-linear) dependencies between the features — has hitherto been largely overlooked. Here, we demonstrate how concurvity can severly impair the interpretability of GAMs and propose a remedy: a conceptually simple, yet effective regularizer which penalizes pairwise correlations of the non-linearly transformed feature variables. This procedure is applicable to any differentiable additive model, such as Neural Additive Models or NeuralProphet, and enhances interpretability by eliminating ambiguities due to self-canceling feature contributions.
We validate the effectiveness of our regularizer in experiments on synthetic as well as real-world datasets for time-series and tabular data. Our experiments show that concurvity in GAMs can be reduced without significantly compromising prediction quality, improving interpretability and reducing variance in the feature importances. Julien Siems, Konstantin Ditschuneit, Winfried Ripken, Alma Lindborg, Maximilian Schambach, Johannes S. Otterbach, Martin Genzel |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included?abstractIn the past five years, deep learning methods have become state-of-the-art in solving various inverse problems. Before such approaches can find application in safety-critical fields, a verification of their reliability appears mandatory. Recent works have pointed out instabilities of deep neural networks for several image reconstruction tasks. In analogy to adversarial attacks in classification, it was shown that slight distortions in the input domain may cause severe artifacts. The present article sheds new light on this concern, by conducting an extensive study of the robustness of deep-learning-based algorithms for solving underdetermined inverse problems. This covers compressed sensing with Gaussian measurements as well as image recovery from Fourier and Radon measurements, including a real-world scenario for magnetic resonance imaging (using the NYU-fastMRI dataset). Our main focus is on computing adversarial perturbations of the measurements that maximize the reconstruction error. A distinctive feature of our approach is the quantitative and qualitative comparison with total-variation minimization, which serves as a provably robust reference method. In contrast to previous findings, our results reveal that standard end-to-end network architectures are not only resilient against statistical noise, but also against adversarial perturbations. All considered networks are trained by common deep learning techniques, without sophisticated defense strategies. Martin Genzel, Jan MacDonald, Maximilian März |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep LearningabstractThis work is concerned with the following fundamental question in scientific machine learning: Can deep-learning-based methods solve noise-free inverse problems to near-perfect accuracy? Positive evidence is provided for the first time, focusing on a prototypical computed tomography (CT) setup. We demonstrate that an iterative end-to-end network scheme enables reconstructions close to numerical precision, comparable to classical compressed sensing strategies. Our results build on our winning submission to the recent AAPM DL-Sparse-View CT Challenge. Its goal was to identify the state-of-the-art in solving the sparse-view CT inverse problem with data-driven techniques. A specific difficulty of the challenge setup was that the precise forward model remained unknown to the participants. Therefore, a key feature of our approach was to initially estimate the unknown fanbeam geometry in a data-driven calibration step. Apart from an in-depth analysis of our methodology, we also demonstrate its state-of-the-art performance on the open-access real-world dataset LoDoPaB CT. Martin Genzel, Ingo Gühring, Jan MacDonald, Maximilian März |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | The Separation Capacity of Random Neural NetworksabstractNeural networks with random weights appear in a variety of machine learning applications, most prominently as the initialization of many deep learning algorithms and as a computationally cheap alternative to fully learned neural networks. In the present article, we enhance the theoretical understanding of random neural networks by addressing the following data separation problem: under what conditions can a random neural network make two classes $\mathcal{X}^-, \mathcal{X}^+ \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ (with positive distance) linearly separable? We show that a sufficiently large two-layer ReLU-network with standard Gaussian weights and uniformly distributed biases can solve this problem with high probability. Crucially, the number of required neurons is explicitly linked to geometric properties of the underlying sets $\mathcal{X}^-, \mathcal{X}^+$ and their mutual arrangement. This instance-specific viewpoint allows us to overcome the usual curse of dimensionality (exponential width of the layers) in non-pathological situations where the data carries low-complexity structure. We quantify the relevant structure of the data in terms of a novel notion of mutual complexity (based on a localized version of Gaussian mean width), which leads to sound and informative separation guarantees. We connect our result with related lines of work on approximation, memorization, and generalization. Sjoerd Dirksen, Martin Genzel, Laurent Jacques, Alexander Stollenwerk |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2020 | Recovering Structured Data From Superimposed Non-Linear MeasurementsabstractThis work deals with the problem of distributed data acquisition under non-linear communication constraints. More specifically, we consider a model setup where M distributed nodes take individual measurements of an unknown structured source vector x0∈ ℝn, communicating their readings simultaneously to a central receiver. Since this procedure involves collisions and is usually imperfect, the receiver measures a superposition of non-linearly distorted signals. In a first step, we will show that an s-sparse vector x can be successfully recovered from O(s · log(2n/s)) of such superimposed measurements, using a traditional Lasso estimator that does not rely on any knowledge about the non-linear corruptions. This direct method however fails to work for several “uncalibrated” system configurations. These blind reconstruction tasks can be easily handled with the ℓ1,2-Group-Lasso, but coming along with an increased sampling rate of O(s · max{M, log(2n/s)}) observations - in fact, the purpose of this lifting strategy is to extend a certain class of bilinear inverse problems to non-linear acquisition. Our two algorithmic approaches are a special instance of a more abstract framework which includes sub-Gaussian measurement designs as well as general (convex) structural constraints. These results are of independent interest for various recovery and learning tasks, as they apply to arbitrary non-linear observation models. Finally, to illustrate the practical scope of our theoretical findings, an application to wireless sensor networks is discussed, which actually serves as the prototypical example of our methodology. Martin Genzel, Peter Jung 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2017 | Sparse Proteomics Analysis - a compressed sensing-based approach for feature selection and classification of high-dimensional proteomics mass spectrometry dataabstractBACKGROUND: High-throughput proteomics techniques, such as mass spectrometry (MS)-based approaches, produce very high-dimensional data-sets. In a clinical setting one is often interested in how mass spectra differ between patients of different classes, for example spectra from healthy patients vs. spectra from patients having a particular disease. Machine learning algorithms are needed to (a) identify these discriminating features and (b) classify unknown spectra based on this feature set. Since the acquired data is usually noisy, the algorithms should be robust against noise and outliers, while the identified feature set should be as small as possible. RESULTS: We present a new algorithm, Sparse Proteomics Analysis (SPA), based on the theory of compressed sensing that allows us to identify a minimal discriminating set of features from mass spectrometry data-sets. We show (1) how our method performs on artificial and real-world data-sets, (2) that its performance is competitive with standard (and widely used) algorithms for analyzing proteomics data, and (3) that it is robust against random and systematic noise. We further demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm to two previously published clinical data-sets. Tim Conrad 0001, Martin Genzel, Nada Cvetkovic, Niklas Wulkow, Alexander B. Leichtle, Jan Vybíral, Gitta Kutyniok, Christof Schütte |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | High-Dimensional Estimation of Structured Signals From Non-Linear Observations With General Convex Loss FunctionsabstractWe study the issue of estimating a structured signal x0∈ ℝnfrom non-linear and noisy Gaussian observations. Supposing that x0 is contained in a certain convex subset K ⊂ Rn, we prove that accurate recovery is already feasible if the number of observations exceeds the effective dimension of K. It will turn out that the possibly unknown non-linearity of our model affects the error rate only by a multiplicative constant. This achievement is based on recent works by Plan and Vershynin, who have suggested to treat the non-linearity rather as noise, which perturbs a linear measurement process. Using the concept of restricted strong convexity, we show that their results for the generalized Lasso can be extended to a fairly large class of convex loss functions. Moreover, we shall allow for the presence of adversarial noise so that even deterministic model inaccuracies can be coped with. These generalizations particularly give further evidence of why many standard estimators perform surprisingly well in practice, although they do not rely on any knowledge of the underlying output rule. To this end, our results provide a unified framework for signal reconstruction in high dimensions, covering various challenges from the fields of compressed sensing, signal processing, and statistical learning. Martin Genzel |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2014 | Asymptotic Analysis of Inpainting via Universal Shearlet SystemsabstractRecently introduced inpainting algorithms using a combination of applied harmonic analysis and compressed sensing have turned out to be very successful. One key ingredient is a carefully chosen representation system which provides (optimally) sparse approximations of the original image. Due to the common assumption that images are typically governed by anisotropic features, directional representation systems have often been utilized. One prominent example of this class are shearlets, which have the additional benefit of allowing faithful implementations. Numerical results show that shearlets significantly outperform wavelets in inpainting tasks. One of those software packages, ShearLab, even offers the flexibility of using a different parameter for each scale, which is not yet covered by shearlet theory. In this paper, we first introduce universal shearlet systems which are associated with an arbitrary scaling sequence, thereby modeling the previously mentioned flexibility. In addition, this novel construction allows for a smooth transition between wavelets and shearlets and therefore enables us to analyze them in a uniform fashion. For a large class of such scaling sequences, we first prove that the associated universal shearlet systems form band-limited Parseval frames for $L^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ consisting of Schwartz functions. Second, we analyze the inpainting performance of this class of universal shearlet systems within a distributional model situation using an $\ell^{1}$-analysis minimization algorithm for reconstruction. Our main result states that, provided that the scaling sequence is comparable to the size of the (scale-dependent) gap, asymptotically perfect inpainting is achieved. Martin Genzel, Gitta Kutyniok |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 1 |