In 2013, Marcus, Spielman, and Srivastava resolved the famous Kadison-Singer conjecture. It states that for $n$ independent random vectors $v_1,\cdots, v_n$ that have expected squared norm bounded by $ε$ and are in the isotropic position in expectation, there is a positive probability that the determinant polynomial $\det(xI - \sum_{i=1}^n v_iv_i^\top)$ has roots bounded by $(1 + \sqrtε)^2$. An interpretation of the Kadison-Singer theorem is that we can always find a partition of the vectors $v_1,\cdots,v_n$ into two sets with a low discrepancy in terms of the spectral norm (in other words, rely on the determinant polynomial). In this paper, we provide two results for a broader class of polynomials, the hyperbolic polynomials. Furthermore, our results are in two generalized settings: $\bullet$ The first one shows that the Kadison-Singer result requires a weaker assumption that the vectors have a bounded sum of hyperbolic norms. $\bullet$ The second one relaxes the Kadison-Singer result's distribution assumption to the Strongly Rayleigh distribution. To the best of our knowledge, the previous results only support determinant polynomials [Anari and Oveis Gharan'14, Kyng, Luh and Song'20]. It is unclear whether they can be generalized to a broader class of polynomials. In addition, we also provide a sub-exponential time algorithm for constructing our results.

The simplex method for linear programming is known to be highly efficient in practice, and understanding its performance from a theoretical perspective is an active research topic. The framework of smoothed analysis, first introduced by Spielman and Teng (JACM ’04) for this purpose, defines the smoothed complexity of solving a linear program with d variables and n constraints as the expected running time when Gaussian noise of variance σ2 is added to the LP data. We prove that the smoothed complexity of the simplex method is O(σ−3/2 d13/4log7/4 n), improving the dependence on 1/σ compared to the previous bound of O(σ−2 d2√logn). We accomplish this through a new analysis of the shadow bound, key to earlier analyses as well. Illustrating the power of our new method, we use our method to prove a nearly tight upper bound on the smoothed complexity of two-dimensional polygons.

We give a randomized 1+5.06/√k-approximation algorithm for the minimum k-edge connected spanning multi-subgraph problem, k-ECSM.

This paper explores a theory of generalization for learning problems on product distributions, complementing the existing learning theories in the sense that it does not rely on any complexity measures of the hypothesis classes. The main contributions are two general sample complexity bounds: (1) $\tilde{O} \big( \frac{nk}{\epsilon^2} \big)$ samples are sufficient and necessary for learning an $\epsilon$-optimal hypothesis in \emph{any problem} on an $n$-dimensional product distribution, whose marginals have finite supports of sizes at most $k$; (2) $\tilde{O} \big( \frac{n}{\epsilon^2} \big)$ samples are sufficient and necessary for any problem on $n$-dimensional product distributions if it satisfies a notion of strong monotonicity from the algorithmic game theory literature. As applications of these theories, we match the optimal sample complexity for single-parameter revenue maximization (Guo et al., STOC 2019), improve the state-of-the-art for multi-parameter revenue maximization (Gonczarowski and Weinberg, FOCS 2018) and prophet inequality (Correa et al., EC 2019; Rubinstein et al., ITCS 2020), and provide the first and tight sample complexity bound for Pandora’s problem.

We show that the smoothed complexity of the FLIP algorithm for local Max-Cut is at most φ n O(√logn), where n is the number of nodes in the graph and φ is a parameter that measures the magnitude of perturbations applied on its edge weights. This improves the previously best upper bound of φ n O(logn) by Etscheid and Roglin. Our result is based on an analysis of long sequences of flips, which shows that it is very unlikely for every flip in a long sequence to incur a positive but small improvement in the cut weight. We also extend the same upper bound on the smoothed complexity of FLIP to all binary Maximum Constraint Satisfaction Problems.

This paper settles the sample complexity of single-parameter revenue maximization by showing matching upper and lower bounds, up to a poly-logarithmic factor, for all families of value distributions that have been considered in the literature. The upper bounds are unified under a novel framework, which builds on the strong revenue monotonicity by Devanur, Huang, and Psomas (STOC 2016), and an information theoretic argument. This is fundamentally different from the previous approaches that rely on either constructing an є-net of the mechanism space, explicitly or implicitly via statistical learning theory, or learning an approximately accurate version of the virtual values. To our knowledge, it is the first time information theoretical arguments are used to show sample complexity upper bounds, instead of lower bounds. Our lower bounds are also unified under a meta construction of hard instances.