Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Noever

dblp:157/6051 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Distributed computing theory · 40% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 37% Approximation and online algorithms · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel graph algorithms
0.822020
Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS · SODA 2018
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › graph algorithms
maximal independent set
0.412020
Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
randomized greedy algorithm
0.412020
Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Distributed computing theory › distributed complexity
round complexity
0.412020
Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
maximal independent set
0.312018
Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS · SODA 2018
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph theory
0.212015
Robust hamiltonicity of random directed graphs extended abstract · SODA 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
hamiltonicity
0.212015
Robust hamiltonicity of random directed graphs extended abstract · SODA 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory
random graphs
0.212015
Robust hamiltonicity of random directed graphs extended abstract · SODA 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory
directed graph
0.112015
Robust hamiltonicity of random directed graphs extended abstract · SODA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random vertex ordering · 0.9high-probability analysis · 0.9probabilistic analysis · 0.7probabilistic method · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS
abstract
We provide a tight analysis that settles the round complexity of the well-studied parallel randomized greedy MIS algorithm, thus answering the main open question of Blelloch, Fineman, and Shun [SPAA’12]. The parallel/distributed randomized greedy Maximal Independent Set (MIS) algorithm works as follows. An order of the vertices is chosen uniformly at random. Then, in each round, all vertices that appear before their neighbors in the order are added to the independent set and removed from the graph along with their neighbors. The main question of interest is the number of rounds it takes until the graph is empty. This algorithm has been studied since 1987, initiated by Coppersmith, Raghavan, and Tompa [FOCS’87], and the previously best known bounds were O (log n ) rounds in expectation for Erdős-Rényi random graphs by Calkin and Frieze [Random Struc. Alg.’90] and O (log 2 n ) rounds with high probability for general graphs by Blelloch, Fineman, and Shun [SPAA’12]. We prove a high probability upper bound of O (log n ) on the round complexity of this algorithm in general graphs and that this bound is tight. This also shows that parallel randomized greedy MIS is as fast as the celebrated algorithm of Luby [STOC’85, JALG’86].
Manuela Fischer, Andreas Noever
ACM Trans. Algorithms2
2020 A general lower bound for collaborative tree exploration
Yann Disser, Frank Mousset, Andreas Noever, Nemanja Skoric, Angelika Steger
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2018 Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS
abstract
We provide a tight analysis which settles the round complexity of the well-studied parallel randomized greedy MIS algorithm, thus answering the main open question of Blelloch, Fineman, and Shun [SPAA’12]. The parallel/distributed randomized greedy Maximal Independent Set (MIS) algorithm works as follows. An order of the vertices is chosen uniformly at random. Then, in each round, all vertices that appear before their neighbors in the order are added to the independent set and removed from the graph along with their neighbors. The main question of interest is the number of rounds it takes until the graph is empty. This algorithm has been studied since 1987, initiated by Coppersmith, Raghavan, and Tompa [FOCS’87], and the previously best known bounds were O(log n) rounds in expectation for Erdős-Rényi random graphs by Calkin and Frieze [Random Struc. & Alg. ’90] and O(log2 n) rounds with high probability for general graphs by Blelloch, Fineman, and Shun [SPAA’12]. We prove a high probability upper bound of O(log n) on the round complexity of this algorithm in general graphs, and that this bound is tight. This also shows that parallel randomized greedy MIS is as fast as the celebrated algorithm of Luby [STOC’85, JALG’86].
Manuela Fischer, Andreas Noever
SODA2
2017 A General Lower Bound for Collaborative Tree Exploration
Yann Disser, Frank Mousset, Andreas Noever, Nemanja Skoric, Angelika Steger
SIROCCO3
2015 Robust hamiltonicity of random directed graphs extended abstract
abstract
In his seminal paper from 1952 Dirac showed that the complete graph on n ≥ 3 vertices remains Hamiltonian even if we allow an adversary to remove ⌊n/2⌋ edges touching each vertex. In 1960 Ghouila-Houri obtained an analogue statement for digraphs by showing that every directed graph on n ≥ 3 vertices with minimum in- and out-degree at least n/2 contains a directed Hamilton cycle. Both statements quantify the robustness of complete graphs (digraphs) with respect to the property of containing a Hamilton cycle. A natural way to generalize such results to arbitrary graphs (digraphs) is using the notion of local resilience. The local resilience of a graph (digraph) G with respect to a property is the maximum number r such that G has the property even if we allow an adversary to remove an r-fraction of (in- and out-going) edges touching each vertex. The theorems of Dirac and Ghouila-Houri state that the local resilience of the complete graph and digraph with respect to Hamiltonicity is 1/2. Recently, this statements have been generalized to random settings. Lee and Sudakov (2012) proved that the local resilience of a random graph with edge probability p = ω (log n/n) with respect to Hamiltonicity is 1/2 ± o(1). For random directed graphs, Hefetz, Steger and Sudakov (2014+) proved an analogue statement, but only for edge probability . In this paper we significantly improve their result to p = ω (log8 n/n), which is optimal up to the polylogarithmic factor.
Asaf Ferber, Rajko Nenadov, Ueli Peter, Andreas Noever, Nemanja Skoric
SODA4