Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cristina Gacek

dblp:16/1528 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6Systems, architecture and hardware · 5Security and privacy · 5

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 84% Software maintenance and evolution · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.122002
ICSE 2002 workshop on architecting dependable systems · ICSE 2002
Automatically Detecting Mismatches During Component-based and Model-based Development · ASE 1999
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.011999
Automatically Detecting Mismatches During Component-based and Model-based Development · ASE 1999
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › component-based software engineering
component integration
0.011999
Automatically Detecting Mismatches During Component-based and Model-based Development · ASE 1999
Software maintenance and evolution
software integration
0.011999
Automatically Detecting Mismatches During Component-based and Model-based Development · ASE 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based integration · 0.0component-based integration · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Workshop on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS 2009)
abstract
This workshop summary gives a brief overview of the workshop on “Architecting Dependable Systems” held in conjunction with DSN 2009. The main aim of this workshop is to promote cross-fertilization between the software architecture and dependability communities. We believe that both of them will benefit from clarifying approaches that have been previously tested and have succeeded as well as those that have been tried but have not yet been shown to be successful.
António Casimiro, Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek
DSN3
2008 Workshop on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS 2008)
abstract
This workshop summary gives a brief overview of the workshop on ldquoArchitecting Dependable Systemsrdquo held in conjunction with DSN 2008. The main aim of this workshop is to promote cross-fertilization between the software architecture and dependability communities. We believe that both of them will benefit from clarifying approaches that have been previously tested and have succeeded as well as those that have been tried but have not yet been shown to be successful.
Rogério de Lemos, Jean-Charles Fabre, Cristina Gacek
DSN3
2007 Workshop on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS 2007)
abstract
This workshop summary gives a brief overview of the workshop on "Architecting Dependable Systems" held in conjunction with DSN 2007. The main aim of this workshop is to promote cross-fertilization between the software architecture and dependability communities. We believe that both of them will benefit from clarifying approaches that have been previously tested and have succeeded as well as those that have been tried but have not yet been shown to be successful.
Rogério de Lemos, Felicita Di Giandomenico, Cristina Gacek
DSN3
2006 Workshop on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS)
abstract
This workshop will continue the initiative, which started four years ago, of bringing together the international communities of dependability and software architectures. The first workshop on Architecting Dependable Systems was organised during the International Conference on Software Engineering 2002 (ICSE), and since then five workshops were organised and three books were published (http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/wads). This activity has culminated in 2004 with the organisation of the Twin Workshops that were held at ICSE 2004 and DSN 2004. This series of workshops have shown to be a fertile ground for both communities for clarifying approaches that have been previously tried and succeeded, as well as those that have been tried but have not yet shown to be successful. This not only helps avoid the reinvention of the wheel, but also clarifies and promotes areas where the most promising research may lie.
Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek, Alexander B. Romanovsky
DSN2
2006 Architecting dependable systems
Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek, Alexander B. Romanovsky
J. Syst. Softw.2
2004 Twin Workshops on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS 2004)
Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek, Alexander B. Romanovsky
DSN2
2004 Twin Workshops on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS 2004)
Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek, Alexander B. Romanovsky
ICSE2
2003 ICSE 2003 Workshop on Software Architectures for Dependable Systems
abstract
This workshop summary gives a brief overview of a one-day workshop on "Software Architectures for Dependable Systems" held in conjunctions with ICSE 2003.
Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek, Alexander B. Romanovsky
ICSE2
2002 ICSE 2002 workshop on architecting dependable systems
abstract
This workshop summary gives a brief overview of a one day workshop on "Architecting Dependable Systems" held in conjunctions with ICSE 2002.
Rogério de Lemos, Cristina Gacek, Alexander B. Romanovsky
ICSE2
2000 Implementation Issues in Product Line Scoping
Klaus Schmid, Cristina Gacek
ICSR2
1999 Automatically Detecting Mismatches During Component-based and Model-based Development
abstract
A major emphasis in software development is placed on identifying and reconciling architectural and design mismatches. These mismatches happen during software development on two levels: while composing system components (e.g. COTS or in-house developed) and while reconciling view perspectives. Composing components into a system and 'composing' views (e.g. diagrams) into a system model are often seen as being somewhat distinct aspects of software development. However, as this paper shows, their approaches in detecting mismatches complement each other very well. In both cases, the composition process may result in mismatches that are caused by clashes between development artefacts. Our component-based integration approach is more high-level and can be used early on for risk assessment while little information is available. Model-based integration, on the other hand needs more information to start with but is more precise and can handle large amounts of redundant information. This paper describes both integration approaches and discusses their commonalities and differences. Both integration approaches are automatable, and some tool support is already available.
Alexander Egyed, Cristina Gacek
ASE2