Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adithya M. Devraj
dblp:159/1538
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 36% Language models and text generation · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 22% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020 Zap Q-Learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020 Zap Q-Learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
non-linear function approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
primal-dual methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic approximation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Zap Q-Learning · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adaptive data mixing · 0.9stochastic approximation · 0.4neural network function approximation · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4min-max reformulation · 0.4two time-scale update · 0.3newton-raphson · 0.3ODE analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMsabstractNicholas E. Corrado, Julian Katz-Samuels, Adithya M Devraj, Hyokun Yun, Chao Zhang, Yi Xu, Yi Pan, Bing Yin, Trishul Chilimbi. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Nicholas Corrado, Julian Katz-Samuels, Adithya M. Devraj, Hyokun Yun, Yi Xu 0011, Trishul Chilimbi |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Explicit Mean-Square Error Bounds for Monte-Carlo and Linear Stochastic ApproximationabstractThis paper concerns error bounds for recursive equations subject to Markovian disturbances. Motivating examples abound within the fields of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), and many of these algorithms can be interpreted as special cases of stochastic approximation (SA). It is argued that it is not possible in general to obtain a Hoeffding bound on the error sequence, even when the underlying Markov chain is reversible and geometrically ergodic, such as the M/M/1 queue. This is motivation for the focus on mean square error bounds for parameter estimates. It is shown that mean square error achieves the optimal rate of $O(1/n)$, subject to conditions on the step-size sequence. Moreover, the exact constants in the rate are obtained, which is of great value in algorithm design. Adithya M. Devraj, Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2020 | Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function ApproximationabstractZap Q-learning is a recent class of reinforcement learning algorithms, motivated primarily as a means to accelerate convergence. Stability theory has been absent outside of two restrictive classes: the tabular setting, and optimal stopping. This paper introduces a new framework for analysis of a more general class of recursive algorithms known as stochastic approximation. Based on this general theory, it is shown that Zap Q-learning is consistent under a non-degeneracy assumption, even when the function approximation architecture is nonlinear. Zap Q-learning with neural network function approximation emerges as a special case, and is tested on examples from OpenAI Gym. Based on multiple experiments with a range of neural network sizes, it is found that the new algorithms converge quickly and are robust to choice of function approximation architecture. Adithya M. Devraj, Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition OptimizationabstractWe consider a generic empirical composition optimization problem, where there are empirical averages present both outside and inside nonlinear loss functions. Such a problem is of interest in various machine learning applications, and cannot be directly solved by standard methods such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We take a novel approach to solving this problem by reformulating the original minimization objective into an equivalent min-max objective, which brings out all the empirical averages that are originally inside the nonlinear loss functions. We exploit the rich structures of the reformulated problem and develop a stochastic primal-dual algorithms, SVRPDA-I, to solve the problem efficiently. We carry out extensive theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithm, obtaining the convergence rate, the total computation complexity and the storage complexity. In particular, the algorithm is shown to converge at a linear rate when the problem is strongly convex. Moreover, we also develop an approximate version of the algorithm, named SVRPDA-II, which further reduces the memory requirement. Finally, we evaluate the performance of our algorithms on several real-world benchmarks and experimental results show that they significantly outperform existing techniques. Adithya M. Devraj, Jianshu Chen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Zap Q-LearningabstractThe Zap Q-learning algorithm introduced in this paper is an improvement of Watkins' original algorithm and recent competitors in several respects. It is a matrix-gain algorithm designed so that its asymptotic variance is optimal. Moreover, an ODE analysis suggests that the transient behavior is a close match to a deterministic Newton-Raphson implementation. This is made possible by a two time-scale update equation for the matrix gain sequence. The analysis suggests that the approach will lead to stable and efficient computation even for non-ideal parameterized settings. Numerical experiments confirm the quick convergence, even in such non-ideal cases. Adithya M. Devraj, Sean P. Meyn |
NIPS | 1 |