Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Isac S. Ribeiro

dblp:157/6481 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 58% Information retrieval · 42%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › user modeling
expert profiling
0.522016
The LExR Collection for Expertise Retrieval in Academia · SIGIR 2016
On Tag Recommendation for Expertise Profiling: A Case Study in the Scientific Domain · WSDM 2015
Information retrieval › search engines
expert finding
0.212016
The LExR Collection for Expertise Retrieval in Academia · SIGIR 2016
Information retrieval › evaluation
test collection
0.212016
The LExR Collection for Expertise Retrieval in Academia · SIGIR 2016
Recommender systems
tag recommendation
0.212015
On Tag Recommendation for Expertise Profiling: A Case Study in the Scientific Domain · WSDM 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2unsupervised tag recommendation · 0.2supervised tag recommendation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 The LExR Collection for Expertise Retrieval in Academia
abstract
Expertise retrieval has been the subject of intense research over the past decade, particularly with the public availability of benchmark test collections for expertise retrieval in enterprises. Another domain which has seen comparatively less research on expertise retrieval is academic search. In this paper, we describe the Lattes Expertise Retrieval (LExR) test collection for research on academic expertise retrieval. LExR has been designed to provide a large-scale benchmark for two complementary expertise retrieval tasks, namely, expert profiling and expert finding. Unlike currently available test collections, which fully support only one of these tasks, LExR provides graded relevance judgments performed by expert judges separately for each task. In addition, LExR is both cross-organization and cross-area, encompassing candidate experts from all areas of knowledge working in research institutions all over Brazil. As a result, it constitutes a valuable resource for fostering new research directions on expertise retrieval in an academic setting.
Vítor Mangaravite, Rodrygo L. T. Santos, Isac S. Ribeiro, Marcos André Gonçalves, Alberto H. F. Laender
SIGIR3
2015 On Tag Recommendation for Expertise Profiling: A Case Study in the Scientific Domain
abstract
Building expertise profiles is a crucial step towards identifying experts in different knowledge areas. However, summarizing the topics of expertise of a given individual is a challenging task, primarily due to the semi-structured and heterogeneous nature of the documentary evidence available for this task. In this paper, we investigate the suitability of tag recommendation as a mechanism to produce effective expertise profiles. In particular, we perform a large-scale user study with academic experts from different knowledge areas to assess the effectiveness of multiple supervised and unsupervised tag recommendation approaches as well as multiple sources of textual evidence. Our analysis reveals that traditional content-based tag recommenders perform well at identifying expertise-oriented tags, with article keywords being a particularly effective source of evidence across profiles in different knowledge areas and with various levels of sparsity. Moreover, by combining multiple recommenders and sources of evidence as learning signals, we further demonstrate the effectiveness of tag recommendation for expertise profiling.
Isac S. Ribeiro, Rodrygo L. T. Santos, Marcos André Gonçalves, Alberto H. F. Laender
WSDM1