Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiang Huang 0007
dblp:16/1064-7
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1904-0494ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 63% Language models and text generation · 14% Information extraction and text analysis · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
2.2 | 3 | 2025 | TARGA: Targeted Synthetic Data Generation for Practical Reasoning over Structured Data · ACL (1) 2025 MarkQA: A large scale KBQA dataset with numerical reasoning · EMNLP 2023 Question Decomposition Tree for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge Bases · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TARGA: Targeted Synthetic Data Generation for Practical Reasoning over Structured Data · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge base question answering
complex question answering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Question Decomposition Tree for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge Bases · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-hop reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MarkQA: A large scale KBQA dataset with numerical reasoning · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MarkQA: A large scale KBQA dataset with numerical reasoning · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question decomposition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Question Decomposition Tree for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge Bases · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | TARGA: Targeted Synthetic Data Generation for Practical Reasoning over Structured Data · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
layer-wise expansion · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9cross-layer combination · 0.9question decomposition tree · 0.7natural language generation · 0.7logic form · 0.7QDMR · 0.7PyQL · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TARGA: Targeted Synthetic Data Generation for Practical Reasoning over Structured DataabstractSemantic parsing, which converts natural language questions into logic forms, plays a crucial role in reasoning within structured environments.However, existing methods encounter two significant challenges: reliance on extensive manually annotated datasets and limited generalization capability to unseen examples.To tackle these issues, we propose Targeted Synthetic Data Generation (TARGA), a practical framework that dynamically generates high-relevance synthetic data without manual annotation.Starting from the pertinent entities and relations of a given question, we probe for the potential relevant queries through layer-wise expansion and cross-layer combination.Then we generate corresponding natural language questions for these constructed queries to jointly serve as the synthetic demonstrations for in-context learning.Experiments on multiple knowledge base question answering (KBQA) datasets demonstrate that TARGA, using only a 7B-parameter model, substantially outperforms existing non-finetuned methods that utilize close-sourced model, achieving notable improvements in F1 scores on GrailQA (+7.7) and KBQA-Agent (+12.2).Furthermore, TARGA also exhibits superior sample efficiency, robustness, and generalization capabilities under non-I.I.D. settings. Xiang Huang 0007, Jiayu Shen, Sitao Cheng, Xiaxia Wang 0001, Yuzhong Qu |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Question Decomposition Tree for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge BasesabstractKnowledge base question answering (KBQA) has attracted a lot of interest in recent years, especially for complex questions which require multiple facts to answer. Question decomposition is a promising way to answer complex questions. Existing decomposition methods split the question into sub-questions according to a single compositionality type, which is not sufficient for questions involving multiple compositionality types. In this paper, we propose Question Decomposition Tree (QDT) to represent the structure of complex questions. Inspired by recent advances in natural language generation (NLG), we present a two-staged method called Clue-Decipher to generate QDT. It can leverage the strong ability of NLG model and simultaneously preserve the original questions. To verify that QDT can enhance KBQA task, we design a decomposition-based KBQA system called QDTQA. Extensive experiments show that QDTQA outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on ComplexWebQuestions dataset. Besides, our decomposition method improves an existing KBQA system by 12% and sets a new state-of-the-art on LC-QuAD 1.0. Xiang Huang 0007, Sitao Cheng, Yiheng Shu, Yuheng Bao, Yuzhong Qu |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | MarkQA: A large scale KBQA dataset with numerical reasoningabstractWhile question answering over knowledge bases (KBQA) has shown progress in addressing factoid questions, KBQA with numerical reasoning remains relatively unexplored.In this paper, we focus on the complex numerical reasoning in KBQA and propose a new task, NR-KBQA, which necessitates the ability to perform both multi-hop reasoning and numerical reasoning.We design a logic form in Python format called PyQL to represent the reasoning process of numerical reasoning questions.To facilitate the development of NR-KBQA, we present a large dataset called MarkQA, which is automatically constructed from a small set of seeds.Each question in MarkQA is equipped with its corresponding SPARQL query, alongside the step-by-step reasoning process in the QDMR format and PyQL program.Experimental results of some stateof-the-art QA methods on the MarkQA show that complex numerical reasoning in KBQA faces great challenges.2021 2021 value value point in time point in time total assets total assets Netflix Netflix Chappaqua Chappaqua Xiang Huang 0007, Sitao Cheng, Yuheng Bao, Yuzhong Qu |
EMNLP | 1 |