Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cristobal Ortega

dblp:157/8358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3624-1693ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Energy-efficient computing · 68% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 25% Parallel and multicore computing · 8%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.712023
Adaptive Power Shifting for Power-Constrained Heterogeneous Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › reconfigurable architecture
dynamic configuration
0.512021
Intelligent Adaptation of Hardware Knobs for Improving Performance and Power Consumption · IEEE Trans. Computers 2021
Energy-efficient computing › energy-constrained computing
power-constrained systems
0.212023
Adaptive Power Shifting for Power-Constrained Heterogeneous Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Parallel and multicore computing
workload adaptation
0.112021
Intelligent Adaptation of Hardware Knobs for Improving Performance and Power Consumption · IEEE Trans. Computers 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utilization-aware power shifting · 0.7dynamic budget redistribution · 0.7online profiling · 0.5dynamic management · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Adaptive Power Shifting for Power-Constrained Heterogeneous Systems
abstract
The number and heterogeneity of compute devices, even within a single compute node, has been steadily on the rise. Since all systems must operate under a power cap, the number of discrete devices that can run simultaneously at their highest frequency is limited by the globally-imposed power cap. Current systems incorporate a centralized power management unit that statically controls the distribution of power among the devices within the node. However, such static distribution policies are unaware of the dynamic utilization profile across the devices, which leads to unfair power allocations that end up degrading system throughput performance. The problem is particularly acute in the presence of heterogeneity since type-specific performance-boost capabilities cannot be leveraged via utilization-agnostic static power allocations. This paper proposes Adaptive Power Shifting for multi-accelerator heterogeneous systems (APS), a technique that leverages system utilization information to dynamically allocate and re-distribute power budgets across multiple discrete devices. Democratizing the power allocation based on dynamic needs results in dramatic speedup over a need-agnostic static allocation. We use APS in a real OpenPOWER compute node with 2 CPUs and 4 GPUs to demonstrate the value of on-demand, equitable power allocations. Overall, the proposed solution increases performance with respect to two state-of-the-art techniques by up to 14.9% and 13.8%.
Cristobal Ortega, Lluc Alvarez, Alper Buyuktosunoglu, Ramon Bertran Monfort, Todd Rosedahl, Pradip Bose, Miquel Moretó
IEEE Trans. Computers1
2021 Intelligent Adaptation of Hardware Knobs for Improving Performance and Power Consumption
abstract
Current microprocessors include several knobs to modify the hardware behavior in order to improve performance, power, and energy under different workload demands. An impractical and time consuming offline profiling is needed to evaluate the design space to find the optimal knob configuration. Different knobs are typically configured in a decoupled manner to avoid the time-consuming offline profiling process. This can often lead to underperforming configurations and conflicting decisions that jeopardize system power-performance efficiency. Thus, a dynamic management of the different hardware knobs is necessary to find the knob configuration that maximizes system power-performance efficiency without the burden of offline profiling. In this article, we propose libPRISM, an infrastructure that enables the transparent management of multiple hardware knobs in order to adapt the system to the evolving demands of hardware resources in different workloads. libPRISM can minimize execution time, energy-delay product or power consumption by dynamically managing the SMT level, the data prefetcher, and the DVFS hardware knobs. Overall, the proposed solutions increase performance up to 130 percent (16.9 percent on average), reduce energy-delay product up to 80 percent, and reduce power consumption up to 33 percent depending on the target metric compared to the default knob configuration of the system.
Cristobal Ortega, Lluc Alvarez, Marc Casas, Ramon Bertran Monfort, Alper Buyuktosunoglu, Alexandre E. Eichenberger, Pradip Bose, Miquel Moretó
IEEE Trans. Computers1
2017 libPRISM: an intelligent adaptation of prefetch and SMT levels
abstract
Current microprocessors include several knobs to modify the hardware behavior in order to improve performance under different workload demands. An impractical and time consuming offline profiling is needed to evaluate the design space to find the optimal knob configuration. Different knobs are typically configured in a decoupled manner to avoid the time-consuming offline profiling process. This can often lead to underperforming configurations and sometimes to conflicting decisions that jeopardize system power- performance efficiency. Thus, a dynamic management of the different hardware knobs is necessary to find the knob configuration that maximizes system power-performance efficiency without the burden of offline profiling.
Cristobal Ortega, Miquel Moretó, Marc Casas, Ramon Bertran Monfort, Alper Buyuktosunoglu, Alexandre E. Eichenberger, Pradip Bose
ICS1