Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leila Bridgeman

dblp:158/5720 · also Leila Jasmine Bridgeman · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9367-7218ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.912025
Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
sampling-based model predictive control
0.912025
Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025
Medical and health informatics
surgical robotics
0.912025
Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

steady-state point ablation model · 1.7sampling-based model predictive control · 1.7random search · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery
abstract
Laser-based surgical ablation relies heavily on surgeon involvement, restricting precision to the limits of human error and perception. The interaction between laser and tissue is governed by various laser parameters that control the laser irradiance on the tissue, including the power, distance, spot size, orientation, and exposure time. This complex interaction lends itself to robotic automation, allowing the surgeon to focus on high-level tasks, such as choosing the region and method of ablation, while the lower-level ablation plan can be handled autonomously. This paper describes a sampling-based model predictive control (MPC) scheme to plan ablation sequences for arbitrary tissue volumes. Using a steady-state point ablation model to simulate a single laser-tissue interaction, a random search technique explores the reachable state space while preserving sensitive tissue regions. The sampled MPC strategy provides an ablation sequence that accounts for parameter uncertainty without violating constraints, such as avoiding nerve bundles.
Vincent Wang 0006, Siobhan Rigby Oca, Ethan J. LoCicero, Patrick J. Codd, Leila Bridgeman
ICRA6
2024 Trust, Safety and Efficacy of Autonomous Robotic Ultrasound Vascular Imaging Collection on Human Subjects
abstract
This paper describes the safety and efficacy of an autonomous robotic system to collect ultrasound (US) images of the peripheral vasculature of 31 human participants, while also assessing their trust and comfort with the procedure. The procedure used a custom restraint mechanism and robotic arm guided by RGB-D imaging to collect clinically meaningful US images of human vasculature in the peripheral forearm safely and autonomously. All initial presses and scanned trajectories were executed under a safety force threshold (13N), included vasculature in imaging (from trajectory selected by non-clinician), and had a full scan completion success rate of greater than 80%. Participants indicated increased trust and perception of safety in the robotic system after the procedure. The positive findings suggest that careful attention to patient safety and well-designed patient/robot interactions can positively affect human-robot interaction and change the perception of robotic systems in medical contexts.
Siobhan Rigby Oca, Juan Lasso Velasco, Kara Lindstrom, Leila Bridgeman, Daniel M. Buckland
RO-MAN4