VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yiwen Qiu
dblp:159/9832
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 37% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Variable Causal Discovery under Selection Bias · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Variable Causal Discovery under Selection Bias · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
latent variable causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Variable Causal Discovery under Selection Bias · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Variable Causal Discovery under Selection Bias · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Identifying Selections for Unsupervised Subtask Discovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
latent confounder identification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › transfer imitation learning
multi-task imitation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Identifying Selections for Unsupervised Subtask Discovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-task reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Identifying Selections for Unsupervised Subtask Discovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
offline-to-online reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value function estimation
q-function learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rank constraint · 0.9graph-theoretic characterization · 0.9covariance analysis · 0.9sequential non-negative matrix factorization · 0.8nonparametric identifiability analysis · 0.8causal identification · 0.8sim-to-real transfer · 0.6q-learning · 0.6dynamics-aware policy evaluation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Latent Variable Causal Discovery under Selection BiasabstractAddressing selection bias in latent variable causal discovery is important yet underexplored, largely due to a lack of suitable statistical tools: While various tools beyond basic conditional independencies have been developed to handle latent variables, none have been adapted for selection bias. We make an attempt by studying rank constraints, which, as a generalization to conditional independence constraints, exploits the ranks of covariance submatrices in linear Gaussian models. We show that although selection can significantly complicate the joint distribution, interestingly, the ranks in the biased covariance matrices still preserve meaningful information about both causal structures and selection mechanisms. We provide a graph-theoretic characterization of such rank constraints. Using this tool, we demonstrate that the one-factor model, a classical latent variable model, can be identified under selection bias. Simulations and real-world experiments confirm the effectiveness of using our rank constraints. Haoyue Dai, Yiwen Qiu, Ignavier Ng, Xinshuai Dong, Peter Spirtes, Kun Zhang 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential DataabstractWe argue that the selective inclusion of data points based on latent objectives is common in practical situations, such as music sequences. Since this selection process often distorts statistical analysis, previous work primarily views it as a bias to be corrected and proposes various methods to mitigate its effect. However, while controlling this bias is crucial, selection also offers an opportunity to provide a deeper insight into the hidden generation process, as it is a fundamental mechanism underlying what we observe. In particular, overlooking selection in sequential data can lead to an incomplete or overcomplicated inductive bias in modeling, such as assuming a universal autoregressive structure for all dependencies. Therefore, rather than merely viewing it as a bias, we explore the causal structure of selection in sequential data to delve deeper into the complete causal process. Specifically, we show that selection structure is identifiable without any parametric assumptions or interventional experiments. Moreover, even in cases where selection variables coexist with latent confounders, we still establish the nonparametric identifiability under appropriate structural conditions. Meanwhile, we also propose a provably correct algorithm to detect and identify selection structures as well as other types of dependencies. The framework has been validated empirically on both synthetic data and real-world music. Yujia Zheng 0001, Zeyu Tang 0002, Yiwen Qiu, Bernhard Schölkopf, Kun Zhang 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Identifying Selections for Unsupervised Subtask DiscoveryabstractWhen solving long-horizon tasks, it is intriguing to decompose the high-level task into subtasks. Decomposing experiences into reusable subtasks can improve data efficiency, accelerate policy generalization, and in general provide promising solutions to multi-task reinforcement learning and imitation learning problems. However, the concept of subtasks is not sufficiently understood and modeled yet, and existing works often overlook the true structure of the data generation process: subtasks are the results of a *selection* mechanism on actions, rather than possible underlying confounders or intermediates. Specifically, we provide a theory to identify, and experiments to verify the existence of selection variables in such data. These selections serve as subgoals that indicate subtasks and guide policy. In light of this idea, we develop a sequential non-negative matrix factorization (seq- NMF) method to learn these subgoals and extract meaningful behavior patterns as subtasks. Our empirical results on a challenging Kitchen environment demonstrate that the learned subtasks effectively enhance the generalization to new tasks in multi-task imitation learning scenarios. The codes are provided at this [*link*](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Identifying\_Selections\_for\_Unsupervised\_Subtask\_Discovery/README.md). Yiwen Qiu, Yujia Zheng 0001, Kun Zhang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | When to Trust Your Simulator: Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement LearningabstractLearning effective reinforcement learning (RL) policies to solve real-world complex tasks can be quite challenging without a high-fidelity simulation environment. In most cases, we are only given imperfect simulators with simplified dynamics, which inevitably lead to severe sim-to-real gaps in RL policy learning. The recently emerged field of offline RL provides another possibility to learn policies directly from pre-collected historical data. However, to achieve reasonable performance, existing offline RL algorithms need impractically large offline data with sufficient state-action space coverage for training. This brings up a new question: is it possible to combine learning from limited real data in offline RL and unrestricted exploration through imperfect simulators in online RL to address the drawbacks of both approaches? In this study, we propose the Dynamics-Aware Hybrid Offline-and-Online Reinforcement Learning (H2O) framework to provide an affirmative answer to this question. H2O introduces a dynamics-aware policy evaluation scheme, which adaptively penalizes the Q function learning on simulated state-action pairs with large dynamics gaps, while also simultaneously allowing learning from a fixed real-world dataset. Through extensive simulation and real-world tasks, as well as theoretical analysis, we demonstrate the superior performance of H2O against other cross-domain online and offline RL algorithms. H2O provides a brand new hybrid offline-and-online RL paradigm, which can potentially shed light on future RL algorithm design for solving practical real-world tasks. Yiwen Qiu, Guyue Zhou, Jianming Hu, Xianyuan Zhan |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2011 | Single Image Super Resolution Method Based on Edge PreservationabstractIn this paper, we present a novel super resolution (SR) framework based on edge preservation. The iterative back-projection algorithm (IBP) is a classical SR method and has low computational complexity, which can be applied in real time applications. However, it often produces many artifacts especially along the strong edges. To reduce the jaggy artifacts, our approach has three steps. First, we improve the initial estimate using bilateral filtering to strengthen the true edges. Second, we learn the structural content of low resolution pixel and the correlation among the pixels with similar structure. Third, we use the correlation to guide the output image reconstructed by the IBP algorithm. The experimental result proved that our proposed method can remove the artifacts and obtain clear and sharp edges in visual perception. Yaqiong Fan, Zongliang Gan, Yiwen Qiu, Xiuchang Zhu |
ICIG | 3 |