Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adithya M. Devraj

dblp:159/1538 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 36% Language models and text generation · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 22%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing
0.912025
AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation
0.912025
AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning
0.722020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Zap Q-Learning · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning
0.722020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Zap Q-Learning · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation
0.412020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
non-linear function approximation
0.412020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
primal-dual methods
0.412019
Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.412019
Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction
0.412019
Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic approximation
0.312017
Zap Q-Learning · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adaptive data mixing · 0.9stochastic approximation · 0.4neural network function approximation · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4min-max reformulation · 0.4two time-scale update · 0.3newton-raphson · 0.3ODE analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs
abstract
Nicholas E. Corrado, Julian Katz-Samuels, Adithya M Devraj, Hyokun Yun, Chao Zhang, Yi Xu, Yi Pan, Bing Yin, Trishul Chilimbi. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Nicholas Corrado, Julian Katz-Samuels, Adithya M. Devraj, Hyokun Yun, Yi Xu 0011, Trishul Chilimbi
ACL (1)3
2020 Explicit Mean-Square Error Bounds for Monte-Carlo and Linear Stochastic Approximation
abstract
This paper concerns error bounds for recursive equations subject to Markovian disturbances. Motivating examples abound within the fields of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), and many of these algorithms can be interpreted as special cases of stochastic approximation (SA). It is argued that it is not possible in general to obtain a Hoeffding bound on the error sequence, even when the underlying Markov chain is reversible and geometrically ergodic, such as the M/M/1 queue. This is motivation for the focus on mean square error bounds for parameter estimates. It is shown that mean square error achieves the optimal rate of $O(1/n)$, subject to conditions on the step-size sequence. Moreover, the exact constants in the rate are obtained, which is of great value in algorithm design.
Adithya M. Devraj, Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn
AISTATS2
2020 Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation
abstract
Zap Q-learning is a recent class of reinforcement learning algorithms, motivated primarily as a means to accelerate convergence. Stability theory has been absent outside of two restrictive classes: the tabular setting, and optimal stopping. This paper introduces a new framework for analysis of a more general class of recursive algorithms known as stochastic approximation. Based on this general theory, it is shown that Zap Q-learning is consistent under a non-degeneracy assumption, even when the function approximation architecture is nonlinear. Zap Q-learning with neural network function approximation emerges as a special case, and is tested on examples from OpenAI Gym. Based on multiple experiments with a range of neural network sizes, it is found that the new algorithms converge quickly and are robust to choice of function approximation architecture.
Adithya M. Devraj, Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn
NeurIPS2
2019 Stochastic Variance Reduced Primal Dual Algorithms for Empirical Composition Optimization
abstract
We consider a generic empirical composition optimization problem, where there are empirical averages present both outside and inside nonlinear loss functions. Such a problem is of interest in various machine learning applications, and cannot be directly solved by standard methods such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We take a novel approach to solving this problem by reformulating the original minimization objective into an equivalent min-max objective, which brings out all the empirical averages that are originally inside the nonlinear loss functions. We exploit the rich structures of the reformulated problem and develop a stochastic primal-dual algorithms, SVRPDA-I, to solve the problem efficiently. We carry out extensive theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithm, obtaining the convergence rate, the total computation complexity and the storage complexity. In particular, the algorithm is shown to converge at a linear rate when the problem is strongly convex. Moreover, we also develop an approximate version of the algorithm, named SVRPDA-II, which further reduces the memory requirement. Finally, we evaluate the performance of our algorithms on several real-world benchmarks and experimental results show that they significantly outperform existing techniques.
Adithya M. Devraj, Jianshu Chen
NeurIPS1
2017 Zap Q-Learning
abstract
The Zap Q-learning algorithm introduced in this paper is an improvement of Watkins' original algorithm and recent competitors in several respects. It is a matrix-gain algorithm designed so that its asymptotic variance is optimal. Moreover, an ODE analysis suggests that the transient behavior is a close match to a deterministic Newton-Raphson implementation. This is made possible by a two time-scale update equation for the matrix gain sequence. The analysis suggests that the approach will lead to stable and efficient computation even for non-ideal parameterized settings. Numerical experiments confirm the quick convergence, even in such non-ideal cases.
Adithya M. Devraj, Sean P. Meyn
NIPS1