Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Poulami Ghosh

dblp:159/3636 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis
0.812024
A Morphology-Based Investigation of Positional Encodings · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding
0.812024
A Morphology-Based Investigation of Positional Encodings · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.812024
A Morphology-Based Investigation of Positional Encodings · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.8probing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Morphology-Based Investigation of Positional Encodings
abstract
Contemporary deep learning models effectively handle languages with diverse morphology despite not being directly integrated into them.Morphology and word order are closely linked, with the latter incorporated into transformerbased models through positional encodings.This prompts a fundamental inquiry: Is there a correlation between the morphological complexity of a language and the utilization of positional encoding in pre-trained language models?In pursuit of an answer, we present the first study addressing this question, encompassing 22 languages and 5 downstream tasks.Our findings reveal that the importance of positional encoding diminishes with increasing morphological complexity in languages.Our study motivates the need for a deeper understanding of positional encoding, augmenting them to better reflect the different languages under consideration.
Poulami Ghosh, Shikhar Vashishth, Raj Dabre, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
EMNLP1