Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leila Bridgeman
dblp:158/5720 · also Leila Jasmine Bridgeman
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9367-7218ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
sampling-based model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
surgical robotics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
steady-state point ablation model · 1.7sampling-based model predictive control · 1.7random search · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser SurgeryabstractLaser-based surgical ablation relies heavily on surgeon involvement, restricting precision to the limits of human error and perception. The interaction between laser and tissue is governed by various laser parameters that control the laser irradiance on the tissue, including the power, distance, spot size, orientation, and exposure time. This complex interaction lends itself to robotic automation, allowing the surgeon to focus on high-level tasks, such as choosing the region and method of ablation, while the lower-level ablation plan can be handled autonomously. This paper describes a sampling-based model predictive control (MPC) scheme to plan ablation sequences for arbitrary tissue volumes. Using a steady-state point ablation model to simulate a single laser-tissue interaction, a random search technique explores the reachable state space while preserving sensitive tissue regions. The sampled MPC strategy provides an ablation sequence that accounts for parameter uncertainty without violating constraints, such as avoiding nerve bundles. Vincent Wang 0006, Siobhan Rigby Oca, Ethan J. LoCicero, Patrick J. Codd, Leila Bridgeman |
ICRA | 6 |
| 2024 | Trust, Safety and Efficacy of Autonomous Robotic Ultrasound Vascular Imaging Collection on Human SubjectsabstractThis paper describes the safety and efficacy of an autonomous robotic system to collect ultrasound (US) images of the peripheral vasculature of 31 human participants, while also assessing their trust and comfort with the procedure. The procedure used a custom restraint mechanism and robotic arm guided by RGB-D imaging to collect clinically meaningful US images of human vasculature in the peripheral forearm safely and autonomously. All initial presses and scanned trajectories were executed under a safety force threshold (13N), included vasculature in imaging (from trajectory selected by non-clinician), and had a full scan completion success rate of greater than 80%. Participants indicated increased trust and perception of safety in the robotic system after the procedure. The positive findings suggest that careful attention to patient safety and well-designed patient/robot interactions can positively affect human-robot interaction and change the perception of robotic systems in medical contexts. Siobhan Rigby Oca, Juan Lasso Velasco, Kara Lindstrom, Leila Bridgeman, Daniel M. Buckland |
RO-MAN | 4 |